MJA
MJA

Improving organ donation rates and transplantation in Australia

Richard DM Allen and Henry CC Pleass
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00590
Published online: 2 October 2017

Broader acceptance of organs from circulatory death donors would increase donor rates significantly

The initiative funded by the Federal Government in 2009 to improve both the identification of potential deceased organ donors and family consent rates has dramatically changed the prospects for Australians with end-stage organ failure. The subsequent establishment of a coordinated DonateLife network, with more than 150 medical and nursing staff charged with identifying potential organ donors, has led to the donation rate increasing over the past 5 years from 11.4 to 20.9 donors per million population (pmp) in 2016. Record numbers of organ transplants and reduced waiting times for transplantation have resulted.1,2

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Unravelling the evidence for prescribing medicinal cannabis

David Allsop
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00063
Published online: 2 October 2017

Handbook of cannabis. Roger G Pertwee, editor. Oxford University Press, 2016 (£40.00; 784 pp). ISBN 9780198792604


  • Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: david.allsop@sydney.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Health care variation: the next challenge for clinical colleges

Helen Francombe, Heather A Buchan and Anne Duggan
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00676
Published online: 2 October 2017

Unwarranted variation in health care requires action from all players in health — including clinical colleges

Marked variations in the use of 18 health care services, such as hospitalisations for chronic diseases and surgical procedures, were reported in the Second Australian atlas of healthcare variation (the second Atlas), recently published by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission).1 The amount of variation seen is unlikely to be explained by differences in patient needs, and so indicates opportunities for delivering more effective patient care and getting better outcomes for individuals and for the community.2


  • 1 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW



Competing interests:

We all work for the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, which published the second Atlas.

  • 1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Second Australian atlas of healthcare variation. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2017.
  • 2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, National Health Performance Authority. First Australian atlas of healthcare variation. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2015.
  • 3. Australian Orthopaedic Association. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2015. Adelaide: AOA, 2015.
  • 4. Muthuri SG, Hui M, Doherty M, Zhang W. What if we prevent obesity? Risk reduction in knee osteoarthritis estimated through a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 982-990.
  • 5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Focus on health: geographic variations in health care. Paris: OECD, 2014.
  • 6. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Osteoarthritis of the knee: clinical care standard. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2017.
  • 7. Arthritis Australia. Time to move: osteoarthritis. Arthritis Australia, 2014.
  • 8. Christensen R, Bartels EM, Astrup A, Bliddal H. Effect of weight reduction in obese patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 433-439.
  • 9. Brand C, Hunter D, Hinman R, et al. Improving care for people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: how has national policy for osteoarthritis been translated into service models in Australia? Int J Rheum Dis 2011; 14: 181-190.
  • 10. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Chapter 7: Prevention of chronic disease. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 9th ed. Melbourne: RACGP, 2016.
  • 11. Council of Presidents of Medical Colleges. National Health Summit on Obesity: report and consensus statement. Canberra: CPMC, 2016.
  • 12. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Weighing the cost of obesity: a case for action. PwC, 2015.
  • 13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4714.0 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social survey, 2014-2015. Canberra: ABS, 2016.
  • 14. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.001 National health survey: first results, 2014-2015. Canberra: ABS, 2015.
  • 15. Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia: MBA, 2014.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Untapped potential in Australian hospitals for organ donation after circulatory death

Sandeep S Rakhra, Helen I Opdam, Laura Gladkis, Byron Arcia, Michael A Fink, John Kanellis, Peter S Macdonald, Gregory I Snell and David V Pilcher
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01405
Published online: 25 September 2017

Abstract

Objective: To determine the potential for organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) in Australia by applying ideal and expanded organ suitability criteria, and to compare this potential with actual DCD rates.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting, methods: We analysed DonateLife audit data for patients aged 28 days to 80 years who died between July 2012 and December 2014 in an intensive care unit or emergency department, or who died within 24 hours of discharge from either, in the 75 Australian hospitals contributing data to DonateLife. Ideal and expanded organ donation criteria were derived from international and national guidelines, and from expert opinion. Potential DCD organ donors were identified by applying these criteria to patients who had been intubated and were neither confirmed as being brain-dead nor likely to have met brain death criteria at the official time of death.

Results: 8780 eligible patients were identified, of whom 202 were actual DCD donors. For 193 potential ideal (61%) and 313 potential expanded criteria DCD donors (72%), organ donation had not been discussed with their families; most were potential donors of kidneys (416 potential donors) or lungs (117 potential donors). Potential donors were typically older, dying of non-neurological causes, and more frequently had chronic organ disease than actual donors. Identifying all these potential donors, assuming a consent rate of 60%, would have increased Australia’s donation rate from 16.1 to 21.3 per million population in 2014.

Conclusions: The untapped potential for DCD in Australia, particularly of kidneys and lungs, is significant. Systematic review of all patients undergoing end-of-life care in critical care environments for donor suitability could result in significant increases in organ donation rates.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Australian Organ and Tissue Authority, Canberra, ACT
  • 4 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 6 Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 7 St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 8 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: sandeeprakhra@gmail.com

Acknowledgements: 

