Connect
MJA
MJA

The loneliness epidemic: a holistic view of its health and economic implications in older age

Lidia Engel and Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52414
Published online: 26 August 2024

Loneliness has been described as an epidemic and is one of the most pressing public health concerns in Australia and internationally.1,2 In contrast to social isolation, which is an objective measure of social interactions and relationships, loneliness is defined as a subjective experience where one perceives a discrepancy between desired and actual social relationships in terms of quality or quantity.3 Although it is common and natural to feel lonely at times, prolonged and intense periods of loneliness have been linked to adverse health outcomes.4 Older adults are more prone to loneliness and social isolation compared with other age groups.5 Reasons for this include significant life transitions and events, such as retiring from work, increased financial difficulties, loss of friends and widowhood, changes in living arrangements (eg, transitioning to residential aged care), increase in solitary living, and a decline in both health and independence.5,6 Older people at particular risk of loneliness include those living on low incomes, living with a disability, living in rural areas or with housing stress, who are single, childless or living alone, who are vulnerable or at risk of elder abuse, and those with low levels of literacy or communication technology skills (Box).7 A growing body of evidence has highlighted the significant health burden associated with loneliness, with more recent studies also suggesting that loneliness has become an economic problem due to an increase in service use and demand for institutional care. This development requires both effective and cost‐effective strategies to tackle loneliness.11,12

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • Monash University Health Economics Group (MUHEG), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC



Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Relationships Australia. Is Australia experiencing an epidemic of loneliness? Findings from 16 waves of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics of Australia Survey; working paper, September 2018. https://www.relationships.org.au/wp‐content/uploads/An‐epidemic‐of‐loneliness‐2001‐2017.pdf (viewed Jan 2024).
  • 2. Office of the Surgeon General. Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation: the US Surgeon General's Advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community; 2023. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon‐general‐social‐connection‐advisory.pdf (viewed Jan 2024).
  • 3. Lim MH, Badcok J, Smith B, et al. Ending loneliness together in Australia. Sydney: Ending Loneliness Together, 2020. https://endingloneliness.com.au/wp‐content/uploads/2020/11/Ending‐Loneliness‐Together‐in‐Australia_Nov20.pdf (viewed Jan 2024).
  • 4. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2010; 40: 218‐227.
  • 5. Lim MH, Eres R, Vasan S. Understanding loneliness in the twenty‐first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2020; 55: 793‐810.
  • 6. Engel L, Brijnath B, Chong TWH, et al. Quality of life and loneliness post‐bereavement: Results from a nationwide survey of bereaved older adults. Death Stud 2023; 47: 994‐1005.
  • 7. Mansour G. Ageing is everyone's business: a report on isolation and loneliness among senior Victorians. Melbourne: State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. https://www.seniorsonline.vic.gov.au/services‐information/ageing‐everyones‐business‐report‐social‐isolation‐and‐loneliness‐among‐senior (viewed Jan 2024).
  • 8. Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health Soc Care Community 2018; 26: 147‐157.
  • 9. Quan NG, Lohman MC, Resciniti NV, Friedman DB. A systematic review of interventions for loneliness among older adults living in long‐term care facilities. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24: 1945‐1955.
  • 10. Butler SS. Evaluating the Senior Companion Program: a mixed‐method approach. J Gerontol Soc Work 2006; 47: 45‐70.
  • 11. Kung CSJ, Kunz JS, Shields MA. Economic aspects of loneliness in Australia. Aust Econ Rev 2021; 54: 147‐163.
  • 12. Mihalopoulos C, Le LK, Chatterton ML, ET AL. The economic costs of loneliness: a review of cost‐of‐illness and economic evaluation studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2019; 55: 823‐836.
  • 13. Chawla K, Kunonga TP, Stow D, et al. Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high‐income countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0255088.
  • 14. von Soest T, Luhmann M, Hansen T, Gerstorf D. Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: its nature and correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol 2020; 118: 388‐406.
  • 15. Gardiner C, Laud P, Heaton T, Gott M. What is the prevalence of loneliness amongst older people living in residential and nursing care homes? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Age Ageing 2020; 49: 748‐757.
  • 16. Badcock JC, Lim MH, Brophy L, et al. A guide to measuring loneliness for community organisations. Ending Loneliness Together, 2021. https://endingloneliness.com.au/wp‐content/uploads/2021/08/A‐Guide‐to‐Measuring‐Loneliness‐for‐Community‐Organisations_Ending‐Loneliness‐Together.pdf (viewed Jan 2024).
  • 17. Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community 2017; 25: 799‐812.
  • 18. Holt‐Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta‐analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015; 10: 227‐237.
  • 19. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspect Biol Med 2003; 46 (Suppl): S39‐S52.
  • 20. Hajek A, Kretzler B, König HH. Multimorbidity, loneliness, and social isolation. A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 8688.
  • 21. Duncan A, Kiely D, Mavisakalyan A, et al. Stronger Together: loneliness and social connectedness in Australia. Focus on the States Series, No. 8/21; November 2021. Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre, 2021. https://bcec.edu.au/assets/2021/11/139532_BCEC‐Stronger‐Together‐report_WEB.pdf (viewed Oct 2023).
  • 22. Gerst‐Emerson K, Jayawardhana J. Loneliness as a public health issue: the impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults. Am J Public Health 2015; 105: 1013‐1019.
  • 23. Hanratty B, Stow D, Collingridge Moore D, et al. Loneliness as a risk factor for care home admission in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing 2018; 47: 896‐900.
  • 24. Valtorta NK, Moore DC, Barron L, et al. Older adults’ social relationships and health care utilization: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2018; 108: e1‐e10.
  • 25. Engel L, Lee YY, Le LK‐D, et al. Reducing loneliness to prevent depression in older adults in Australia: A modelled cost‐effectiveness analysis. Mental Health and Prevention 2021; 24; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2021.200212.
  • 26. Barjaková M, Garnero A, d'Hombres B. Risk factors for loneliness: a literature review. Soc Sci Med 2023; 334: 116163.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Developing the green operating room: exploring barriers and opportunities to reducing operating room waste

