Connect
MJA
MJA

Assisted reproductive technologies: new guidance for women and doctors is welcome

Stephen J Robson and Caroline M de Costa
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00449
Published online: 7 August 2017

A new approach better informs women and doctors about what assisted reproductive technologies can achieve in 2017

Since the first Australian conceived by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) was born in 1980, this and other assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) have come a long way in scope, availability, and success rates. About 4% of all Australian births are now made possible by ART,1 equivalent to one child in every classroom.


  • 1 Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra, ACT
  • 2 Australian National University, Canberra, ACT
  • 3 James Cook University, Cairns, QLD


Correspondence: caroline.decosta@jcu.edu.au

Competing interests:

Stephen Robson is a paid member of the Medical Benefits Schedule Review and provides in vitro fertilisation services, but does not own any shares in an IVF unit.

  • 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s mothers and babies 2013 — in brief (AIHW Cat. No. PER 72; Perinatal Statistics Series No. 31). Canberra: AIHW, 2015.
  • 2. Chambers GM, Huang VP, Sullivan EA, et al. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 191-198.
  • 3. Clark A. National fertility study 2006. Australians’ experience and knowledge of fertility issues (PowerPoint). www.fertilitysociety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/preservation-of-fertility-presentation-2006.ppt#1 (accessed May 2017).
  • 4. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506-1512.
  • 5. Collins J. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 2001; 19: 279-290.
  • 6. Mladovsky P, Sorenson C. Public financing of IVF: a review of policy rationales. Health Care Anal 2010; 18: 113-128.
  • 7. Chambers GM, Zhu R, Hoang V, Illingworth PJ. A reduction in public health funding for fertility treatment — an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 142.
  • 8. Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Illingworth PJ. Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 3111-3117.
  • 9. Chambers GM, Paul RC, Harris K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success. Med J Aust 2017; 207: 114-118.
  • 10. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37: 451-463.
  • 11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 25 years of health expenditure in Australia 1989–0 to 2013–14 (AIHW Cat. No. HWE 63; Health and Welfare Expenditure Series No. 56). Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
  • 12. Boxall A. What are we doing to ensure the sustainability of the health system? (Research paper no. 4, 2011–12). Parliamentary Library, 18 Nov 2011. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1112/12rp04 (accessed May 2017).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

How to measure a QT interval

Kathryn Waddell-Smith, Robert M Gow and Jonathan R Skinner
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00442
Published online: 7 August 2017

A standard approach in QT measurement improves communication between clinicians

An abnormally prolonged QT interval is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.1 Some professional bodies recommend national population-based screening programs to detect QT prolongation.2 Familial long QT syndrome (LQTS) may remain undetected because of misdiagnosis (eg, as a seizure disorder)3 or through failure to measure the QT interval correctly.4 Psychiatrists fear the QT prolongation caused by many psychotropic medications,5 and it may also be seen during periods of hypothermia; electrolyte imbalance (such as hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia and hypocalcaemia); in the setting of raised intracranial pressure or post-cardiac arrest; with other medications, such as type 1A, 1C and III antiarrhythmic agents; and with antihistamines and macrolide antibiotics.


  • 1 Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 2 Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada


Correspondence: jskinner@adhb.govt.nz

Competing interests:

Jon Skinner has no relevant disclosures. Kathryn Waddell-Smith is supported by grants from the Green Lane Research and Educational Fund and the National Heart Foundation, New Zealand.

  • 1. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, et al. HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 1932-1963.
  • 2. Earle N, Crawford J, Smith W, et al. Community detection of long QT syndrome with a clinical registry: an alternative to ECG screening programs? Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 233-238.
  • 3. MacCormick JM, McAlister H, Crawford J, et al. Misdiagnosis of long QT syndrome as epilepsy at first presentation. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54: 26-32.
  • 4. Viskin S, Rosovski U, Sands AJ, et al. Inaccurate electrocardiographic interpretation of long QT: the majority of physicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 569-574.
  • 5. Wenzel-Seifert K, Wittmann M, Haen E. QTc prolongation by psychotropic drugs and the risk of Torsade de Pointes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108: 687-693.
  • 6. Taggart NW, Haglund CM, Tester DJ, et al. Diagnostic miscues in congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2007; 115: 2613-2620.
  • 7. Lepeschkin E, Surawicz B. The measurement of the Q-T interval of the electrocardiogram. Circulation 1952; 6: 378-388.
  • 8. Malik M. Beat-to-beat QT variability and cardiac autonomic regulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 295: H923-H925.
  • 9. Anderson ME, Al-Khatib SM, Roden DM, et al. Cardiac repolarization: current knowledge, critical gaps, and new approaches to drug development and patient management. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 769-781.
  • 10. Hofman N, Wilde AA, Kaab S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for congenital long QT syndrome in the era of molecular genetics: do we need a scoring system? Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 575-580.
  • 11. Hobbs JB, Peterson DR, Moss AJ, et al. Risk of aborted cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death during adolescence in the long-QT syndrome. JAMA 2006; 296: 1249-1254.
  • 12. Morganroth J, Brozovich FV, McDonald JT, et al. Variability of the QT measurement in healthy men, with implications for selection of an abnormal QT value to predict drug toxicity and proarrhythmia. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 774-776.
  • 13. Tutar HE, Ocal B, Imamoglu A, et al. Dispersion of QT and QTc interval in healthy children, and effects of sinus arrhythmia on QT dispersion. Heart 1998; 80: 77-79.
  • 14. Postema PG, Wilde AA. The measurement of the QT interval. Curr Cardiol Rev 2014; 10: 287-294.
  • 15. Malik M. Errors and misconceptions in ECG measurement used for the detection of drug induced QT interval prolongation. J Electrocardiol 2004; 37 Suppl: 25-33.
  • 16. Talbot S. QT interval in right and left bundle-branch block. Br Heart J 1973; 35: 288-291.
  • 17. Drezner JA, Ackerman MJ, Cannon BC, et al. Abnormal electrocardiographic findings in athletes: recognising changes suggestive of primary electrical disease. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 153-167.
  • 18. Funck-Brentano C, Jaillon P. Rate-corrected QT interval: techniques and limitations. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 17B-22B.
  • 19. Berger WR, Gow RM, Kamberi S, et al. The QT and corrected QT interval in recovery after exercise in children. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4(4): 448-455.
  • 20. Drew BJ, Califf RM, Funk M, et al. Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Circulation 2004; 110: 2721-2746.
  • 21. Moss AJ. Measurement of the QT interval and the risk associated with QTc interval prolongation: A review. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 23B-25B.
  • 22. Waddell-Smith KE, Skinner JR; members of the CSANZ Genetics Council Writing Group. Update on the diagnosis and management of familial long QT syndrome. Heart Lung Circ 2016; 25: 769-776.
  • 23. Zhang L, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, et al. Spectrum of ST-T-wave patterns and repolarization parameters in congenital long-QT syndrome: ECG findings identify genotypes. Circulation 2000; 102: 2849-2855.
  • 24. Monnig G, Eckardt L, Wedekind H, et al. Electrocardiographic risk stratification in families with congenital long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2074-2080.
  • 25. Postema PG, De Jong JS, Van der Bilt IA, et al. Accurate electrocardiographic assessment of the QT interval: teach the tangent. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5: 1015-1018.
  • 26. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 982-991.
  • 27. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Zareba W. QT interval: how to measure it and what is “normal”. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 333-336.
  • 28. Viskin S, Postema PG, Bhuiyan ZA, et al. The response of the QT interval to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing: a bedside test for diagnosing long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1955-1961.
  • 29. Sy RW, van der Werf C, Chattha IS, et al. Derivation and validation of a simple exercise-based algorithm for prediction of genetic testing in relatives of LQTS probands. Circulation 2011; 124: 2187-2194.
  • 30. Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. QTc behavior during exercise and genetic testing for the long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2011; 124: 2181-2184.
  • 31. Aziz PF, Wieand TS, Ganley J, et al. Genotype- and mutation site-specific QT adaptation during exercise, recovery, and postural changes in children with long-QT syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4: 867-873.
  • 32. Kaufman ES, Priori SG, Napolitano C, et al. Electrocardiographic prediction of abnormal genotype in congenital long QT syndrome: experience in 101 related family members. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12: 455-461.
  • 33. Mauriello DA, Johnson JN, Ackerman MJ. Holter monitoring in the evaluation of congenital long QT syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34: 1100-1104.
  • 34. Vaglio M, Couderc JP, McNitt S, et al. A quantitative assessment of T-wave morphology in LQT1, LQT2, and healthy individuals based on Holter recording technology. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5: 11-18.
  • 35. Page A, Aktas MK, Soyata T, et al. “QT clock” to improve detection of QT prolongation in long QT syndrome patients. Heart Rhythm 2016; 13: 190-198.
  • 36. Bazett H. An analysis of the time relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920; 7: 353-370.
  • 37. Milne JR, Ward DE, Spurrell RA, et al. The ventricular paced QT interval–the effects of rate and exercise. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1982; 5: 352-358.
  • 38. Rijnbeek PR, van Herpen G, Bots ML, et al. Normal values of the electrocardiogram for ages 16-90 years. J Electrocardiol 2014; 47: 914-921.
  • 39. Barsheshet A, Peterson DR, Moss AJ, et al. Genotype-specific QT correction for heart rate and the risk of life-threatening cardiac events in adolescents with congenital long-QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8: 1207-1213.
  • 40. Vincent GM, Timothy KW, Leppert M, et al. The spectrum of symptoms and QT intervals in carriers of the gene for the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 846-852.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Performance data and informed consent: a duty to disclose?

