MJA
MJA

COPD-X Australian and New Zealand guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2017 update

Ian A Yang, Juliet L Brown, Johnson George, Sue Jenkins, Christine F McDonald, Vanessa M McDonald, Kirsten Phillips, Brian J Smith, Nicholas A Zwar and Eli Dabscheck
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00686
Published online: 20 November 2017

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by persistent respiratory symptoms and chronic airflow limitation, and is associated with exacerbations and comorbidities. Advances in the management of COPD are updated quarterly in the national COPD guidelines, the COPD-X plan, published by Lung Foundation Australia in conjunction with the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and available at http://copdx.org.au.

Main recommendations:

  • Spirometry detects persistent airflow limitation (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7) and must be used to confirm the diagnosis.
  • Non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies should be considered as they optimise function (ie, improve symptoms and quality of life) and prevent deterioration (ie, prevent exacerbations and reduce decline).
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation and regular exercise are highly beneficial and should be provided to all symptomatic COPD patients.
  • Short- and long-acting inhaled bronchodilators and, in more severe disease, anti-inflammatory agents (inhaled corticosteroids) should be considered in a stepwise approach.
  • Given the wide range of inhaler devices available, inhaler technique and adherence should be checked regularly.
  • Smoking cessation is essential, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations reduce the risk of exacerbations.
  • A plan of care should be developed with the multidisciplinary team. COPD action plans reduce hospitalisations and are recommended as part of COPD self-management.
  • Exacerbations should be managed promptly with bronchodilators, corticosteroids and antibiotics as appropriate to prevent hospital admission and delay COPD progression.
  • Comorbidities of COPD require identification and appropriate management.
  • Supportive, palliative and end-of-life care are beneficial for patients with advanced disease.
  • Education of patients, carers and clinicians, and a strong partnership between primary and tertiary care, facilitate evidence-based management of COPD.

 

Changes in management as result of the guideline: Spirometry remains the gold standard for diagnosing airflow obstruction and COPD. Non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment should be used in a stepwise fashion to control symptoms and reduce exacerbation risk.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Spirometry: key to the diagnosis of respiratory disorders

John R Wheatley
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00684
Published online: 20 November 2017

Spirometry remains the cornerstone of respiratory function testing and is the key to diagnosing and monitoring the most common respiratory disorders. Spirometry measures how quickly the air can empty from the lungs (flow) and how much air can be moved during a maximal expiration (volume). It is a valuable clinical tool to detect diseases that impair respiratory function, help exclude respiratory disease as a cause of current symptoms, assess the severity of any impairment in function, and monitor the effects of any therapeutic intervention or of disease progression.


  • Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: john.wheatley@sydney.edu.au

 

Series editors

Balakrishnan (Kichu) Nair

Simon O’Connor


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319-338.
  • 2. Levy ML, Quanjer PH, Booker R, et al. Diagnostic spirometry in primary care: proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations. Prim Care Respir J 2009; 18: 130-147.
  • 3. Borg BM, Thompson BR, O’Hehir RE. Interpreting lung function tests: a step-by-step guide. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014; pp 13-36.
  • 4. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968.
  • 5. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95 year age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324-1343.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Legal does not mean unaccountable: suing tobacco companies to recover health care costs

Ross MacKenzie, Eric LeGresley and Mike Daube
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00310
Published online: 20 November 2017

It is time for legal action to recover health care costs from the tobacco industry

Australia’s 2011 precedent-setting plain packaging legislation1 reinforced the country’s reputation within the tobacco industry as “the darkest market in the world”.2 The country’s commitment to tobacco control, and a declining national smoking rate that is among the lowest in the world should not, however, mislead the public or policy makers into a mistaken belief that tobacco is done.