Ludmilla Pillay, Kenneth D Winkel and Timothy Kariotis
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52394
Published online: 19 August 2024

Summary

  • The Australian health care system contributes 7% of the national greenhouse gas emission footprint and generates massive waste streams annually. Operating rooms are a particular hotspot, generating at least 20% of the total hospital waste.
  • A systematic search of several global academic databases was conducted in mid‐2022 (articles from 1992 to 2022) for peer‐reviewed research relevant to waste management in the operating rooms. We then used thematic analysis to enumerate and characterise the strategies and barriers to sustainable waste management in the operating room.
  • The waste reduction strategies focused on avoidance of high carbon products; correct waste segregation and reduced overage; reusing, reprocessing, and repurposing devices; and improved recycling. The first barrier identified was a constrained interpretation of the concept of “first do not harm”, ingrained in surgeons’ practices, in prioritising single‐use surgical products. The second barrier was ineffective or insufficient waste education. The third barrier was the immediate cost of implementing waste management compared with the long term realisation of environmental and economic benefits. The last barrier to implementing institutional practice change was the lack of policies and regulations at the local hospital, federal and international levels.
  • We also evaluated the knowledge gaps in current surgical waste research, including lack of benchmarking data and standardised regulations concerning reusable or reprocessed devices, as well as the methods used to promote pro‐sustainability behavioural change.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC



Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Melbourne, as part of the Wiley ‐ The University of Melbourne agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Acknowledgements: 