Rebekah E McWhirter
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01195
Published online: 7 August 2017

Evidence mounts for a legal duty to disclose performance data as part of informed consent

Hospitals, colleges and other institutions increasingly collect, analyse and disseminate data relating to the performance of individual health practitioners, particularly those undertaking surgical procedures. Arguments have long been made for an ethical duty to disclose information regarding a practitioner’s experience or skill to patients as part of the process of informed consent (Box 1).1 Significantly, recent developments suggest that practitioners may, in some circumstances, have a legal duty to disclose their performance data to patients (Box 2).


  • Menzies Institute for Medical Research and Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS



Acknowledgements: 

I am grateful to Bill Madden for his comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Clarke S, Oakley J. Informed consent and surgeons’ performance. J Med Philos 2004; 29: 11-35.
  • 2. Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232.
  • 3. Brus v Australian Capital Territory [2007] ACTSC 83.
  • 4. G & C v Down [2008] SADC 135.
  • 5. Morocz v Marshman [2015] NSWSC 325.
  • 6. Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT); Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW); Personal Injuries (Liabilities and Damages) Act 2003 (NT); Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld); Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA); Civil Liability Act 2002 (Tas); Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic); Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA).
  • 7. Ipp DA, Cane P, Sheldon D, Macintosh I. Review of the law of negligence: final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2002.
  • 8. Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479.
  • 9. F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189.
  • 10. Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434.
  • 11. Brown DL, Clarke S, Oakley J. Cardiac surgeon report cards, referral for cardiac surgery, and the ethical responsibilities of cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2378-2382.
  • 12. Radford PD, Derbyshire LF, Shalhoub J, Fitzgerald JEF. Publication of surgeon specific outcome data: a review of implementation, controversies and the potential impact on surgical training. Int J Surg 2015; 13: 211-216.
  • 13. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Australian and New Zealand audit of surgical mortality: national report 2014. Adelaide: RACS, 2014. http://www.surgeons.org/media/22243780/2015-11-23_rpt_anzasm_report_2014.pdf (accessed June 2017).
  • 14. Medical Board of Australia. Guidelines for registered medical practitioners who perform cosmetic medical and surgical procedures. 1 October 2016. http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/News/2016-05-09-media-statement.aspx (accessed June 2017).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Specialist outreach services in regional and remote Australia: key drivers and policy implications

Belinda G O'Sullivan, Johannes U Stoelwinder and Matthew R McGrail
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00949
Published online: 7 August 2017

Promoting the supply, distribution and sustainability of rural outreach services requires multilevel policy development and regional service planning

The need for more local specialist services to support rural communities is well established as a significant issue in Australia. Although the specialist workforce is growing, providers are increasingly choosing to subspecialise and work in metropolitan practice.1 Access to medical specialists in major cities is consistently high at 162.1 full-time equivalent specialists per 100 000 population, but diminishes for people living in inner or outer regional (82.7 and 61.5 per 100 000 respectively) and remote areas (34.2 per 100 000).2


  • 1 School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, VIC
  • 2 School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC



Acknowledgements: 