We acknowledge and thank all data collectors and audit officers who contribute to the DonateLife Audit. The DonateLife organisation is funded by the Australian Government. This particular research project was not funded.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry. ANZOD Registry annual report 2015. Adelaide: ANZOD Registry, 2015. http://www.anzdata.org.au/anzod/ANZODReport/2015/2015ANZOD_annrpt.pdf (accessed Nov 2015).
  • 2. Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority. Annual report 2014–15. Canberra: AOTDTA, 2015. http://www.donatelife.gov.au/sites/default/files/OTA_AR2015.pdf (accessed Dec 2015).
  • 3. International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation. Final numbers 2014. IRODT, 2015. http://www.irodat.org/img/database/pdf/NEWSLETTER2015_December2.pdf (accessed Feb 2017).
  • 4. Manara AR, Murphy PG, O’Callaghan G. Donation after circulatory death. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108 (Suppl 1): i108-i121.
  • 5. Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP. Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2893-2894.
  • 6. Snell GI, Esmore DS, Westall GP, et al. The Alfred Hospital lung transplant experience. Clin Transpl 2007: 131-144.
  • 7. Doyle MBM, Collins K, Vachharajani N, et al. Outcomes using grafts from donors after cardiac death. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 142-152.
  • 8. Suárez F, Otero A, Solla M, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from Maastricht category-2 non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation 2008; 85: 9-14.
  • 9. Callaghan CJ, Charman SC, Muiesan P, et al. Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003287.
  • 10. Agopian VG, Petrowsky H, Kaldas FM, et al. The evolution of liver transplantation during 3 decades: analysis of 5347 consecutive liver transplants at a single center. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 409-421.
  • 11. Macdonald P, Verran D, O’Leary M, et al. Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors. Transplantation 2015; 99: 1101-1102.
  • 12. Dhital KK, Iyer A, Connellan M, et al. Adult heart transplantation with distant procurement and ex-vivo preservation of donor hearts after circulatory death: a case series. Lancet 2015; 385: 2585-2591.
  • 13. Pilcher D, Gladkis L, Arcia B, et al. Estimating the number of organ donors in Australian hospitals — implications for monitoring organ donation practices. Transplantation 2015; 99: 2203-2209.
  • 14. Opdam HI, Silvester W. Potential for organ donation in Victoria: an audit of hospital deaths. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 250-254. <MJA full text>
  • 15. Opdam HS, Silvester W. Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1390-1397.
  • 16. Kirchner C, Raduenz S, Fruehauf NR, et al. Estimated organ donor potential in German maximum care hospitals. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 1310-1312.
  • 17. Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 667-674.
  • 18. Coulson TG, Pilcher DV, Graham SM, et al. Single-centre experience of donation after cardiac death. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 166-169. <MJA full text>
  • 19. Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand. Clinical guidelines for organ transplantation from deceased donors; version 1.0. Apr 2015. http://www.donatelife.gov.au/sites/default/files/TSANZ%20Clinical%20Guidelines%20for%20Organ%20Transplantation%20from%20Deceased%20Donors_Version%201.0_April%202016.pdf (accessed Dec 2015).
  • 20. British Transplantation Society. Transplantation from deceased donors circulatory death. 2013. https://bts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15_BTS_Donors_DCD-1.pdf (accessed Oct 2015).
  • 21. Scalea JR, Redfield RR, Rizzari MD, et al. When do DCD donors die? Outcomes and implications of DCD at a high-volume, single-center OPO in the United States. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 211-216.
  • 22. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Deceased organ donor potential in Canada: report. Dec 2014. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/organdonorpotential_2014_en_0.pdf (accessed Feb 2016).
  • 23. NHS Blood and Transplant. Organ donation and transplantation activity report 2014/15. http://nhsbtmediaservices.blob.core.windows.net/organ-donation-assets/pdfs/activity_report_2014_15.pdf (accessed Feb 2016).
  • 24. Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. 2015 Annual report. Melbourne: ANZICS, 2015. http://www.anzics.com.au/Downloads/ANZICS Annual Report 2015.pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

REM sleep behaviour disorder: not just a bad dream

Elie Matar and Simon JG Lewis
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00321
Published online: 18 September 2017

Summary

 

  • Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterised by the loss of the normal atonia during the REM stage of sleep, resulting in overt motor behaviours that usually represent the enactment of dreams. Patients will seek medical attention due to sleep-related injuries or unpleasant dream content.
  • Idiopathic RBD which occurs independently of any other disease occurs in up to 2% of the older population. Meanwhile, secondary RBD is very common in association with certain neurodegenerative conditions. RBD can also occur in the context of antidepressant use, obstructive sleep apnoea and narcolepsy.
  • RBD can be diagnosed with a simple screening question followed by confirmation with polysomnography to exclude potential mimics.
  • Treatment for RBD is effective and involves treatment of underlying causes, modification of the sleep environment, and pharmacotherapy with either clonazepam or melatonin.
  • An important finding in the past decade is the recognition that almost all patients with idiopathic RBD will ultimately go on to develop Parkinson disease or dementia with Lewy bodies. This suggests that idiopathic RBD represents a prodromal phase of these conditions.
  • Physicians should be aware of the risk of phenoconversion. They should educate idiopathic RBD patients to recognise the symptoms of these conditions and refer as appropriate for further testing and enrolment into research trials focused on neuroprotective measures.

 


  • 1 Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: simon.lewis@sydney.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