We would like to acknowledge Forbes McGain (Western Health, Melbourne) for his invaluable knowledge and support on this research.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Foran P. Education report. ACORN: The Journal of Perioperative Nursing in Australia. 2015; 28: 28‐30.
  • 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospital resources 2015–16: Australian hospital statistics. 2017. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/ahs‐2015‐16‐hospital‐resources/summary (viewed Aug 2022).
  • 3. World Health Organization. Climate change. 2023. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/climate‐change‐and‐health (viewed Aug 2023).
  • 4. Lee BK, Ellenbecker MJ, Moure‐Eraso R. Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Manag 2002; 22: 461‐470.
  • 5. Lee RJ, Mears SC. Greening of orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2012; 35: e940‐944.
  • 6. Cuncannon A, Dosani A, Fast O. Sterile processing in low‐ and middle‐income countries: an integrative review. J Infect Prev 2021; 22: 28‐38.
  • 7. Wyssusek KH, Keys MT, van Zundert AAJ. Operating room greening initiatives ‐ the old, the new, and the way forward: a narrative review. Waste Manag Res 2019; 37: 3‐19.
  • 8. Rizan C, Bhutta MF, Reed M, Lillywhite R. The carbon footprint of waste streams in a UK hospital. J Clean Prod 2021; 286: 125446.
  • 9. World Health Organization. Health‐care waste. 2018. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/health‐care‐waste (viewed Sept 2022).
  • 10. Waste and climate change. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme. 2009. https://www.sprep.org/climate_change/PYCC/documents/ccwaste.pdf (viewed May 2024).
  • 11. McGain F, Jarosz K, Nguyen M, et al. Auditing operating room recycling: a management case report. A A Case Rep 2015; 5: 47‐50.
  • 12. Mahjoob A, Alfadhli Y, Omachonu V. Healthcare waste and sustainability: implications for a circular economy. Sustainability. 2023; 15: 7788.
  • 13. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. 2018 National Waste Policy: Less waste, more resources. 2018. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/waste/publications/national‐waste‐policy‐2018 (viewed Sept 2022).
  • 14. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. National Waste Policy Progress Summary Report. 2021. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national‐waste‐policy‐progress‐summary‐2021.pdf (viewed May 2024).
  • 15. Australian National Audit Office. Australian Government implementation of the National Waste Policy action plan. 2022. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance‐audit/australian‐government‐implementation‐the‐national‐waste‐policy‐action‐plan (viewed July 2023).
  • 16. Flowers A. Reconceptualising waste: Australia's national waste policies. Journal of Australian Political Economy. 2021; 87: 95‐120.
  • 17. Yates E, Bowder A, Roa L, et al. Empowering surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians to incorporate environmental sustainability in the operating room. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 1108‐1114.
  • 18. Wu S, Cerceo E. Sustainability initiatives in the operating room. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2021; 47: 663‐672.
  • 19. Chang DF, Thiel CL, Ophthalmic Instrument Cleaning and Sterilization Task Force. Survey of cataract surgeons’ and nurses’ attitudes toward operating room waste. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 933‐940.
  • 20. Jabbal I, Colibaseanu D, Blanchfield L, et al. Surgical waste in a colorectal surgery operating room: a five‐year experience. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2021; 25: 100209.
  • 21. Weiss A, Hollandsworth HM, Alseidi A, et al. Environmentalism in surgical practice. Curr Probl Surg 2016; 53: 165‐205.
  • 22. Wright RW, Brand RA, Dunn W, Spindler KP. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 23‐29.
  • 23. Qin RX, Velin L, Yates EF, et al. Building sustainable and resilient surgical systems: a narrative review of opportunities to integrate climate change into national surgical planning in the Western Pacific region. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 22: 100407.
  • 24. Kagoma Y, Stall N, Rubinstein E, Naudie D. People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms. CMAJ 2012; 184: 1905‐1911.
  • 25. Papadopoulou A, Kumar NS, Vanhoestenberghe A, Francis NK. Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review. Br J Surg 2022; 109: 921‐932.
  • 26. Shoham MA, Baker NM, Peterson ME, Fox P. The environmental impact of surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2022; 172: 897‐905.
  • 27. Bravo D, Thiel C, Bello R, et al. What a waste! The impact of unused surgical supplies in hand surgery and how we can improve. Hand (N Y) 2023; 18: 1215‐1221.
  • 28. Pradere B, Mallet R, de La Taille A, et al. Climate‐smart actions in the operating theatre for improving sustainability practices: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2023; 83: 331‐342.
  • 29. Perry H, Reeves N, Ansell J, et al. Innovations towards achieving environmentally sustainable operating theatres: a systematic review. Surgeon 2023; 21: 141‐151.
  • 30. Majernik M, Daneshjo N, Malega P, Stofkova Z. Environmental waste management of disposable surgical coverage. Pol J Environ Stud 2021; 30: 5163‐5174.
  • 31. Ubaldi K. Reprocessing single‐use devices in the ambulatory surgery environment. AORN J 2019; 109: 452‐462.
  • 32. Peričić TP, Tanveer S. Why systematic reviews matter. Elsevier. 2019. https://beta.elsevier.com/connect/why‐systematic‐reviews‐matter?trial=true (viewed Apr 2023).
  • 33. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 1758‐1772.
  • 34. Daniels K. Understanding context in reviews and syntheses of health policy and systems research. In: Langlois EV, Daniels K, Akl EA editors. Evidence synthesis for health policy and systems: a methods guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK569586/ (viewed Apr 2023).