  • 1 Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • 3 Curtin University, Perth, WA


Correspondence: ross.mackenzie@mq.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

Ross MacKenzie is supported by the National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, grant no. R01-CA091021.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Challenging how tobacco is sold in Australia

Becky Freeman
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00544
Published online: 20 November 2017

Despite being addictive and deadly, tobacco is widely accessible in all communities

Given that two-thirds of regular smokers in Australia will die from smoking-related causes,1 tobacco is remarkably available and easy to purchase. Tobacco is sold in every community, on every high street and in every retail precinct. Australian consumers can freely purchase cigarettes in the same places where they buy healthy household staples such as fruit and vegetables, milk and bread. With an estimated 40 000 outlets selling tobacco across Australia,2 it is one of the most widely accessible consumer goods on the market — yet the most dangerous when used as intended. While Australia has delivered crippling hits to the tobacco industry’s ability to promote its products, we have yet to land even a glancing blow to how and where it sells its products.


  • University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: becky.freeman@sydney.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

On 31 May 2017, I attended the Tobacco Retail Summit hosted by the Cancer Council New South Wales. Australian and international speakers and participants discussed reforming the tobacco retail sector and I am indebted to their collective wisdom in helping inform this commentary.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Determining the contribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae to community-acquired pneumonia in Australia

J Kevin Yin, Sanjay H Jayasinghe, Patrick G Charles, Catherine King, Clayton K Chiu, Robert I Menzies and Peter B McIntyre
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01102
Published online: 6 November 2017

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate trends in the proportion and severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) attributable to Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) in Australians aged 18 years and over.

Study design: Systematic review with unpublished data from the largest study.

Data sources: Multiple key bibliographic databases to June 2016.

Study selection: Australian studies on the aetiology of CAP in adults.

Data synthesis: In the 12 studies identified, pneumococcus was the most common cause of CAP. Four studies were assessed as being of good quality. Participants in two studies were predominantly non-Indigenous (n = 991); the proportion of pneumococcal CAP cases declined from 26.4% in 1987–88 to 13.9% in 2004–06, and the proportion with bacteraemia decreased from 7.8% to 3.8%. In two studies with predominantly Indigenous participants (n = 252), the proportion with pneumococcal bacteraemia declined from 6.8% in 1999–2000 to 4.2% in 2006–07. In the largest study (n = 885; 2004–06), 50.8% (60/118) of pneumococcal CAP occurred in people who were ≥ 65 years old. Among patients aged ≥ 65 years, intensive care unit admission and death were more common in patients who were ≥ 85 years old compared with younger patients (12.5% v 6.8%; 18.8% v 6.8% respectively), and also more common in the 19 patients with bacteraemia than in those without it (15.8% v 2.6%; 10.5% v 7.9% respectively). Of 17 cases of bacteraemia serotyped, 12 were due to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPCV) serotypes and three to additional serotypes in 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPPV).

Conclusions: Available data suggest that the proportion of CAP attributable to pneumococcus (both bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic) has been declining in Australian adults. Should 13vPCV replace the 23vPPV currently funded by the National Immunisation Program for persons aged ≥ 65 years, surveillance to track non-bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP will be essential to evaluate the impact.


  • 1 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: jk.yin@hotmail.com

Acknowledgements: 

The Australian Government Department of Health supported the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS) of vaccine preventable diseases in Australia. However, the views expressed are not necessarily those of the department. The study was undertaken as part of the regular policy deliberations of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation. We thank the members of the Australian Community-acquired Pneumonia Study Collaboration.

Competing interests:

Since the completion of this study and the submission of the manuscript for publication, J Kevin Yin left his employment at the NCIRS to work for Sanofi Pasteur Australia and New Zealand.