This publication used data from the MABEL longitudinal survey of doctors conducted by the University of Melbourne and Monash University (the MABEL research team). Funding for MABEL comes from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Health Services Research grant, 2008–2011; Centre for Research Excellence in Medical Workforce Dynamics, 2012–2016) with additional support from the Department of Health (2008) and Health Workforce Australia (2013). Belinda O’Sullivan was supported by a Postgraduate Publications Award from Monash University.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Health Workforce Australia. Health workforce 2025. Vol 3: medical specialties. Adelaide: Health Workforce Australia, 2012. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/133228/20150419-0017/www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/HW2025_V3_FinalReport20121109.pdf (accessed Nov 2016).
  • 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Medical Workforce 2015. Canberra: AIHW, 2016. http://www.aihw.gov.au/workforce/medical/additional (accessed Nov 2016).
  • 3. de Roodenbeke E, Lucas S, Rouzaut A, Bana F. Outreach services as a strategy to increase access to health workers in remote and rural areas. (Technical Report No. 2). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501514_eng.pdf (accessed Nov 2016).
  • 4. Simm PJ, Wong N, Fraser L, et al. Geography does not limit optimal diabetes care: use of a tertiary centre model of care in an outreach service for type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Paediatr Child Health 2014; 50: 471-475.
  • 5. Gruen RL, Bailie RS, Wang Z, et al. Specialist outreach to isolated and disadvantaged communities: a population-based study. Lancet 2006; 368: 130-138.
  • 6. Thomas CL, O’Rourke PK, Wainwright CE. Clinical outcomes of Queensland children with cystic fibrosis: a comparison between tertiary centre and outreach services. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 135-139. <MJA full text>
  • 7. Medlin LG, Chang AB, Fong K, et al. Indigenous Respiratory Outreach Care: The first 18 months of a specialist respiratory outreach service to rural and remote Indigenous communities in Queensland, Australia. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38: 447-453.
  • 8. Ojo EO, Okoi E, Umoiyoho AJ, Nnamonu M. Surgical outreach program in poor rural Nigerian communities. Rural Remote Health 2013; 13: 2200.
  • 9. Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Holz FG, et al. Regular provision of outreach increases acceptance of cataract surgery in South India. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16: 1268-1275.
  • 10. O’Sullivan BG, Joyce CM, McGrail MR. Adoption, implementation and prioritization of specialist outreach policy in Australia: a national perspective. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92: 512-519.
  • 11. O’Sullivan B, Joyce C, McGrail M. Rural outreach by specialist doctors in Australia: a national cross-sectional study of supply and distribution. Hum Resour Health 2014; 12: 1-10.
  • 12. O'Sullivan BG, McGrail MR, Stoelwinder JU. Reasons why specialist doctors undertake rural outreach services: an Australian cross-sectional study. Hum Resour Health 2017; 15: 1-7.
  • 13. O’Sullivan B, McGrail M, Joyce C, Stoelwinder J. Service distribution and models of rural outreach by specialist doctors in Australia: a national cross-sectional study. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40: 330-336.
  • 14. O’Sullivan B, Stoelwinder J, McGrail M. The stability of rural outreach services: a national longitudinal study of specialist doctors. Med J Aust 2015; 203: 297. <MJA full text>
  • 15. O'Sullivan B. Rural outreach by specialist doctors in Australia [PhD thesis]. Melbourne: Monash University, 2016. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/1268685 (accessed June 2017).
  • 16. O’Sullivan B, McGrail M, Stoelwinder J. Subsidies to target specialist outreach services into more remote locations: a national cross-sectional study. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41: 344-350.
  • 17. Turner AW, Mulholland WJ, Taylor HR. Coordination of outreach eye services in remote Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 344-349.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

The Australian Snakebite Project, 2005–2015 (ASP-20)

Christopher I Johnston, Nicole M Ryan, Colin B Page, Nicholas A Buckley, Simon GA Brown, Margaret A O'Leary and Geoffrey K Isbister
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00094
Published online: 31 July 2017

Abstract

Objective: To describe the epidemiology, treatment and adverse events after snakebite in Australia.

Design: Prospective, multicentre study of data on patients with snakebites recruited to the Australian Snakebite Project (2005–2015) and data from the National Coronial Information System.

Setting, participants: Patients presenting to Australian hospitals with suspected or confirmed snakebites from July 2005 to June 2015 and consenting to participation.

Main outcome measures: Demographic data, circumstances of bites, clinical effects of envenoming, results of laboratory investigations and snake venom detection kit (SVDK) testing, antivenom treatment and adverse reactions, time to discharge, deaths.

Results: 1548 patients with suspected snakebites were enrolled, including 835 envenomed patients (median, 87 per year), for 718 of which the snake type was definitively established, most frequently brown snakes (41%), tiger snakes (17%) and red-bellied black snakes (16%). Clinical effects included venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (73%), myotoxicity (17%), and acute kidney injury (12%); severe complications included cardiac arrest (25 cases; 2.9%) and major haemorrhage (13 cases; 1.6%). There were 23 deaths (median, two per year), attributed to brown (17), tiger (four) and unknown (two) snakes; ten followed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and six followed intracranial haemorrhages. Of 597 SVDK test results for envenomed patients with confirmed snake type, 29 (4.9%) were incorrect; 133 of 364 SVDK test results for non-envenomed patients (36%) were false positives. 755 patients received antivenom, including 49 non-envenomed patients; 178 (24%), including ten non-envenomed patients, had systemic hypersensitivity reactions, of which 45 (6%) were severe (hypotension, hypoxaemia). Median total antivenom dose declined from four vials to one, but median time to first antivenom was unchanged (4.3 hours; IQR, 2.7–6.3 hours).

Conclusions: Snake envenoming is uncommon in Australia, but is often severe. SVDKs were unreliable for determining snake type. The median antivenom dose has declined without harming patients. Improved early diagnostic strategies are needed to reduce the frequently long delays before antivenom administration.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 NSW Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 3 Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 4 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 5 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
  • 6 Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine (CCREM), Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA


Correspondence: geoff.isbister@gmail.com

Acknowledgements: 

Geoffrey Isbister is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellowship (1061041). Nicole Ryan is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. Colin Page is funded by a Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation Fellowship. The study described in this article is funded by an NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence Grant (1110343). We acknowledge the help of numerous critical care nurses and medical staff who assisted in recruiting patients to the study, and the local investigators at hospitals around Australia.

Competing interests:

Christopher Johnston is employed by Boehringer Ingelheim; this research was independent of his employment by Boehringer Ingelheim.