This work was conducted by the ForeFront project team and SJGL is supported by an NHMRC–ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship (1110414). ForeFront is a large collaborative research group dedicated to the study of neurodegenerative diseases and is funded by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1037746), Dementia Research Team (1095127), NeuroSleep Centre of Research Excellence (1060992), Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Program (CE110001021) and the Sydney Research Excellence Initiative 2020. We thank Dr Negar Memarian for providing the polysomnography recording data shown in Box 2.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Aserinsky E, Kleitman N. Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep. Science 1953; 118: 273-274.
  • 2. Iranzo A, Santamaria J, Tolosa E. Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: diagnosis, management, and the need for neuroprotective interventions. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 405-419.
  • 3. Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Montplaisir J. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder as a biomarker for neurodegeneration: the past 10 years. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 763-767.
  • 4. Fernandez-Arcos A, Iranzo A, Serradell M, et al. The clinical phenotype of idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder at presentation: a study in 203 consecutive patients. Sleep 2016; 39: 121-132.
  • 5. Boeve BF, Molano JR, Ferman TJ, et al. Validation of the Mayo Sleep Questionnaire to screen for REM sleep behavior disorder in a community-based sample. J Clin Sleep Med 2013; 9: 475-480.
  • 6. Postuma RB, Arnulf I, Hogl B, et al. A single-question screen for rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter validation study. Mov Disord 2012; 27: 913-916.
  • 7. Stiasny-Kolster K, Mayer G, Schafer S, et al. The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire–a new diagnostic instrument. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 2386-2393.
  • 8. Li SX, Wing YK, Lam SP, et al. Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK). Sleep Med 2010; 11: 43-48.
  • 9. Boeve BF, Molano JR, Ferman TJ, et al. Validation of the Mayo Sleep Questionnaire to screen for REM sleep behavior disorder in an aging and dementia cohort. Sleep Med 2011; 12: 445-453.
  • 10. Montplaisir J, Gagnon JF, Fantini ML, et al. Polysomnographic diagnosis of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 2044-2051.
  • 11. Frauscher B, Iranzo A, Gaig C, et al. Normative EMG values during REM sleep for the diagnosis of REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep 2012; 35: 835-847.
  • 12. Stefani A, Gabelia D, Mitterling T, et al. A prospective video-polysomnographic analysis of movements during physiological sleep in 100 healthy sleepers. Sleep 2015; 38: 1479-1487.
  • 13. Nielsen T, Svob C, Kuiken D. Dream-enacting behaviors in a normal population. Sleep 2009; 32: 1629-1636.
  • 14. Nielsen T, Paquette T. Dream-associated behaviors affecting pregnant and postpartum women. Sleep 2007; 30: 1162-1169.
  • 15. Iranzo A, Santamaria J. Severe obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea mimicking REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep 2005; 28: 203-206.
  • 16. Derry C. Nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy vs parasomnias. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2012; 14: 451-463.
  • 17. Avidan AY. Parasomnias and movement disorders of sleep. Semin Neurol 2009; 29: 372-392.
  • 18. Kang SH, Yoon IY, Lee SD, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder in the Korean elderly population: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Sleep 2013; 36: 1147-1152.
  • 19. Chiu HF, Wing YK, Lam LC, et al. Sleep-related injury in the elderly–an epidemiological study in Hong Kong. Sleep 2000; 23: 513-517.
  • 20. Ohayon MM, Caulet M, Priest RG. Violent behavior during sleep. J Clin Psychiatry 1997; 58: 369-376; quiz 377.
  • 21. Boeve BF. REM sleep behavior disorder: updated review of the core features, the REM sleep behavior disorder-neurodegenerative disease association, evolving concepts, controversies, and future directions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1184: 15-54.
  • 22. Schenck CH, Hurwitz TD, Mahowald MW. Symposium: Normal and abnormal REM sleep regulation: REM sleep behaviour disorder: an update on a series of 96 patients and a review of the world literature. J Sleep Res 1993; 2: 224-231.
  • 23. Zhou J, Zhang J, Li Y, et al. Gender differences in REM sleep behavior disorder: a clinical and polysomnographic study in China. Sleep Med 2015; 16: 414-418.
  • 24. Olson EJ, Boeve BF, Silber MH. Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: demographic, clinical and laboratory findings in 93 cases. Brain 2000; 123(Pt 2): 331-339.
  • 25. Bodkin CL, Schenck CH. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in women: relevance to general and specialty medical practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18: 1955-1963.
  • 26. Wing YK, Lam SP, Li SX, et al. REM sleep behaviour disorder in Hong Kong Chinese: clinical outcome and gender comparison. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 1415-1416.
  • 27. Zhou J, Zhang J, Du L, et al. Characteristics of early- and late-onset rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in China: a case-control study. Sleep Med 2014; 15: 654-660.
  • 28. Kotagal S. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder during childhood. Sleep Med Clin 2015; 10: 163-167.
  • 29. Scaglione C, Vignatelli L, Plazzi G, et al. REM sleep behaviour disorder in Parkinson’s disease: a questionnaire-based study. Neurol Sci 2005; 25: 316-321.
  • 30. Gagnon JF, Bedard MA, Fantini ML, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder and REM sleep without atonia in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2002; 59: 585-589.
  • 31. Boeve BF, Silber MH, Ferman TJ, et al. Clinicopathologic correlations in 172 cases of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 754-762.
  • 32. Boeve BF, Silber MH, Ferman TJ, et al. Association of REM sleep behavior disorder and neurodegenerative disease may reflect an underlying synucleinopathy. Mov Disord 2001; 16: 622-630.
  • 33. Ferman TJ, Boeve BF, Smith GE, et al. Inclusion of RBD improves the diagnostic classification of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 2011; 77: 875-882.
  • 34. Vetrugno R, Provini F, Cortelli P, et al. Sleep disorders in multiple system atrophy: a correlative video-polysomnographic study. Sleep Med 2004; 5: 21-30.
  • 35. Arnulf I, Merino-Andreu M, Bloch F, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder and REM sleep without atonia in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Sleep 2005; 28: 349-354.
  • 36. Abbott SM, Videnovic A. Sleep disorders in atypical Parkinsonism. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2014; 1: 89-96.
  • 37. D’Abreu A, Franca M, Jr, Conz L, et al. Sleep symptoms and their clinical correlates in Machado-Joseph disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 119: 277-280.
  • 38. Manni R, Terzaghi M. REM behavior disorder associated with epileptic seizures. Neurology 2005; 64: 883-884.
  • 39. Caminero A, Bartolome M. Sleep disturbances in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2011; 309: 86-91.
  • 40. Manni R, Ratti PL, Terzaghi M. Secondary ‘‘incidental’’ REM sleep behavior disorder: do we ever think of it? Sleep Med 2011; 12 Suppl 2: S50-S53.
  • 41. Ebben MR, Shahbazi M, Lange DJ, Krieger AC. REM behavior disorder associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2012; 13: 473-474.
  • 42. Arnulf I, Nielsen J, Lohmann E, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep disturbances in Huntington disease. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 482-488.
  • 43. Schenck CH, Mahowald MW, Anderson ML, et al. Lewy body variant of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) identified by postmortem ubiquitin staining in a previously reported case of AD associated with REM sleep behavior disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 42: 527-528.
  • 44. Thirumalai SS, Shubin RA, Robinson R. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in children with autism. J Child Neurol 2002; 17: 173-178.
  • 45. Trajanovic NN, Voloh I, Shapiro CM, Sandor P. REM sleep behaviour disorder in a child with Tourette’s syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 2004; 31: 572-575.