  • 1. Janssens JP, Krause KH. Pneumonia in the very old. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4: 112-124.
  • 2. Fuller A, Pickles R, Spelman D, et al. Community acquired pneumonia at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne: a prospective study with particular reference to Chlamydia pneumoniae [abstract]. Proceedings for the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases; Darwin (Australia), 21-24 May 1995.
  • 3. Lim WS, Macfarlane JT, Boswell TC, et al. Study of community acquired pneumonia aetiology (SCAPA) in adults admitted to hospital: implications for management guidelines. Thorax 2001; 56: 296-301.
  • 4. van der Eerden MM, Vlaspolder F, de Graaff CS, et al. Value of intensive diagnostic microbiological investigation in low- and high-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 24: 241-249.
  • 5. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: S27-S72.
  • 6. Said MA, Johnson HL, Nonyane BAS, et al. Estimating the burden of pneumococcal pneumonia among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic techniques. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60273.
  • 7. Musher DM, Thorner AR. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1619-1628.
  • 8. Bonten MJM, Huijts SM, Bolkenbaas M, et al. Polysaccharide conjugate vaccine against pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1114-1125.
  • 9. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Recommendations made by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in March 2015: 1st time decisions not to recommend. Canberra: PBAC; 2015. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/2015-03 (accessed July 2015).
  • 10. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Recommendations made by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in July 2015: positive recommendations. Canberra: PBAC; 2015. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/pbac-outcomes-2015-07 (accessed Aug 2015).
  • 11. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Recommendations made by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in July 2016 meetings: positive recommendations. Canberra: PBAC; 2016. https://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/2016-07/positive-recommendations-2016-07.pdf (accessed Sept 2016).
  • 12. Smith MD, Sheppard CL, Hogan A, et al. Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in adults with bacteremia and community-acquired pneumonia: clinical comparison of pneumococcal PCR and urinary antigen detection. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 1046-1049.
  • 13. Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Ontario: EPHPP; 2009. http://www.ephpp.ca/tools.html (accessed Nov 2016).
  • 14. Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, et al. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18: 12-18.
  • 15. Charles PG, Whitby M, Fuller AJ, et al. The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1513-1521.
  • 16. Elliott JH, Anstey NM, Jacups SP, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in northern Australia: low mortality in a tropical region using locally-developed treatment guidelines. Int J Infect Dis 2005; 9: 15-20.
  • 17. Jacups SP, Cheng A. The epidemiology of community acquired bacteremic pneumonia, due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, in the Top End of the Northern Territory, Australia — over 22 years. Vaccine 2011; 29: 5386-5392.
  • 18. Jeremiah CJ, Hannan LM, Baird R, et al. Low utilisation of diagnostic microbiology for community acquired pneumonia in regional Victoria. Pathology 2013; 45: 162-166.
  • 19. Lim I, Shaw DR, Stanley DP, et al. A prospective hospital study of the aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia. Med J Aust 1989; 151: 87-91.
  • 20. Rémond MG, Ralph AP, Brady SJ, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in the central desert and north-western tropics of Australia. Intern Med J 2010; 40: 37-44.
  • 21. Skull SA, Andrews RM, Byrnes GB, et al. Hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: an Australian case-cohort study. Epidemiol Infect 2009; 137: 194-202.
  • 22. Thompson JE. Community acquired pneumonia in north eastern Australia–a hospital based study of aboriginal and non-aboriginal patients. Aust N Z J Med 1997; 27: 59-61.
  • 23. Tramontana AR, Sinickas V. Microbiological diagnostic tests for community-acquired pneumonia are useful. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 235-236. <MJA full text>
  • 24. Weatherall C, Paoloni R, Gottlieb T. Point-of-care urinary pneumococcal antigen test in the emergency department for community acquired pneumonia. Emerg Med J 2008; 25: 144-148.
  • 25. Wilson PA, Ferguson J. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an Australian perspective. Intern Med J 2005; 35: 699-705.
  • 26. Waight PA, Andrews NJ, Ladhani SN, et al. Effect of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease in England and Wales 4 years after its introduction: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 629.
  • 27. Moore MR, Link-Gelles R, Schaffner W, et al. Effect of use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children on invasive pneumococcal disease in children and adults in the USA: analysis of multisite, population-based surveillance. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 301-309.
  • 28. Rodrigo C, Bewick T, Sheppard C, et al. Impact of infant 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on serotypes in adult pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1632-1641.
  • 29. Torres A, Blasi F, Peetermans WE, et al. The aetiology and antibiotic management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults in Europe: a literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 1065-1079.
  • 30. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among US adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 415-427.
  • 31. Welte T, Torres A, Nathwani D. Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe. Thorax 2012; 67: 71-79.
  • 32. Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: key indicators 2014. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2015. http://www.pc.gov.au/research/recurring/overcoming-indigenous-disadvantage/key-indicators-2014#thereport (accessed June 2015).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Rates of hospitalisation for herpes zoster may warrant vaccinating Indigenous Australians under 70