  • 1. Sutherland SK, Tibballs J. Australian animal toxins: the creatures, their toxins and care of the poisoned patient. 2nd edition. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 2. Sutherland SK. Deaths from snake bite in Australia, 1981–1991. Med J Aust 1992; 157: 740-746.
  • 3. Sutherland SK, Leonard RL. Snakebite deaths in Australia 1992–1994 and a management update. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 616-618.
  • 4. Winkel KD, Mirtschin P, Pearn J. Twentieth century toxinology and antivenom development in Australia. Toxicon 2006; 48: 738-754.
  • 5. White J. A clinician’s guide to Australian venomous bites and stings: incorporating the updated CSL antivenom handbook. Melbourne: CSL, 2012.
  • 6. Munro JG, Pearn JH. Snake bite in children: a five year population study from South-East Queensland. Aust Paediatr J 1978; 14: 248-253.
  • 7. Jamieson R, Pearn J. An epidemiological and clinical study of snake-bites in childhood. Med J Aust 1989; 150: 698-702.
  • 8. Jelinek GA, Breheny FX. Ten years of snake bites at Fremantle Hospital. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 658-661.
  • 9. Mead HJ, Jelinek GA. Suspected snakebite in children: a study of 156 patients over 10 years. Med J Aust 1996; 164: 467-470. <MJA full text>
  • 10. Tibballs J. Diagnosis and treatment of confirmed and suspected snake bite. Implications from an analysis of 46 paediatric cases. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 270-274.
  • 11. Fisher MM, Bowey CJ. Urban envenomation. Med J Aust 1989; 150: 695-698.
  • 12. Barrett R, Little M. Five years of snake envenoming in far north Queensland. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2003; 15: 500-510.
  • 13. Currie BJ. Snakebite in tropical Australia: a prospective study in the “Top End” of the Northern Territory. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 693-697. <MJA full text>
  • 14. Yeung JM, Little M, Murray LM, et al. Antivenom dosing in 35 patients with severe brown snake (Pseudonaja) envenoming in Western Australia over 10 years. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 703-705. <MJA full text>
  • 15. de Silva HA, Ryan NM, de Silva HJ. Adverse reactions to snake antivenom, and their prevention and treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 81: 446-452.
  • 16. Currie BJ. Treatment of snakebite in Australia: the current evidence base and questions requiring collaborative multicentre prospective studies. Toxicon 2006; 48: 941-956.
  • 17. Kulawickrama S, O’Leary MA, Hodgson WC, et al. Development of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for measuring taipan venom in serum. Toxicon 2010; 55: 1510-1518.
  • 18. Johnston CI, Ryan NM, O’Leary MA, et al. Australian taipan (Oxyuranus spp.) envenoming: clinical effects and potential benefits of early antivenom therapy — Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-25). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2017; 55: 115-122.
  • 19. Ireland G, Brown SG, Buckley NA, et al. Changes in serial laboratory test results in snakebite patients: when can we safely exclude envenoming? Med J Aust 2010; 193: 285-290. <MJA full text>
  • 20. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report — Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 391-397.
  • 21. Brown SG. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114: 371-376.
  • 22. Bugeja L, Ibrahim JE, Ferrah N, et al. The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14: 28.
  • 23. Johnston CI, O’Leary MA, Brown SG, et al. Death adder envenoming causes neurotoxicity not reversed by antivenom — Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-16). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012; 6: e1841.
  • 24. Isbister GK, O’Leary MA, Elliott M, Brown SG. Tiger snake (Notechis spp) envenoming: Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-13). Med J Aust 2012; 197: 173-177. <MJA full text>
  • 25. Johnston CI, Brown SG, O’Leary MA, et al. Mulga snake (Pseudechis australis) envenoming: a spectrum of myotoxicity, anticoagulant coagulopathy, haemolysis and the role of early antivenom therapy — Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-19). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2013; 51: 417-424.
  • 26. Churchman A, O’Leary MA, Buckley NA, et al. Clinical effects of red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) envenoming and correlation with venom concentrations: Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-11). Med J Aust 2010; 193: 696-700. <MJA full text>
  • 27. Allen GE, Brown SG, Buckley NA, et al. Clinical effects and antivenom dosing in brown snake (Pseudonaja spp.) envenoming — Australian snakebite project (ASP-14). PLoS One 2012; 7: e53188.
  • 28. Nimorakiotakis VB, Winkel KD. Prospective assessment of the false positive rate of the Australian snake venom detection kit in healthy human samples. Toxicon 2016; 111: 143-146.
  • 29. Isbister GK, Brown SG, Page CB, et al. Snakebite in Australia: a practical approach to diagnosis and treatment. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 763-768. <MJA full text>
  • 30. Maduwage K, O’Leary MA, Isbister GK. Diagnosis of snake envenomation using a simple phospholipase A2 assay. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 4827.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success

Georgina M Chambers, Repon C Paul, Katie Harris, Oisin Fitzgerald, Clare V Boothroyd, Luk Rombauts, Michael G Chapman and Louisa Jorm
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01435
Published online: 24 July 2017

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles).

Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow-up of 56 652 women commencing ART in Australian and New Zealand during 2009–2012, and followed until 2014 or the first treatment-dependent live birth.

Main outcome measures: CLBRs and cycle-specific live birth rates were calculated for up to eight cycles, stratified by the age of the women (< 30, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, > 44 years). Conservative CLBRs assumed that women discontinuing treatment had no chance of achieving a live birth if had they continued treatment; optimal CLBRs assumed that they would have had the same chance as women who continued treatment.

Results: The overall CLBR was 32.7% (95% CI, 32.2–33.1%) in the first cycle, rising by the eighth cycle to 54.3% (95% CI, 53.9–54.7%) (conservative) and 77.2% (95% CI, 76.5–77.9%) (optimal). The CLBR decreased with age and number of complete cycles. For women who commenced ART treatment before 30 years of age, the CLBR for the first complete cycle was 43.7% (95% CI, 42.6–44.7%), rising to 69.2% (95% CI, 68.2–70.1%) (conservative) and 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6–94.0) (optimal) for the seventh cycle. For women aged 40–44 years, the CLBR was 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1–11.3%) for the first complete cycle, rising to 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2–21.8%) (conservative) and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.9–39.9%) (optimal) for the eighth cycle.

Conclusion: CLBRs based on complete cycles are meaningful estimates of ART success, reflecting contemporary clinical practice and encouraging safe practice. These estimates can be used when counselling patients and to inform public policy on ART treatment.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Care Fertility, Brisbane, QLD
  • 3 Monash IVF, Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 IVF Australia Southern Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 5 Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: g.chambers@unsw.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

The Fertility Society of Australia funds the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproductive Database (ANZARD). We acknowledge the provision of data to ANZARD by Australian and New Zealand fertility clinics.

Competing interests:

The Fertility Society of Australia funds the National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit to manage ANZARD and conduct national reporting of ART in Australia and New Zealand. Georgina Chambers is employed by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) and is director of the National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit at UNSW. She has received an institutional research grant unrelated to this study from the Australian Research Council for which Virtus Health, a publicly listed IVF company, was the partner organisation (2010–2013). Clare Boothroyd owns a facility that offers ART, and has received funding from MSD, Merck-Serono, and Ferring for work unrelated to this article. Luk Rombauts has a minority shareholding in the Monash IVF Group, a publicly listed IVF company, and has received funding from MSD, Merck-Serono, and Ferring for work unrelated to this article. Michael Chapman has a minority shareholding in Virtus Health, and has received funding from MSD, Merck-Serono, and Ferring for work unrelated to this article.