  • 46. Compta Y, Iranzo A, Santamaria J, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder and narcoleptic features in anti-Ma2-associated encephalitis. Sleep 2007; 30: 767-769.
  • 47. Iranzo A, Graus F, Clover L, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and potassium channel antibody-associated limbic encephalitis. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 178-181.
  • 48. Vale TC, Fernandes do Prado LB, do Prado GF, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration: improvement with immunotherapy. Sleep 2016; 39: 117-120.
  • 49. Tang WK, Hermann DM, Chen YK, et al. Brainstem infarcts predict REM sleep behavior disorder in acute ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol 2014; 14: 88.
  • 50. McCarter SJ, Tippmann-Peikert M, Sandness DJ, et al. Neuroimaging-evident lesional pathology associated with REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med 2015; 16: 1502-1510.
  • 51. Dauvilliers Y, Jennum P, Plazzi G. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and rapid eye movement sleep without atonia in narcolepsy. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 775-781.
  • 52. Winkelman JW, James L. Serotonergic antidepressants are associated with REM sleep without atonia. Sleep 2004; 27: 317-321.
  • 53. Gagnon JF, Postuma RB, Mazza S, et al. Rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder and neurodegenerative diseases. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 424-432.
  • 54. Morrison I, Frangulyan R, Riha RL. Beta-blockers as a cause of violent rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a poorly recognized but common cause of violent parasomnias. Am J Med 2011; 124: e11.
  • 55. Schenck CH, Mahowald MW. Motor dyscontrol in narcolepsy: rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep without atonia and REM sleep behavior disorder. Ann Neurol 1992; 32: 3-10.
  • 56. Postuma RB, Berg D. Advances in markers of prodromal Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12: 622-634.
  • 57. Schenck CH, Bundlie SR, Mahowald MW. Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder in 38% of 29 older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. Neurology 1996; 46: 388-393.
  • 58. Schenck CH, Boeve BF, Mahowald MW. Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder or dementia in 81% of older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a 16-year update on a previously reported series. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 744-748.
  • 59. Iranzo A, Fernandez-Arcos A, Tolosa E, et al. Neurodegenerative disorder risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: study in 174 patients. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89741.
  • 60. Postuma RB, Iranzo A, Hogl B, et al. Risk factors for neurodegeneration in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter study. Ann Neurol 2015; 77: 830-839.
  • 61. Iranzo A, Lomena F, Stockner H, et al. Decreased striatal dopamine transporter uptake and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity as risk markers of synucleinopathy in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a prospective study [corrected]. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1070-1077.
  • 62. Iranzo A, Valldeoriola F, Lomena F, et al. Serial dopamine transporter imaging of nigrostriatal function in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 797-805.
  • 63. Hanyu H, Inoue Y, Sakurai H, et al. Voxel-based magnetic resonance imaging study of structural brain changes in patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012; 18: 136-139.
  • 64. Unger MM, Belke M, Menzler K, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder reveals microstructural changes in the brainstem, substantia nigra, olfactory region, and other brain regions. Sleep 2010; 33: 767-773.
  • 65. Rodrigues Brazete J, Montplaisir J, Petit D, et al. Electroencephalogram slowing in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder is associated with mild cognitive impairment. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 1059-1063.
  • 66. Holtbernd F, Gagnon JF, Postuma RB, et al. Abnormal metabolic network activity in REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology 2014; 82: 620-627.
  • 67. Manni R, Sinforiani E, Pacchetti C, et al. Cognitive dysfunction and REM sleep behavior disorder: key findings in the literature and preliminary longitudinal findings. Int J Psychophysiol 2013; 89: 213-217.
  • 68. Gagnon JF, Vendette M, Postuma RB, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 39-47.
  • 69. Wan Y, Luo Y, Gan J, et al. Clinical markers of neurodegeneration in Chinese patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 150: 105-109.
  • 70. Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Vendette M, Montplaisir JY. Markers of neurodegeneration in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2009; 132(Pt 12): 3298-3307.
  • 71. Li Y, Kang W, Yang Q, et al. Predictive markers for early conversion of iRBD to neurodegenerative synucleinopathy diseases. Neurology 2017; 88: 1493-1500.
  • 72. Sprenger FS, Stefanova N, Gelpi E, et al. Enteric nervous system alpha-synuclein immunoreactivity in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology 2015; 85: 1761-1768.
  • 73. Vilas D, Iranzo A, Tolosa E, et al. Assessment of alpha-synuclein in submandibular glands of patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 708-718.
  • 74. Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Olson EJ, et al. Insights into REM sleep behavior disorder pathophysiology in brainstem-predominant Lewy body disease. Sleep Med 2007; 8: 60-64.
  • 75. Peever J, Luppi PH, Montplaisir J. Breakdown in REM sleep circuitry underlies REM sleep behavior disorder. Trends Neurosci 2014; 37: 279-288.
  • 76. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rub U, et al. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2003; 24: 197-211.
  • 77. Iranzo A, Tolosa E, Gelpi E, et al. Neurodegenerative disease status and post-mortem pathology in idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 443-453.
  • 78. Thannickal TC, Moore RY, Nienhuis R, et al. Reduced number of hypocretin neurons in human narcolepsy. Neuron 2000; 27: 469-474.
  • 79. Mahowald MW, Bundlie SR, Hurwitz TD, Schenck CH. Sleep violence–forensic science implications: polygraphic and video documentation. J Forensic Sci 1990; 35: 413-432.
  • 80. Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, et al. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). J Clin Sleep Med 2010; 6: 85-95.
  • 81. Howell MJ. Parasomnias: an updated review. Neurotherapeutics 2012; 9: 753-775.
  • 82. Devnani P, Fernandes R. Management of REM sleep behavior disorder: an evidence based review. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015; 18: 1-5.
  • 83. Schenck CH, Bundlie SR, Ettinger MG, Mahowald MW. Chronic behavioral disorders of human REM sleep: a new category of parasomnia. Sleep 1986; 9: 293-308.
  • 84. Schenck CH, Bundlie SR, Patterson AL, Mahowald MW. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. A treatable parasomnia affecting older adults. JAMA 1987; 257: 1786-1789.
  • 85. Schenck CH, Mahowald MW. REM sleep behavior disorder: clinical, developmental, and neuroscience perspectives 16 years after its formal identification in SLEEP. Sleep 2002; 25: 120-138.
  • 86. Anderson KN, Shneerson JM. Drug treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder: the use of drug therapies other than clonazepam. J Clin Sleep Med 2009; 5: 235-239.
  • 87. McCarter SJ, Boswell CL, St Louis EK, et al. Treatment outcomes in REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 237-242.
  • 88. Boeve BF, Silber MH, Ferman TJ. Melatonin for treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder in neurologic disorders: results in 14 patients. Sleep Med 2003; 4: 281-284.
  • 89. Vertrees S, Greenough GP. Ethical considerations in REM sleep behavior disorder. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19(1 Sleep Disorders): 199-203.
  • 90. Schenck CH, Montplaisir JY, Frauscher B, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: devising controlled active treatment studies for symptomatic and neuroprotective therapy–a consensus statement from the International Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder Study Group. Sleep Med 2013; 14: 795-806.
  • 91. Berg D, Postuma RB, Adler CH, et al. MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2015; 30: 1600-1611.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