Meru Sheel, Frank H Beard, Aditi Dey, Kristine Macartney and Peter B McIntyre
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01468
Published online: 6 November 2017

Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus infection. The most common complication of HZ is post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), which is often debilitating and refractory to treatment.1 The incidence of both HZ and PHN increases markedly with age.2 In November 2016, a vaccine for HZ was included in Australia’s National Immunisation Program (NIP) for all people aged 70, together with a 5-year catch-up program for those aged 71–79 years.3 The vaccine is cost-effective for people aged 70–79, but is registered for vaccinating people from age 50.3

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT
  • 3 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW



Acknowledgements: 

This work was supported by the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance. Meru Sheel is a scholar in the Master of Philosophy in Applied Epidemiology program at the Australian National University.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Epidemiology of invasive meningococcal B disease in Australia, 1999–2015: priority populations for vaccination

Brett N Archer, Clayton K Chiu, Sanjay H Jayasinghe, Peter C Richmond, Jodie McVernon, Monica M Lahra, Ross M Andrews and Peter B McIntyre, on behalf of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) Meningococcal Working Party
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01340
Published online: 6 November 2017

Abstract

Objectives: To describe trends in the age-specific incidence of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Australia, 1999–2015.

Design, setting, participants: Analysis in February 2017 of de-identified notification data from the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System of all notifications of IMD in Australia with a recorded diagnosis date during 1999–2015.

Major outcomes: IMD notification rates in Australia, 1999–2015, by age, serogroup, Indigenous status, and region.

Results: The incidence of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease declined progressively from 1.52 cases per 100 000 population in 2001 to 0.47 per 100 000 in 2015. During 2006–2015, MenB accounted for 81% of IMD cases with a known serogroup; its highest incidence was among infants under 12 months of age (11.1 [95% CI, 9.81–12.2] per 100 000), children aged 1–4 years (2.82 [95% CI, 2.52–3.15] per 100 000), and adolescents aged 15–19 years (2.40 [95% CI, 2.16–2.67] per 100 000). Among the 473 infants under 2 years of age with MenB, 43% were under 7 months and 69% under 12 months of age. The incidence of meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) disease prior to the introduction of the MenC vaccine in 2003 was much lower in infants than for MenB (2.60 cases per 100 000), the rate peaking in people aged 15–19 years (3.32 per 100 000); the overall case fatality rate was also higher (MenC, 8%; MenB, 4%). The incidence of MenB disease was significantly higher among Indigenous than non-Indigenous Australians during 2006–2015 (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 3.8; 95% CI, 3.3–4.5).

Conclusions: Based on disease incidence at its current low endemic levels, priority at risk age/population groups for MenB vaccination include all children between 2 months and 5 years of age, Indigenous children under 10 years of age, and all adolescents aged 15–19 years. Given marked variation in meningococcal disease trends over time, close scrutiny of current epidemiologic data is essential.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA
  • 4 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
  • 5 Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, WA
  • 6 Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC
  • 7 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 8 Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC
  • 9 Neisseria Reference Laboratory and WHO Collaborating Centre for Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 10 South Eastern Area Laboratory Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 11 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 12 Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT



Acknowledgements: 

The members of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) Meningococcal Working Party (2013) and of ATAGI (2013–2014) were Ross Andrews (chair), Michael Nissen, Peter McIntyre, Peter Richmond, Jodie McVernon, Sue Campbell-Lloyd, Karen Peterson, Monica Lahra, Ann Koehler and Julie Leask. We acknowledge the Office of Health Protection (Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing) and the National Neisseria Network, Australia for providing the data; and all jurisdictional representatives on the National Surveillance Committee (NSC) and the Communicable Diseases Network of Australia (CDNA) for advice on interpreting jurisdiction-specific features of the notified data.