  • 1. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21: 411-426.
  • 2. Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: a population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Aust N Z J Public Health 2009; 33: 358-364.
  • 3. Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 1588-1609.
  • 4. Harris K, Fitzgerald O, Paul R, et al. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales, 2016. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/npesu/data_collection/Assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20in%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%202014_0.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2013 Assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic success rates report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2013-report/art-2013-fertility-clinic-report.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 6. Kupka MS, D’Hooghe T, Ferraretti AP, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 1638-1652.
  • 7. Chambers GM, Wand H, Macaldowie A, et al. Population trends and live birth rates associated with common ART treatment strategies. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 2632-2641.
  • 8. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple pregnancy associated with infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (5 Suppl 1): S106-S110.
  • 9. Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, et al. Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum Fertil 2008; 11: 131-146.
  • 10. Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2703-2707.
  • 11. Moragianni VA, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22: 189-192.
  • 12. Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L, et al. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 652-669.
  • 13. McLernon DJ, Maheshwari A, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: a population-based study of linked cycle data from 178 898 women. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 572-581.
  • 14. Smith AC, Tilling K, Nelson SM, et al. Live-birth rate associated with repeat in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. JAMA 2015; 314: 2654-2662.
  • 15. Malizia BA, Hacker MR, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 236-243.
  • 16. Stern JE, Brown MB, Luke B, et al. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1334-1340.
  • 17. van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, et al. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 577-589.
  • 18. Chambers GM, Zhu R, Hoang V, et al. A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment: an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 142.
  • 19. Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Sullivan EA, et al. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 191-198.e4.
  • 20. Hamilton BH, McManus B. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econ 2012; 21: 994-1016.
  • 21. Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, et al. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2281-2294.
  • 22. Chambers GM, Illingworth PJ, Sullivan EA. Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 594-598. <MJA full text>
  • 23. Farquhar CM, Wang YA, Sullivan EA. A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004–2007. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 2281-2289.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Iron deficiency and new insights into therapy

Michael SY Low and George Grigoriadis
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01304
Published online: 17 July 2017

Summary

 

  • Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia remain prevalent in Australia.
  • The groups at highest risk are pre-menopausal women, socially disadvantaged people and those of Indigenous background.
  • Diagnosing iron deficiency using a full blood examination and iron studies can be difficult and can be further complicated by concomitant inflammation. Results of iron studies should always be interpreted as an overall picture rather than focusing on individual parameters. In difficult clinical scenarios, soluble transferrin receptor assays can be useful.
  • Management of iron deficiency involves identification and treatment of the cause of iron deficiency, as well as effective iron replacement.
  • Clinicians should always take a detailed history and perform a comprehensive physical examination of a patient with iron deficiency. Patients should be monitored even if a likely cause of iron deficiency is identified.
  • Patients who fail to respond to iron replacement or maintain iron status should be referred for further investigation, including endoscopy to exclude internal bleeding.
  • Both enteral and parenteral iron are effective at replacing iron. For most adult patients, we recommend trialling daily oral iron (30–100 mg of elemental iron) as the first-line therapy.
  • Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron infusions have improved with the availability of a newer formulation, ferric carboxymaltose. Patients who fail to respond to oral iron replacement can be safely managed with intravenous iron.
  • Blood transfusion for iron deficiency anaemia should be reserved for life-threatening situations and should always be followed by appropriate iron replacement.

 


  • 1 Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC



Acknowledgements: 

Michael Low is employed by Monash Health and funded by a Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) CRB Blackburn Scholarship. George Grigoriadis is employed by Monash Health and Alfred Health and funded by a Victorian Cancer Agency Clinical Research Fellowship. We thank Shahla Vilcassim (Monash Haematology) for her help in attaining the figure in .