The value of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated knee arthroplasty: a propensity score analysis

Justine Maree Naylor, Andrew Hart, Rajat Mittal, Ian Harris and Wei Xuan
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01362
Published online: 18 September 2017

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in models with or without an inpatient rehabilitation component.

Design, setting and participants: A propensity score-matched cohort of privately insured patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary, unilateral TKA in one of 12 Australian hospitals between August 2013 and January 2015 were included. Those discharged to an inpatient facility because of poor progress or who experienced significant complications within 90 days of surgery were excluded.

Intervention: Discharge after surgery to an inpatient rehabilitation facility or home.

Main outcome measures: Patient-reported knee pain and function (Oxford Knee Score; at 90 and 365 days after surgery) and health rating (EuroQol “today” health scale; at 35, 90 and 365 days). Inpatient and community-based rehabilitation provider charges were also assessed.

Results: 258 patients (129 pairs) from a sample of 332 were matched according to their propensity scores for receiving inpatient rehabilitation; covariates used in the matching included age, sex, body mass index, and markers of health and impairment. The only significant difference in outcomes was that EuroQol health scores were better on Day 35 for patients not undergoing inpatient rehabilitation (median difference, 5; IQR, –10 to 19; P = 0.01). Median rehabilitation provider charges were significantly higher for those discharged to inpatient therapy (total costs: median difference, $9500; IQR, $7000–11 497; P < 0.001; community therapy costs: median difference, $749; IQR, $0–1980; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Rehabilitation pathways incorporating inpatient rehabilitation did not achieve better joint-specific outcomes or health scores than alternatives not including inpatient rehabilitation. Given the substantial cost differences, better value alternatives should be considered for patients after uncomplicated TKA.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW



Acknowledgements: 

This study was partially supported by a grant from the HCF Research Foundation to Justine Naylor, Ian Harris and Wei Xuan. We acknowledge the contribution made by Helen Badge, project manager of the larger investigation in which this study was nested.

Competing interests:

This study was partially funded by a grant awarded by the HCF Research Foundation, but the funder had no influence on the study design or the research plan.

  • 1. Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry: hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty annual report 2016. Adelaide: AOA, 2016. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/275066/Hip%2C%20Knee%20%26%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty (accessed June 2017).
  • 2. Hart A, Bergeron SG, Epure L, et al. Comparison of US and Canadian perioperative outcomes and hospital efficiency after total hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA Surg 2015; 150: 990-998.
  • 3. Briggs T. A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England: getting it right first time. London: British Orthopaedic Association, 2015. https://www.boa.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GIRFT-National-Report-MarN.pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 4. Peel TN, Cheng AC, Liew D, et al. Direct hospital cost determinants following hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 2015; 67: 782-790.
  • 5. Health Insurance Consultants Australia. The growing cost of hip and knee replacements [media release]. 13 Feb 2014. http://www.hica.com.au/health-insurance-news/the-growing-cost-of-hip-and-knee-replacements (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 6. Health Insurance Consultants Australia. New prostheses list advisory committee could reduce private insurance costs [media release]. 12 Sept 2016. http://www.hica.com.au/health-insurance-news/new-prostheses-list-advisory-committee-could-reduce-private-insurance-costs (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 7. Buhagiar, MA, Naylor JM, Harris IA, et al. Hospital Inpatient versus HOme-based rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty (the HIHO study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 432.
  • 8. Buhagiar, MA, Naylor JM, Harris IA, et al. Effect of inpatient rehabilitation vs a monitored home program on mobility in patients with total knee arthroplasty: the HIHO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317: 1037-1046.
  • 9. Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, et al. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1673-1680.
  • 10. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41-55.
  • 11. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46: 399-424.
  • 12. D’Agostino RB. Tutorial in biostatistics. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265-2281.
  • 13. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2009; 28: 3083-3107.
  • 14. Naylor JM, Descallar J, Grootemaat M, et al. Is satisfaction with the acute-care experience higher amongst consumers treated in the private sector? A survey of public and private sector arthroplasty recipients. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0159799.
  • 15. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009; 250; 187-196.
  • 16. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89-B: 1010-1014.
  • 17. Chatterji R, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Descallar J. An equivalence study: are patient-completed and telephone interview equivalent modes of administration for the EuroQol survey? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15: 18.
  • 18. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 6401.0. Consumer price index inflation calculator 2015. http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/home/Consumer+Price+Index+Inflation+Calculator (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 19. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582-592.
  • 20. Ko V, Naylor J, Harris I, et al. One-to-one therapy is not superior to group or home-based therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, superiority trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 1942-1949.
  • 21. Christells N, Wallace S, Sage CE, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip and knee arthroplasty. Med J Aust 2015; 202: 363-369. <MJA full text>
  • 22. Hofstede SN, Nouta KA, Jacobs W, et al. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (2): CD003130.
  • 23. Verra WC, van den Boom LGH, Jacobs W, et al. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (10): CD004803.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Von Meyenburg complexes in a patient with obstructive jaundice