Competing interests:

The views expressed in this article are those of its authors, and do not represent the official position of or recommendations by ATAGI or the Australian Government.

  • 1. Halperin SA, Bettinger JA, Greenwood B, et al. The changing and dynamic epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine 2012; 30 Suppl 2: B26-B36.
  • 2. Jafri RZ, Ali A, Messonnier NE, et al. Global epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease. Popul Health Metr 2013; 11: 17.
  • 3. Lahra MM, Enriquez RP. Australian meningococcal surveillance programme annual report, 2015. Commun Dis Intell 2016; 40: E503-E511.
  • 4. Sadarangani M, Scheifele DW, Halperin SA, et al. Outcomes of invasive meningococcal disease in adults and children in Canada between 2002 and 2011: a prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60: e27-e35.
  • 5. Viner RM, Booy R, Johnson H, et al. Outcomes of invasive meningococcal serogroup B disease in children and adolescents (MOSAIC): a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 11: 774-783.
  • 6. Wang B, Afzali HHA, Marshall H. The inpatient costs and hospital service use associated with invasive meningococcal disease in South Australian children. Vaccine 2014; 32: 4791-4798.
  • 7. Chiu C, Dey A, Wang H, et al. Vaccine preventable diseases in Australia, 2005 to 2007. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2010; 34 Suppl: S1-S167.
  • 8. Lawrence G, Wang H, Lahra M, et al. Meningococcal disease epidemiology in Australia 10 years after implementation of a national conjugate meningococcal C immunization programme. Epidemiol Infect 2016; 144: 2382-2391.
  • 9. Australian Government, Department of Health. Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) statement. Advice for immunisation providers regarding the use of Bexsero (March 2014). http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.nsf/Content/atagi-advice-bexsero (accessed May 2015).
  • 10. Australian Government, Department of Health. Multicomponent meningococcal group B vaccine, 0.5 mL, injection, prefilled syringe, Bexsero® — November 2013 [public summary document]. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; updated Mar 2016. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd/2013-11/meningococcal-vaccine (accessed June 2016).
  • 11. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Recommendations made by the PBAC July 2015: subsequent decisions not to recommend. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; updated Dec 2015. http://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/2015-07/web-outcomes-july-2015-subsequent-decision-not-to-recommend.pdf (accessed June 2016).
  • 12. Marshall H, Clarke M, Sullivan T. Parental and community acceptance of the benefits and risks associated with meningococcal B vaccines. Vaccine 2014; 32: 338-344.
  • 13. Australian Government, Department of Health. Meningococcal disease (invasive) surveillance case definition — V1.4. Updated Jan 2010. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cda-surveil-nndss-casedefs-cd_mening.htm (accessed Jan 2014).
  • 14. Gibson A, Jorm L, McIntyre P. Using linked birth, notification, hospital and mortality data to examine false-positive meningococcal disease reporting and adjust disease incidence estimates for children in New South Wales, Australia. Epidemiol Infect 2015; 143: 2570-2579.