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e16-e25.
  • 2. Stoltzfus R. Defining iron-deficiency anemia in public health terms: a time for reflection. J Nutr 2001; 131 (2S-2): 565S-567S.
  • 3. Pasricha SR, Flecknoe-Brown SC, Allen KJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anaemia: a clinical update. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 525-532. <MJA full text>
  • 4. Hopkins RM, Gracey MS, Hobbs RP, et al. The prevalence of hookworm infection, iron deficiency and anaemia in an Aboriginal community in north-west Australia. Med J Aust 1997; 166: 241-244.
  • 5. Callander EJ, Schofield DJ. Is there a mismatch between who gets iron supplementation and who needs it? A cross-sectional study of iron supplements, iron deficiency anaemia and socio-economic status in Australia. Br J Nutr 2016; 115: 703-708.
  • 6. Salvin HE, Pasricha SR, Marks DC, Speedy J. Iron deficiency in blood donors: a national cross-sectional study. Transfusion 2014; 54: 2434-2444.
  • 7. Digestive Health Foundation, Gastroenterological Society of Australia. Iron deficiency: clinical update. Melbourne: GESA, 2015. http://www.gesa.org.au/resources/clinical-guidelines-and-updates/iron-deficiency (accessed May 2017).
  • 8. Beard JL. Why iron deficiency is important in infant development. J Nutr 2008; 138: 2534-2536.
  • 9. World Health Organization. Iron deficiency anaemia: assessment, prevention and control. A guide for programme managers. Geneva: WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/micronutrients/anaemia_iron_deficiency/WHO_NHD_01.3/en (accessed May 2017).
  • 10. Low MS, Speedy J, Styles CE, et al. Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (4): CD009747.
  • 11. Breymann C. Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Semin Hematol 2015; 52: 339-347.
  • 12. Lopez A, Cacoub P, Macdougall IC, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Iron deficiency anaemia. Lancet 2016; 387: 907-916.
  • 13. Worwood M. Annex 2. Indicators of the iron status of populations: ferritin. In: Assessing the iron status of populations. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007: 31-74.
  • 14. Garcia-Casal MN, Peña-Rosas JP, Pasricha SR. Rethinking ferritin cutoffs for iron deficiency and overload. Lancet Haematol 2014; 1: e92-e94.
  • 15. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Williet N, Cacoub P. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency across indications: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102: 1585-1594.
  • 16. Dugdale AE. Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anaemia: a clinical update. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 429. <MJA full text>
  • 17. Tan YL, Kidson-Gerber G. Antenatal haemoglobinopathy screening in Australia. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 226-230. <MJA full text>
  • 18. Infusino I, Braga F, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and sTfR/log ferritin index for the diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia. A meta-analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 2012; 138: 642-649.
  • 19. World Health Organization. Guideline: daily iron supplementation in adult women and adolescent girls. Geneva: WHO, 2016. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/micronutrients/guidelines/daily_iron_supp_womenandgirls/en (accessed May 2017).
  • 20. Pasricha SR, Drakesmith H. Iron deficiency anemia: problems in diagnosis and prevention at the population level. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2016; 30: 309-325.
  • 21. Sazawal S, Black RE, Ramsan M, et al. Effects of routine prophylactic supplementation with iron and folic acid on admission to hospital and mortality in preschool children in a high malaria transmission setting: community-based, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 133-143.
  • 22. Tielsch JM, Khatry SK, Stoltzfus RJ, et al. Effect of routine prophylactic supplementation with iron and folic acid on preschool child mortality in southern Nepal: community-based, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 144-152.
  • 23. Thompson J, Biggs BA, Pasricha SR. Effects of daily iron supplementation in 2- to 5-year-old children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 739-753.
  • 24. Pasricha SR, Hayes E, Kalumba K, Biggs BA. Effect of daily iron supplementation on health in children aged 4–23 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e77-e86.
  • 25. Low M, Farrell A, Biggs BA, Pasricha SR. Effects of daily iron supplementation in primary-school-aged children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 2013; 185: E791-E802.
  • 26. Pasricha SR, Low M, Thompson J, et al. Iron supplementation benefits physical performance in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr 2014; 144: 906-914.
  • 27. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Section 12.2. Assessing the quality of a body of evidence. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_12/12_2_assessing_the_quality_of_a_body_of_evidence.htm (accessed May 2017).
  • 28. Fernández-Gaxiola AC, De-Regil LM. Intermittent iron supplementation for reducing anaemia and its associated impairments in menstruating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12): CD009218.
  • 29. Moretti D, Goede JS, Zeder C, et al. Oral iron supplements increase hepcidin and decrease iron absorption from daily or twice-daily doses in iron-depleted young women. Blood 2015; 126: 1981-1989.
  • 30. Rognoni C, Venturini S, Meregaglia M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose and other formulations in iron-deficient patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Drug Investig 2016; 36: 177-194.
  • 31. Onken JE, Bregman DB, Harrington RA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Transfusion 2014; 54: 306-315.
  • 32. Schatz U, Arneth B, Siegert G, et al. Iron deficiency and its management in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis. Comparison of two parenteral iron formulations. Atheroscler Suppl 2013; 14: 115-122.
  • 33. Chunilal S, Paricha S, Bennett A, et al. Safety of RAPid INJECTion of undiluted ferric carboxymaltose to patients with iron deficiency anaemia (RAPINJECT) [abstract]. Annual Scientific Meeting of the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand, 13–16 November 2016. Melbourne.
  • 34. Bregman DB, Goodnough LT. Experience with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Ther Adv Hematol 2014; 5: 48-60.
  • 35. Onken JE, Bregman DB, Harrington RA, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron-deficiency anemia and impaired renal function: the REPAIR-IDA trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014; 29: 833-842.
  • 36. Porter JB. Practical management of iron overload. Br J Haematol 2001; 115: 239-252.
  • 37. Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Classification & incidence of adverse events. http://www.transfusion.com.au/adverse_transfusion_reactions/classification_and_incidence (accessed May 2017).
  • 38. Anonymous. Iron deficiency anaemia in a young woman: a plea for early investigation. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 562. <MJA full text>
  • 39. The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Iron preparations and therapy. Iron supplementation. http://www.rch.org.au/genmed/clinical_resources/Oral_Iron_Preparations (accessed May 2017).
  • 40. Laass MW, Straub S, Chainey S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ferric carboxymaltose treatment in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease and other gastrointestinal diseases. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 184.
  • 41. Chang TP, Rangan C. Iron poisoning: a literature-based review of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 978-985.
  • 42. Dewey KG. Impact of breastfeeding on maternal nutritional status. Adv Exp Med Biol 2004; 554: 91-100.
  • 43. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Routine antenatal assessment in the absence of pregnancy complications (C-OBS 03B). 2016. https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/Statements-Guidelines (accessed May 2017).
  • 44. Burke RM, Leon JS, Suchdev PS. Identification, prevention and treatment of iron deficiency during the first 1000 days. Nutrients 2014; 6: 4093-4114.
  • 45. Peña-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Garcia-Casal MN, Dowswell T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7): CD004736.
  • 46. Peña-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Gomez Malave H, et al. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10): CD009997.
  • 47. Breymann C, Milman N, Mezzacasa A, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose vs. oral iron in the treatment of pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia: an international, open-label, randomized controlled trial (FER-ASAP). J Perinat Med 2016; doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0050 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 48. Hallet J, Hanif A, Callum J, et al. The impact of perioperative iron on the use of red blood cell transfusions in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev 2014; 28: 205-211.
  • 49. Froessler B, Palm P, Weber I, et al. The important role for intravenous iron in perioperative patient blood management in major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 41-46.
  • 50. Khalafallah AA, Yan C, Al-Badri R, et al. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus standard care in the management of postoperative anaemia: a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3: e415-e425.
  • 51. Elhenawy AM, Meyer SR, Bagshaw SM, et al. Role of preoperative intravenous iron therapy to correct anemia before major surgery: study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 29.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

High rates of general practice attendance by former prisoners: a prospective cohort study

Megan Carroll, Matthew J Spittal, Anna R Kemp-Casey, Nicholas G Lennox, David B Preen, Georgina Sutherland and Stuart A Kinner
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00841
Published online: 17 July 2017

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the rates at which people recently released from prison attend general practitioners, and to describe service users and their encounters.

Design, participants and setting: Prospective cohort study of 1190 prisoners in Queensland, interviewed up to 6 weeks before expected release from custody (August 2008 – July 2010); their responses were linked prospectively with Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data for the 2 years after their release. General practice attendance was compared with that of members of the general Queensland population of the same sex and in the same age groups.

Main outcome measures: Rates of general practice attendance by former prisoners during the 2 years following their release from prison.

Results: In the 2 years following release from custody, former prisoners attended general practice services twice as frequently (standardised rate ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 2.00–2.07) as other Queenslanders; 87% of participants visited a GP at least once during this time. 42% of encounters resulted in a filled prescription, and 12% in diagnostic testing. Factors associated with higher rates of general practice attendance included history of risky opiate use (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.65–2.65), having ever been diagnosed with a mental disorder (IRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14–1.53), and receiving medication while in prison (IRR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.58–2.10).

Conclusions: Former prisoners visited general practice services with greater frequency than the general Queensland population. This is consistent with their complex health needs, and suggests that increasing access to primary care to improve the health of former prisoners may be insufficient, and should be accompanied by improving the quality, continuity, and cultural appropriateness of care.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Centre for Health Services Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
  • 3 Quality Use of Medicines Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA
  • 4 Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Brisbane, QLD
  • 5 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
  • 6 Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD
  • 7 Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD



Acknowledgements: 