Vipin Gupta and Govind Makharia
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01344
Published online: 18 September 2017

Biliary hamartomas were an incidental finding in a 33-year-old man who was investigated for recurrent episodes of biliary colic. A T2-weighted coronal image showed multiple small hyperintense lesions of similar size scattered in both lobes of the liver (Figure). Biliary microhamartomas (von Meyenburg complexes) are rare and usually multiple. They occur because of ductal plate malformation and are composed of dilated intralobular and interlobular bile ducts.1 They generally remain asymptomatic and do not affect liver functions, and are most commonly detected incidentally.2 Differential diagnosis of this rare clinical entity includes multiple simple liver cysts, Caroli disease and, less commonly, metastatic liver disease (with necrosis).


  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India


Correspondence: govindmakharia@gmail.com

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Desmet VJ. Ludwig symposium on biliary disorders — part I. Pathogenesis of ductal plate abnormalities. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 80-89.
  • 2. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vilgrain V, et al. Fibropolycystic liver disease: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2005; 25: 659-670.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Thunderstorm asthma outbreak of November 2016: a natural disaster requiring planning

Steven J Lindstrom, Jeremy D Silver, Michael F Sutherland, Andrew BA Treloar, Ed Newbigin, Christine F McDonald and Jo A Douglass
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00285
Published online: 18 September 2017

Learning from a tragedy to increase public awareness and improve responses in future thunderstorm asthma events

Thunderstorm asthma is the occurrence of acute asthma either during or immediately after a thunderstorm and it is often characterised by a surge in emergency asthma presentations. The epidemic of thunderstorm asthma in Melbourne, Australia, on 21 November 2016 was the most extreme such event ever worldwide, with nine fatalities currently the subject of a coronial inquiry.1,2 Hospitals and ambulance services were placed under record pressure, and supplies of reliever medications were exhausted at some health services.1 Key tasks for the future are to predict the thunderstorms most likely to lead to asthma outbreaks and to define how best to respond. Further research to better anticipate these outbreaks is crucial and planning for the inevitable recurrence must occur at patient, institutional and state-wide levels.


  • 1 Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 NSW Regional Office, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Sydney, NSW
  • 4 Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC



Acknowledgements: 

We thank Edwin Lampugnani (University of Melbourne) for kindly supplying the image in . Jeremy Silver's work was funded by the MacKenzie Postdoctoral Fellowship scheme at the University of Melbourne.

Competing interests:

In the past 5 years, Jo Douglass has received honoraria for educational presentations from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Stallergenes Greer, Novartis, Alphapharm, Shire, Mundipharma and Seqirus; has sat on advisory boards for Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Astra-Zeneca, Pieris, Stallergenes Greer and Seqirus; and has undertaken contracted and investigator-initiated research for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Aventis. Jeremy Silver and Ed Newbigin are investigators on the National Medical and Health Research Council PBH grant 1116107, which partners with Stallergenes Greer. Christine McDonald has received honoraria for education presentations or advisory board participation from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Pfizer.

  • 1. Inspector-General for Emergency Management. Review of response to the thunderstorm asthma event of 21–22 November 2016: final report. Melbourne: State of Victoria; 2017. http://www.igem.vic.gov.au/documents/CD/17/233820 (accessed June 2017).
  • 2. Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. The November 2016 Victorian epidemic thunderstorm asthma event: an assessment of the health impacts. The Chief Health Officer’s report, 27 April 2017. Melbourne: State of Victoria, 2017. https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/emergencies/thunderstorm-asthma-event/response (accessed June 2017).
  • 3. Queensland University of Technology. Final report: literature review on thunderstorm asthma and its implications for public health advice. https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/researchandreports/thunderstorm-asthma-literature-review-may-2107 (accessed June 2017).
  • 4. Marks GB, Colquhoun JR, Girgis ST, et al. Thunderstorm outflows preceding epidemics of asthma during spring and summer. Thorax 2001; 56: 468-471.
  • 5. Girgis ST, Marks GB, Downs SH, et al. Thunderstorm-associated asthma in an inland town in south-eastern Australia. Who is at risk? Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 3-8.
  • 6. Adams RJ, Fuhlbrigge AL, Finkelstein JA, Weiss ST. Intranasal steroids and the risk of emergency department visits for asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002; 109: 636-642.
  • 7. Erbas B, Akram M, Dharmage SC, et al. The role of seasonal grass pollen on childhood asthma emergency department presentations. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42: 799-805.
  • 8. Egan P. Weather or not. Med J Aust 1985; 142: 330-330.
  • 9. Bellomo R, Gigliotti P, Treloar A, et al. Two consecutive thunderstorm associated epidemics of asthma in the city of Melbourne. The possible role of rye grass pollen. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 834-837.
  • 10. Howden ML, McDonald CF, Sutherland MF. Thunderstorm asthma — a timely reminder. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 512-513. <MJA full text>
  • 11. Eifan AO, Durham SR. Pathogenesis of rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2016; 46: 1139-1151.
  • 12. Brożek JL, Bousquet J, Agache I, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines — 2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 13. Peat JK, Tovey E, Mellis CM, et al. Importance of house dust mite and Alternaria allergens in childhood asthma: an epidemiological study in two climatic regions of Australia. Clin Exp Allergy 1993; 23: 812-820.
  • 14. Pulimood TB, Corden JM, Bryden C, et al. Epidemic asthma and the role of the fungal mold Alternaria alternata. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 610-617.
  • 15. Suissa S, Ernst P, Benayoun S, et al. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma. N Engl J Med 2000: 343: 332-336.
  • 16. National Asthma Council Australia [website]. Australian asthma handbook; version 1.2. Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, 2016. http://www.asthmahandbook.org.au (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 17. Abramson MJ, Puy RM, Weiner JM. Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 8: CD001186.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Public reporting of clinician-level data