  • 15. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3101.0. Australian demographic statistics, Jun 2016. Updated 15 Dec 2016. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0 (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 16. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3238.0. Estimates and projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2001 to 2026. Updated Apr 2014. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3238.0 (accessed May 2015).
  • 17. Naidu L, Chiu C, Habig A, et al. Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australia 2006–2010. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2013; 37 (Suppl): S1-S95.
  • 18. Borrow R, Abad R, Trotter C, et al. Effectiveness of meningococcal serogroup C vaccine programmes. Vaccine 2013; 31: 4477-4486.
  • 19. Andrews SM, Pollard AJ. A vaccine against serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis: dealing with uncertainty. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14: 426-434.
  • 20. Vesikari T, Esposito S, Prymula R, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational multicomponent, recombinant, meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) administered concomitantly with routine infant and child vaccinations: results of two randomised trials. Lancet 2013; 381: 825-835.
  • 21. Cohn AC, MacNeil JR, Clark TA, et al. Prevention and control of meningococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62 (RR-2): 1-28.
  • 22. MacNeil JR, Bennett N, Farley MM, et al. Epidemiology of infant meningococcal disease in the United States, 2006–2012. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e305-e311.
  • 23. Public Health England. Invasive meningococcal disease (laboratory reports in England): 2015/2016 annual data by epidemiological year. Health Protection Report: Weekly Report [online] 2016; 10(37). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/563949/hpr3716_imd-ann.pdf (accessed July 2017).
  • 24. Pollard AJ, Riordan A, Ramsay M. Group B meningococcal vaccine: recommendations for UK use. Lancet 2014; 383: 1103-1104.
  • 25. Parikh SR, Andrews NJ, Beebeejaun K, et al. Effectiveness and impact of a reduced infant schedule of 4CMenB vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in England: a national observational cohort study. Lancet 2016; 388: 2775-2782.
  • 26. Martin NV, Ong KS, Howden BP, et al. Rise in invasive serogroup W meningococcal disease in Australia 2013–2015. Commun Dis Intell 2016; 40: E454-E459.
  • 27. Government of South Australia, University of Adelaide. B part of it [website]. Updated 28 Nov 2016. http://www.bpartofit.com.au (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 28. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics. Bexsero® suspension for injection [product information]. 2013; updated July 2017. https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2013-PI-02131-1 (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 29. Poolman JT, Richmond P. Multivalent meningococcal serogroup B vaccines: challenges in predicting protection and measuring effectiveness. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14: 1277-1287.
  • 30. Patel MS. Australia’s century of meningococcal disease: development and the changing ecology of an accidental pathogen. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 136-141. <MJA full text>
  • 31. Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971; 297: 405-412.
  • 32. National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance. Meningococcal disease. Meningococcal vaccines for Australians: information for immunisation providers [fact sheet]. Mar 2017. http://www.ncirs.edu.au/assets/provider_resources/fact-sheets/meningococcal-vaccines-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed Aug 2017).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