We thank Queensland Corrective Services for assistance with data collection, and Passports study participants for sharing their stories. We acknowledge the Australian Government Department of Human Services as the source of Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) records. The Passports study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Strategic Award (409966). The HIP-Aus study is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Project grant (1002463). Stuart Kinner is supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (APP1078168). The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors, and in no way reflect the views or policies of Queensland Corrective Services.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Fazel S, Baillargeon J. The health of prisoners. Lancet 2011; 377: 956-965.
  • 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health of Australia’s prisoners 2012 (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 170). Canberra: AIHW, 2013.
  • 3. Butler T, Andrews G, Allnutt S, et al. Mental disorders in Australian prisoners: a comparison with a community sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006; 40: 272-276.
  • 4. Kinner SA, Wang EA. The case for improving the health of ex-prisoners. Am J Public Health 2014; 104: 1352-1355.
  • 5. Frank J, Linder J, Becker W, et al. Increased hospital and emergency department utilization by individuals with recent criminal justice involvement: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29: 1226-1233.
  • 6. Alan J, Burmas M, Preen D, Pfaff J. Inpatient hospital use in the first year after release from prison: a Western Australian population-based record linkage study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2011; 35: 264-269.
  • 7. Kinner SA, Young JT, Carroll M. The pivotal role of primary care in meeting the health needs of people recently released from prison. Australas Psychiatry 2015; 23: 650-653.
  • 8. Feron J, Paulus D, Tonglet R, et al. Substantial use of primary health care by prisoners: epidemiological description and possible explanations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59: 651-655.
  • 9. Marshall T, Simpson S, Stevens A. Use of health services by prison inmates: comparisons with the community. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 364-365.
  • 10. Wang EA, Hong CS, Shavit S, et al. Engaging individuals recently released from prison into primary care: a randomized trial. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: e22-e29.
  • 11. Young JT, Arnold-Reed D, Preen D, et al. Early primary care physician contact and health service utilisation in a large sample of recently released ex-prisoners in Australia: prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e008021.
  • 12. Kinner SA, Alati R, Longo M, et al. Low-intensity case management increases contact with primary care in recently released prisoners: a single-blinded, multisite, randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70: 683-688.
  • 13. Babor TF Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary care. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67205/1/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 14. WHO ASSIST Working Group. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction 2002; 97: 1183-1194.
  • 15. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 959-976.
  • 16. Hayes SC. Early intervention or early incarceration? Using a screening test for intellectual disability in the criminal justice system. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2002; 15: 120-128.
  • 17. Dias S, Ware RS, Kinner SA, Lennox NG. Physical health outcomes in prisoners with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2013; 57: 1191-1196.
  • 18. Mai Q, Holman CD, Sanfilippo FM, et al. Do users of mental health services lack access to general practitioner services? Med J Aust 2010; 192: 501-506. <MJA full text>
  • 19. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4517.0. Prisoners in Australia 2011. Dec 2011. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4517.0Main+Features12011?OpenDocument (accessed May 2017).
  • 20. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2013–14 (General Practice Series No. 36). Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2014. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/11882/4/9781743324226_ONLINE.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 21. The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual surveillance report 2013. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales, 2013. https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/kirby/report/SERP_2013-Annual-Surveillance-Report.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 22. Queensland Health. Queensland opioid treatment program: clinical guidelines 2012. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 2012. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/444613/qotp-clinical-guidelines.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 23. Håkansson A, Berglund M. Risk factors for criminal recidivism — a prospective follow-up study in prisoners with substance abuse. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12: 111.
  • 24. Winter RJ, Stoové M, Degenhardt L, et al. Incidence and predictors of non-fatal drug overdose after release from prison among people who inject drugs in Queensland, Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 153: 43-49.
  • 25. Hayman NE, White NE, Spurling GK. Improving Indigenous patients’ access to mainstream health services: the Inala experience. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 604-606. <MJA full text>
  • 26. Furler JS, Harris E, Chondros P, et al. The inverse care law revisited: impact of disadvantaged location on accessing longer GP consultation times. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 80-83. <MJA full text>
  • 27. Health Quality Ontario. Continuity of care to optimize chronic disease management in the community setting: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2013; 13: 1-41.
  • 28. Nutting PA, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, et al. Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when? Ann Fam Med 2003; 1: 149-155.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Changes in pathology test ordering by early career general practitioners: a longitudinal study

Parker J Magin, Amanda Tapley, Simon Morgan, Kim Henderson, Elizabeth G Holliday, Andrew R Davey, Jean Ball, Nigel F Catzikiris, Katie J Mulquiney and Mieke L van Driel
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01421
Published online: 17 July 2017

Abstract

Objective: To assess the number of pathology tests ordered by general practice registrars during their first 18–24 months of clinical general practice.

Design: Longitudinal analysis of ten rounds of data collection (2010–2014) for the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, an ongoing, multicentre, cohort study of general practice registrars in Australia. The principal analysis employed negative binomial regression in a generalised estimating equations framework (to account for repeated measures on registrars).

Setting, participants: General practice registrars in training posts with five of 17 general practice regional training providers in five Australian states. The registrar participation rate was 96.4%.

Main outcome measure: Number of pathology tests requested per consultation. The time unit for analysis was the registrar training term (the 6-month full-time equivalent component of clinical training); registrars contributed data for up to four training terms.

Results: 876 registrars contributed data for 114 584 consultations. The number of pathology tests requested increased by 11% (95% CI, 8–15%; P < 0.001) per training term.

Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, pathology test ordering by general practice registrars increased significantly during their first 2 years of clinical practice. This causes concerns about overtesting. As established general practitioners order fewer tests than registrars, test ordering may peak during late vocational training and early career practice. Registrars need support during this difficult period in the development of their clinical practice patterns.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 2 GP Synergy, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Elermore Vale General Practice, Newcastle, NSW
  • 4 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW
  • 5 University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD



Acknowledgements: 