Rachel Canaway, Marie M Bismark, David Dunt and Margaret A Kelaher
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01402
Published online: 18 September 2017

There is much debate about public disclosure of individual doctors’ performance to increase hospital quality and safety, but research is lacking

In 2016, media coverage of a cluster of preventable deaths of babies born at a Victorian health service1 shone a spotlight in Australia on the role of public reporting of hospital performance data in assuring quality and safety. The subsequent Victorian government review2 suggested that the Victorian health system must develop a culture of candour with improved transparency at every level of the hospital system “through greater public reporting of outcomes data and support for a just culture in hospitals”.2 Other failures in hospital quality have similarly triggered inquiries and health system reform in Australia.3,4 For example, Queensland’s Bundaberg Hospital scandal in 2005 triggered changes to public reporting to further encourage cultures in hospitals to move away from the “name–shame–blame” approach.5


  • Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: mkelaher@unimelb.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Medew J. Hundreds more baby deaths revealed in Victorian hospitals. The Age 2017; 28 June. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hundreds-more-baby-deaths-revealed-in-victorian-hospitals-20160628-gpu0sh.html (accessed Aug 2017).
  • 2. Duckett S, Cuddihy M, Newnham H. Targeting zero: supporting the Victorian hospital system to eliminate avoidable harm and strengthen quality of care. Report of the Review of Hospital Safety and Quality Assurance in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Government, 2016.
  • 3. Scott IA, Ward M. Public reporting of hospital outcomes based on administrative data: risks and opportunities. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 571-575. <MJA full text>
  • 4. Marasco SF, Ibrahim JE, Oakley J. Public disclosure of surgeon-specific report cards: current status of the debate. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75: 1000-1004.
  • 5. Duckett SJ, Collins J, Kamp M, Walker K. An improvement focus in public reporting: the Queensland approach. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 616-617. <MJA full text>
  • 6. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 1-history, rationale, consequences. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: S2-S11.
  • 7. Pearse J, Mazevska D. The impact of public disclosure of health performance data: a rapid review. Sydney: Sax Institute, 2012.
  • 8. Rechel B, McKee M, Haas M, et al. Public reporting on quality, waiting times and patient experience in 11 high-income countries. Health Policy 2016; 120: 377-383.
  • 9. Minami CA, Dahlke A, Bilimoria KY. Public reporting in surgery: an emerging opportunity to improve care and inform patients. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 241-242.
  • 10. Campanella P, Vukovic V, Parente P, et al. The impact of public reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 296.
  • 11. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M. Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff 2005; 24: 1150-1160.
  • 12. Oakley J. Surgeon report cards, clinical realities, and the quality of patient care. Monash Bioeth Rev 2009; 28: 21.1-21.6.
  • 13. Behrendt K, Groene O. Mechanisms and effects of public reporting of surgeon outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Health Policy 2016; 120: 1151-1161.
  • 14. Faber M, Bosch M, Wollersheim H, et al. Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care 2009; 47: 1-8.
  • 15. Henderson A. Surgical report cards: the myth and the reality. Monash Bioeth Rev 2009; 28: 20.01-20.20.
  • 16. Mannion R, Braithwaite J. Unintended consequences of performance measurement in healthcare: 20 salutary lessons from the English National Health Service. Intern Med J 2012; 42: 569-574.
  • 17. Gallagher MP, Krumholz HM. Public reporting of hospital outcomes: a challenging road ahead. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 658-660. <MJA full text>
  • 18. Azzam DG, Neo CA, Itotoh FE, Aitken RJ. The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: outcomes from the first 10 years. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 539-542. <MJA full text>
  • 19. Ganai S. Disclosure of surgeon experience. World J Surg 2014; 38: 1622-1625.
  • 20. Sherman KL, Gordon EJ, Mahvi DM, et al. Surgeons’ perceptions of public reporting of hospital and individual surgeon quality. Med Care 2013; 51: 1069-1075.
  • 21. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 2 – implementation. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: S12-S23.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Road safety: serious injuries remain a major unsolved problem

Ben Beck, Peter A Cameron, Mark C Fitzgerald, Rodney T Judson, Warwick Teague, Ronan A Lyons and Belinda J Gabbe
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00015
Published online: 11 September 2017

Abstract

Objective: To investigate temporal trends in the incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and costs of health loss caused by serious road traffic injury.

Design, setting and participants: A retrospective review of data from the population-based Victorian State Trauma Registry and the National Coronial Information System on road traffic-related deaths (pre- and in-hospital) and major trauma (Injury Severity Score > 12) during 2007–2015.