The right to know versus the right to privacy: donor anonymity and the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic)

Xavier Symons
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00259
Published online: 6 November 2017

Recent Victorian legislation is ethically defensible but will need to be closely monitored

On 1 March 2017, the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic) came into effect, allowing for the retrospective release of anonymous donor information to donor-conceived children.1 The legislation, an Australian first, allows donor children to know the name, date of birth, ethnicity, physical characteristics, genetic conditions and donor code of their donor parents, even where anonymity has been requested. Donor children can access information about their biological parents through a new “one-door-in” service to be provided by the Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA), which is now managing the state’s central donor registry and providing information and support to donor-conceived people, parents, donors and their relatives. The donors affected by the legislation are those who donated before 1 January 1998; anonymous donation ceased in Victoria after that date.


  • Institute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: xavier.symons@nd.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Parliament of Victoria. Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (No. 6 of 2016). http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/51dea49770555ea6ca256da4001b90cd/A1554C040E11C661CA257F69000A4A50/$FILE/16-006aa%20authorised.pdf (accessed Sept 2017).
  • 2. Victoria’s changes to laws on tracing sperm and egg donors a sensible evolution [editorial]. The Age (Melbourne) 2017; 2 Mar. http://www.theage.com.au/comment/the-ageeditorial/victoriaschanges-to-laws-on-tracing-sperm-and-egg-donors-a-sensible-evolution-20170302-guowdh.html (accessed Sept 2017).
  • 3. Pennings G. How to kill gamete donation: retrospective legislation and donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2881-2885.
  • 4. Fyfe M. When sperm-donor children come calling. Sydney Morning Herald 2015; 3 Sept. http://www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/when-spermdonor-children-come-calling-20150902-gjd76r.html (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 5. Kirkham M, Bourne K, Fisher J, et al. Gamete donors’ expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 731-736.
  • 6. Bruce N. On the importance of genetic knowledge. Child Soc 1990; 4: 183-196.
  • 7. Marko Harrigan M, Dieter S, Leinwohl J, Marrin L. “It’s just who I am … I have brown hair. I have a mysterious father”: an exploration of donor-conceived offspring’s identity construction. J Fam Commun 2015; 15: 75-93.
  • 8. Golombok S, Blake L, Casey P, et al. Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54: 653-660.
  • 9. Mahlstedt P, LaBounty K, Kennedy W. The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2236-2246.
  • 10. Hammarberg K, Johnson L, Bourne K, et al. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response. Hum Reprod 2014 Feb; 29: 286-292.
  • 11. Paul M, Berger R. Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2566-2571.
  • 12. Scheib JE, Riordan M, Rubin S. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 239-252.
  • 13. Benetar D. The unbearable lightness of bringing into being. J Appl Philos 1999; 16: 173-180.
  • 14. Australian Law Reform Commission. Traditional rights and freedoms – encroachments by Commonwealth laws. Final report. (ALRC Report No. 29). Sydney: ALRC, 2016. https://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/alrc_129_final_report_.pdf (accessed Sept 2017).
  • 15. Nordquist P. The drive for openness in donor conception: conception: disclosure and the trouble with real life. Int J Law Policy Family 2014; 28: 321-338.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Sinusitis complicated by frontal bone osteomyelitis in a young patient

Roza Nastovska and Lyn-Li Lim
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01434
Published online: 6 November 2017

A 15-year-old male presented with acute left forehead swelling (Figure, A, arrow) and tenderness following a one-month history of worsening headache secondary to extensive frontal sinusitis. Imaging showed a scalp abscess, frontal bone osteomyelitis and underlying resolving sinusitis (Figure, B, arrow). Management included abscess drainage and bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery. Streptococcus anginosus was isolated and he completed a 6-week course of intravenous benzylpenicillin.


  • Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: roza.nastovska@gmail.com

Acknowledgements: 

We thank Jillian Lau for her contribution to the clinical case, editing of early drafts and contribution of clinical photography.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Elsevier: 2014.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

The increasing importance of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

Jason W Agostino, John K Ferguson, Keith Eastwood and Martyn D Kirk
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00089
Published online: 30 October 2017

Abstract

Objectives: To identify groups at risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, patterns of antimicrobial resistance, and the proportion of patients with MRSA infections but no history of recent hospitalisation.

Design, setting and participants: Case series of 39 231 patients with S. aureus isolates from specimens processed by the Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) public pathology provider during 2008–2014.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of MRSA infections among people with S. aureus isolates; antimicrobial susceptibility of MRSA isolates; origin of MRSA infections (community- or health care-associated); demographic factors associated with community-associated MRSA infections.

Results: There were 71 736 S. aureus-positive specimens during the study period and MRSA was isolated from 19.3% of first positive specimens. Most patients (56.9%) from whom MRSA was isolated had not been admitted to a public hospital in the past year. Multiple regression identified that patients with community-associated MRSA were more likely to be younger (under 40), Indigenous Australians (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% CI, 2.3–2.8), or a resident of an aged care facility (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.8–5.8). The proportion of MRSA isolates that included the dominant multi-resistant strain (AUS-2/3-like) declined from 29.6% to 3.4% during the study period (P < 0.001), as did the rates of hospital origin MRSA in two of the major hospitals in the region.

Conclusions: The prevalence of MRSA in the HNELHD region decreased during the study period, and was predominantly acquired in the community, particularly by young people, Indigenous Australians, and residents of aged care facilities. While the dominance of the multi-resistant strain decreased, new strategies for controlling infections in the community are needed to reduce the prevalence of non-multi-resistant strains.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Australian National University Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT
  • 2 John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
  • 3 University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 4 NSW Health Pathology, Newcastle, NSW
  • 5 Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW
  • 6 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT


Correspondence: jason.agostino@anu.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Brennan L, Lilliebridge RA, Cheng AC, et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in hospitalized patients in tropical northern Australia. J Hosp Infect 2013; 83: 205-211.
  • 2. Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Schooneveldt JM, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, including community-associated methicillin-resistant strains, in Queensland adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009; 15: 149-155.
  • 3. Coombs G, Daley D. Australian Staphylococcal Sepsis Outcome Program (ASSOP) 2015: final report. Perth: Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, 2016. http://www.agargroup.org/files/July.2016.ASSOP%202015%20Final%20Report%202016%20(1).pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 4. Coombs GW, Daley DA, Thin Lee Y, et al. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Australian Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Outcome Programme annual report, 2014. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2016; 40: E244-E254.
  • 5. Nimmo GR, Bergh H, Nakos J, et al. Replacement of healthcare-associated MRSA by community-associated MRSA in Queensland: confirmation by genotyping. J Infect 2013; 67: 439-447.
  • 6. Tong SY, Varrone L, Chatfield MD, et al. Progressive increase in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Indigenous populations in northern Australia from 1993 to 2012. Epidemiol Infect 2015; 143: 1519-1523.
  • 7. Daley D, Coombs G, Nimmo G, et al. Staphylococcus aureus programme 2012. Community survey: antimicrobial susceptibility report. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR), 2013. http://www.agargroup.org/files/Staphylococcus%20aureus%20Programme%202012%20Susceptibility%20Report.pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2011 [Active Bacterial Core surveillance report]. Nov 2012. https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports-findings/survreports/mrsa11.pdf (accessed Jan 2017).
  • 9. New South Wales Health. Healthstats NSW 2016. http://www.healthstats.nsw.gov.au/Indicator/dem_pop_atsi/dem_pop_atsi_lhn_snap?filter1ValueId=18403&LocationType=Local%20Health%20District&name=Aboriginal%20Health&code=atsi%20dqi (accessed Jan 2017).
  • 10. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1270.0.55.006. Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): correspondences, July 2011. June 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1270.0.55.006Main+Features1July%202011?OpenDocument (accessed June 2015).
  • 11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility test data: approved guideline (CLSI document M39-A4). 4th edition. Wayne (PA): CLSI, 2014.
  • 12. Grayson ML, Russo PL, Cruickshank M, et al. Outcomes from the first 2 years of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 615-619. <MJA full text>
  • 13. Lawes T, Lopez-Lozano JM, Nebot CA, et al. Effects of national antibiotic stewardship and infection control strategies on hospital-associated and community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections across a region of Scotland: a non-linear time-series study. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 1438-1449.
  • 14. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance. Geneva: WHO, 2014. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/ (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 15. Australian Government Department of Health, Department of Agriculture. Responding to the threat of antimicrobial resistance. Australia’s first national antimicrobial resistance strategy 2015–2019. Canberra: Department of Health, Department of Agriculture, 2015. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/1803C433C71415CACA257C8400121B1F/$File/amr-strategy-2015-2019.pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 16. Duguid M, Cruickshank M (editors). Antimicrobial stewardship in Australian hospitals. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2011. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Antimicrobial-stewardship-in-Australian-Hospitals-2011.pdf (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 17. Turnidge J, Baggoley C, Schipp M, Martin R. Resistance sans frontières: containing antimicrobial resistance nationally and globally. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 207-208. <MJA full text>
  • 18. Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Carney J, et al. Methicillin-susceptible, non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant and multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a clinical, epidemiological and microbiological comparative study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 27: 355-364.
  • 19. Jeremiah CJ, Kandiah JP, Spelman DW, et al. Differing epidemiology of two major healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones. J Hosp Infect 2016; 92: 183-190.
  • 20. Antibiotic Reference Group. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic, version 15. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2014. https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au/guideLine?guidelinePage=Antibiotic&frompage=etgcomplete (accessed Mar 2017).
  • 21. Bowen AC, Tong SY, Andrews RM, et al. Short-course oral co-trimoxazole versus intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin for impetigo in a highly endemic region: an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 2132-2140.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Pagination

Subscribe to