This work was supported by an Education Research Grant from the Australian Department of Health (grant number, D14/17024). The ReCEnT project was funded until 2015 by the participating educational organisations: General Practice Training Valley to Coast, the Victorian Metropolitan Alliance, General Practice Training Tasmania, Adelaide to Outback GP Training Program, and Tropical Medical Training, all of which were funded by the Australian Government. From 2016, ReCEnT is funded by an Australian Department of Health commissioned research grant and supported by the GP Synergy Regional Training Organisation. We acknowledge the general practice registrars, general practice supervisors and practices who have participated in the ReCEnT project, and Neil Spike and Rohan Kerr for their contributions to the wider ReCEnT project.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Winkens R, Dinant G-J. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. BMJ 2002; 324: 783.
  • 2. Bayram C, Britt H, Miller G, Valenti L. Evidence–practice gap in GP pathology test ordering: a comparison of BEACH pathology data and recommended testing. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2009. https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/9C300FE48F876E95CA257BF0001ACE0E/$File/Evidence-practice%20gap%20in%20GP%20pathology%20test%20ordering.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 3. Alonso-Cerezo MC, Martin JS, Garcia Montes MA, de la Iglesia VM. Appropriate utilization of clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47: 1461-1465.
  • 4. Hammett RJH, Harris RD. Halting the growth in diagnostic testing. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 124-125. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, et al. The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78962.
  • 6. Mindemark M, Wernroth L, Larsson A. Costly regional variations in primary health care test utilization in Sweden. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2010; 70: 164-170.
  • 7. Barth JH, Jones RG. Indiscriminate investigations have adverse effects. BMJ 2003; 326: 393.
  • 8. Deyo RA. Cascade effects of medical technology. Annu Rev Public Health 2002; 23: 23-44.
  • 9. Naugler C, Thomas R, Turin TC, et al. Yearly clinical laboratory test expenditures for different medical specialties in a major Canadian city. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144: 97-102.
  • 10. van Walraven C, Goel V, Austin P. Why are investigations not recommended by practice guidelines ordered at the periodic health examination? J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 215-224.
  • 11. Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S, Wilt TJ. Screening for prostate cancer: an updated Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2011; 107: 882-891.
  • 12. Leurquin P, Van Casteren V, De Maeseneer J. Use of blood tests in general practice: a collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45: 21-25.
  • 13. Verstappen WHJM, ter Riet G, Dubois WI, et al. Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? Fam Pract 2004; 21: 387-395.
  • 14. Smellie WS, Galloway MJ, Chinn D. Benchmarking general practice use of pathology services: a model for monitoring change. J Clin Pathol 2000; 53: 476-480.
  • 15. Smellie WSA, Galloway MJ, Chinn D, Gedling P. Is clinical practice variability the major reason for differences in pathology requesting patterns in general practice? J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 312-314.
  • 16. Bubner T, Laurence C, Tirimacco R. Assessing pathology training needs — results from a survey of general practice registrars. Aust Fam Physician 2012; 41: 721-724.
  • 17. Morgan S, Henderson KM, Tapley A, et al. Pathology test-ordering behaviour of Australian general practice trainees: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Qual Health Care 2015; 27: 528-535.
  • 18. Morgan S, Magin PJ, Henderson KM, et al. Study protocol: the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 50.
  • 19. Trewin D. Statistical geography volume 1: Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). July 2006 (ABS Cat. No. 1216.0). Canberra: ABS, 2006. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/3E15ACB95DA01A65CA2571AA0018369F/$File/12160_2006.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 20. Pink B. An introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). 2006 (ABS Cat. No. 2039.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/D729075E079F9FDECA2574170011B088/$File/20390_2006.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 21. Classification Committee of the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA). ICPC-2. International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • 22. O’Halloran J, Miller GC, Britt H. Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 381-386.
  • 23. Britt H, Miller G, Henderson J, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2013–14 (General Practice Series No. 36). Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2014. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/11882/4/9781743324226_ONLINE.pdf (accessed May 2017).
  • 24. Magin P, Morgan S, Wearne S, et al. GP trainees’ in-consultation information-seeking: associations with human, paper and electronic sources. Fam Pract 2015; 32: 525-532.
  • 25. Bonney A, Morgan S, Tapley A, et al. Older patients’ consultations in an apprenticeship model-based general practice training program: a cross-sectional study. Australas J Ageing 2017; 36: E1-E7.
  • 26. Pearlman J, Morgan S, van Driel M, et al. Continuity of care in general practice vocational training: prevalence, associations and implications for training. Educ Primary Care 2016; 27: 27-36.
  • 27. Bonevski B, Magin P, Horton G, et al. Response rates in GP surveys: trialling two recruitment strategies. Aust Fam Physician 2011; 40: 427-430.
  • 28. Solomon DH, Hashimoto H, Daltroy L, Liang MH. Techniques to improve physicians’ use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. JAMA 1998; 280: 2020-2027.
  • 29. van Walraven C, Goel V, Chan B. Effect of population-based interventions on laboratory utilization: a time-series analysis. JAMA 1998; 280: 2028-2033.
  • 30. Verstappen WHJM, van Merode F, Grimshaw J, et al. Comparing cost effects of two quality strategies to improve test ordering in primary care: a randomized trial. Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16: 391-398.
  • 31. van Bokhoven MA, Pleunis-van Empel MCH, Koch H, et al. Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2006; 7: 75.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Can antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections be reduced?

Martin Gulliford and Mark Ashworth
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00382
Published online: 17 July 2017

It must be — as an essential component of the response to the antimicrobial drug resistance problem

The growing threat of antimicrobial drug resistance (AMR) is attracting the attention of national governments and international organisations. In the words of Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization, “We are hearing one alarm bell after another.”1 This is apparent in primary care, where the frequency of antibiotic-resistant infections is increasing. The emergence of AMR is a multifaceted societal problem that requires action from a range of actors, including the pharmaceutical, agricultural and food production industries.2 But it is the health care sector, where antibiotics are prescribed and patients with resistant infections are seen, that the impact of AMR is most acute. This is especially relevant in Australia, where antibiotic consumption is among the highest of the OECD countries.3


  • King's College London, London, United Kingdom


Correspondence: martin.gulliford@kcl.ac.uk

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Chan M. WHO Director-General addresses ministerial conference on antimicrobial resistance. European Union Ministerial Conference on Antimicrobial Resistance, Amsterdam: Netherlands, 10 Feb 2016. http://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2016/antimicrobial-resistance-conference/en/ (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 2. O’Neill J (chair). Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. May 2016. London: Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, 2016. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a glance 2015. How does Australia compare? https://www.oecd.org/australia/Health-at-a-Glance-2015-Key-Findings-AUSTRALIA.pdf (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 4. Public Health England. English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR). Report 2016. London: PHE: 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/575626/ESPAUR_Report_2016.pdf (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 5. McCullough AR, Pollack AJ, Plejdrup Hansen M, et al. Antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in general practice: comparison of prescribing rates with guideline recommendations. Med J Aust 2017; 207: 65-69.
  • 6. Gulliford MC, Dregan A, Moore MV, et al. Continued high rates of antibiotic prescribing to adults with respiratory tract infection: survey of 568 UK general practices. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e006245.
  • 7. Gulliford M, Latinovic R, Charlton J, et al. Selective decrease in consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in UK primary care up to 2006. J Public Health 2009; 31: 512-520.
  • 8. Ashworth M, Latinovic R, Charlton J, et al. Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database. J Public Health 2004; 26: 268-274.
  • 9. Venekamp RP, Sanders S, Glasziou PP, et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (1): CD000219.
  • 10. Spinks A, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB. Antibiotics for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11): CD000023.
  • 11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care (Clinical guideline CG69). July 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg69/chapter/1-Guidance (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 12. Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, et al. Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics. BMJ 1997; 315: 350-352.
  • 13. Petersen I, Johnson AM, Islam A, et al. Protective effect of antibiotics against serious complications of common respiratory tract infections: retrospective cohort study with the UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007; 335: 982.
  • 14. Gulliford MC, Moore MV, Little P, et al. Safety of reduced antibiotic prescribing for self limiting respiratory tract infections in primary care: cohort study using electronic health records. BMJ 2016; 354: i3410.
  • 15. Spurling GK, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, et al. Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (4): CD004417.
  • 16. Aabenhus R, Jensen JU, Jørgensen KJ, et al. Biomarkers as point-of-care tests to guide prescription of antibiotics in patients with acute respiratory infections in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (11): CD010130.
  • 17. Hallsworth M, Chadborn T, Sallis A, et al. Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1743-1752.
  • 18. NHS England. Quality premium: guidance for 2016/17. Mar 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/qualty-prem-guid-2016-17.pdf (accessed Apr 2017).
  • 19. NHS England. Success in NHS push to reduce avoidable antibiotic prescribing [media release]. 23 Mar 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2016/03/antibiotic-prescribing/ (accessed Apr 2017).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Pagination

Subscribe to