Main outcomes and measures: Temporal trends in the incidence of road traffic-related major trauma, mortality, DALYs, and costs of health loss, by road user type.

Results: There were 8066 hospitalised road traffic major trauma cases and 2588 road traffic fatalities in Victoria over the 9-year study period. There was no change in the incidence of hospitalised major trauma for motor vehicle occupants (incidence rate ratio [IRR] per year, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99–1.01; P = 0.70), motorcyclists (IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97–1.01; P = 0.45) or pedestrians (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.02; P = 0.73), but the incidence for pedal cyclists increased 8% per year (IRR, 1.08; 95% CI; 1.05–1.10; P < 0.001). While DALYs declined for motor vehicle occupants (by 13% between 2007 and 2015), motorcyclists (32%), and pedestrians (5%), there was a 56% increase in DALYs for pedal cyclists. The estimated costs of health loss associated with road traffic injuries exceeded $14 billion during 2007–2015, although the cost per patient declined for all road user groups.

Conclusions: As serious injury rates have not declined, current road safety targets will be difficult to meet. Greater attention to preventing serious injury is needed, as is further investment in road safety, particularly for pedal cyclists.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 Private Medical Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne
  • 6 Farr Institute, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom


Correspondence: ben.beck@monash.edu

Acknowledgements: 

The Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) is funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, the State Government of Victoria, and the Transport Accident Commission. Ben Beck received salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC) Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) Centre of Research Excellence (1029983). Peter Cameron was supported by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (545926) and Belinda Gabbe by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (GNT1048731). Warwick Teague’s role as director of trauma services at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, is supported by a grant from the Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation. We thank the Victorian State Trauma Outcome Registry and Monitoring (VSTORM) group for providing VSTR data. We also thank Sue McLellan for her assistance with the data, Pam Simpson for her statistical support, and David Attwood from the Transport Accident Commission for his suggestions and advice.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev 2016; 22: 3-18.
  • 2. Henley G, Harrison JE. Trends in injury deaths, Australia: 1999–00 to 2009–10 (AIHW Cat. No. INJCAT 150; Injury Research and Statistics Series No. 74). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2015.
  • 3. Gabbe BJ, Lyons RA, Fitzgerald MC, et al. Reduced population burden of road transport-related major trauma after introduction of an inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 565-572.
  • 4. Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, Cooper DJ, et al. A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 546-550. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Gabbe BJ, Sutherland AM, Hart MJ, et al. Population-based capture of long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after major trauma: the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2010; 69: 532-536.
  • 6. Henley G, Harrison JE. Trends in serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia: 2000–01 to 2008–09 (AIHW Cat. No. INJCAT 142). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012.
  • 7. Lyons RA, Ward H, Brunt H, et al. Using multiple datasets to understand trends in serious road traffic casualties. Accid Anal Prev 2008; 40: 1406-1410.
  • 8. Cameron PA, Finch CF, Gabbe BJ, et al. Developing Australia’s first statewide trauma registry: what are the lessons? ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 424-428.
  • 9. Palmer CS, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA. Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale. Injury 2016; 47: 109-115.
  • 10. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72.
  • 11. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-1108.
  • 12. Gabbe BJ, Lyons RA, Sutherland AM, et al. Level of agreement between patient and proxy responses to the EQ-5D health questionnaire 12 months after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72: 1102-1105.
  • 13. Gabbe BJ, Lyons RA, Simpson PM, et al. Disability weights based on patient-reported data from a multinational injury cohort. Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94: 806-816.
  • 14. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3302.0.55.001. Life tables, states, territories and Australia, 2013–2015. Oct 2016. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3302.0.55.001 (accessed Dec 2016).
  • 15. Murray CJ, Acharya AK. Understanding DALYs. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 703-730.
  • 16. Prüss-Ustün A, Mathers C, Corvalán C, Woodward A. Introduction and methods: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels (Environmental Burden of Disease Series No. 1). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/9241546204/en/ (accessed Dec 2016).
  • 17. Australian Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Office of Best Practice. Best practice regulation guidance note: Value of statistical life. Dec 2014. https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/Value_of_Statistical_Life_guidance_note.pdf (accessed Dec 2016).
  • 18. Sanford T, McCulloch CE, Callcut RA, et al. Bicycle trauma injuries and hospital admissions in the United States, 1998–2013. JAMA 2015; 314: 947-949.
  • 19. Sikic M, Mikocka-Walus AA, Gabbe BJ, et al. Bicycling injuries and mortality in Victoria, 2001–2006. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 353-356.
  • 20. Australian Bicycle Council. Gearing up for active and sustainable communities. The Australian national cycling strategy 2011–2016 (Austroads Publication No. AP-C85/10). Sydney: Austroads, 2010. http://www.bicyclecouncil.com.au/files/publication/National-Cycling-Strategy-2011-2016.pdf (accessed Dec 2016).
  • 21. Walls HL, Curtis AJ, Stevenson CE, et al. Reductions in transport mortality in Australia: evidence of a public health success. Accid Anal Prev 2012; 49: 520-524.
  • 22. Belin M-Å, Tillgren P, Vedung E. Vision Zero — a road safety policy innovation. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2012; 19: 171-179.
  • 23. Victorian State Government. Towards Zero 2016–2020: Victoria’s road safety strategy and action plan 2016. Melbourne: Victoria State Government, 2016. https://www.towardszero.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/183556/STU_0206_RS_STRATEGY_2016_web.pdf (accessed July 2016).
  • 24. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/ (accessed Dec 2016).
  • 25. Lyons RA, Kendrick D, Towner EM, et al. Measuring the population burden of injuries — implications for global and national estimates: a multi-centre prospective UK longitudinal study. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e1001140.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Pagination

Subscribe to