  • 35. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster University, 2006. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster‐university/content‐assets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1‐April2006.pdf (viewed Apr 2023).
  • 36. Thiel CL, Eckelman M, Guido R, et al. Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2015; 49: 1779‐1786.
  • 37. Stall NM, Kagoma YK, Bondy JN, Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg 2013; 56: 97‐102.
  • 38. IWRG612.1: Clinical and related waste – operational guidance. Environment Protection Authority Victoria; 2009. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about‐epa/publications/iwrg612‐1 (viewed Sept 2022).
  • 39. de Sa D, Stephens K, Kuang M, et al. The direct environmental impact of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a surgical waste audit of five cases. J Hip Preserv Surg 2016; 3: 132‐137.
  • 40. Farrokhi FR, Gunther M, Williams B, Blackmore CC. Application of lean methodology for improved quality and efficiency in operating room instrument availability. J Healthc Qual 2015; 37: 277‐286.
  • 41. Harding C, Van Loon J, Moons I, et al. Design opportunities to reduce waste in operating rooms. Sustainability. 2021; 13(4): 2207.
  • 42. Vozzola E, Overcash M, Griffing E. An environmental analysis of reusable and disposable surgical gowns. AORN J 2020; 111: 315‐325.
  • 43. Weller M. A general review of the environmental impact of health care, hospitals, operating rooms, and anesthetic care. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2020; 58: 64‐69.
  • 44. Thiel CL, Woods NC, Bilec MM. Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from laparoscopic surgery. Am J Public Health 2018; 108: S158‐164.
  • 45. Candan Dönmez Y, Aslan A, Yavuz van Giersbergen M. Environment‐friendly practices in operating rooms in Turkey. J Nurs Res 2019; 27: e18.
  • 46. van Straten B, Heiden DR, Robertson D, et al. Surgical waste reprocessing: injection molding using recycled blue wrapping paper from the operating room. J Clean Prod 2021; 322: 129121.
  • 47. Wyssusek K, Keys M, Laycock B, et al. The volume of recyclable polyethylene terephthalate plastic in operating rooms ‐ a one‐month prospective audit. Am J Surg 2020; 220: 853‐855.
  • 48. Vinyl Council of Australia. Vinyl Council of Australia's PVC Recycling in Hospitals program expands in regional areas. 2022. https://vinyl.org.au/item/200‐vinyl‐council‐of‐australia‐s‐pvc‐recycling‐in‐hospitals‐program‐expands‐in‐regional‐areas (viewed Aug 2023).
  • 49. Albert MG, Rothkopf DM. Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2015; 23: 235‐238.
  • 50. Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Cheung JPY, et al. Personal protective equipment usage, recycling and disposal among spine surgeons: an Asia Pacific Spine Society survey. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2021; 29: 2309499020988176.
  • 51. Azouz S, Boyll P, Swanson M, et al. Managing barriers to recycling in the operating room. Am J Surg 2019; 217: 634‐638.
  • 52. Agrawal D, Shoup V, Montgomery A, et al. Disposal of endoscopic accessories after use: do we know and do we care? Gastroenterol Nurs 2017; 40: 13‐18.
  • 53. Petre MA, Bahrey L, Levine M, et al. A national survey on attitudes and barriers on recycling and environmental sustainability efforts among Canadian anesthesiologists: an opportunity for knowledge translation. Can J Anaesth 2019; 66: 272‐286.
  • 54. McGain F, White S, Mossenson S, et al. A survey of anesthesiologists’ views of operating room recycling. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1049‐1054.
  • 55. Tudor TL, Barr SW, Gilg AW. Linking intended behaviour and actions: a case study of healthcare waste management in the Cornwall NHS. Resour Conserv Recycl 2007; 51: 1‐23.
  • 56. Bravo D, Gaston RG, Melamed E. Environmentally responsible hand surgery: past, present, and future. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45: 444‐448.
  • 57. Rammelkamp Z, Dirnberger J, Johnson G, Waisbren S. An audit of all waste leaving the operating room: can the surgical suite be more environmentally sustainable? World Med Health Policy 2021; 13: 126‐136.
  • 58. Denny NA, Guyer JM, Schroeder DR, Marienau MS. Operating room waste reduction. AANA J 2019; 87: 477‐482.
  • 59. Brennan, B. Greening the OR: an Australian perspective. Todays OR Nurse 1994; 16: 25‐32.
  • 60. McGain F, Cox N, Cecchin S. Sustainable cardiac services – from the catheterization laboratory to the operating room and beyond. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 81‐84.
  • 61. Friedericy HJ, van Egmond CW, Vogtländer JG, et al. Reducing the environmental impact of sterilization packaging for surgical instruments in the operating room: a comparative life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable systems. Sustainability 2022; 14: 430.
  • 62. McGain F, Story D, Lim T, McAlister S. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single‐use anaesthetic equipment. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 862‐869.
  • 63. Meyer MJ, Chafitz T, Wang K, et al. Surgeons’ perspectives on operating room waste: multicenter survey. Surgery 2022; 171: 1142‐1147.
  • 64. Sherman JD, Thiel C, MacNeill A, et al. The Green Print: advancement of environmental sustainability in healthcare. Resour Conserv Recycl 2020; 161: 104882.
  • 65. Meissner M, Lichtnegger S, Gibson S, Saunders R. Evaluating the waste prevention potential of a multi‐ versus single‐use surgical stapler. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021; 14: 3911‐3921.
  • 66. Rose ED, Modlin DM, Ciampa ML, et al. Evaluation of operative waste in a military medical center: analysis of operating room cost and waste during surgical cases. Am Surg 2019; 85: 717‐720.
  • 67. Pereno A, Eriksson D. A multi‐stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: from 2030 onwards. Futures 2020; 122: 102605.
  • 68. Fischer M. Fit for the future? A new approach in the debate about what makes healthcare systems really sustainable. Sustainability 2015; 7: 294‐312.
  • 69. Shmerling RH. First, do no harm. Harvard Health, 2015. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/first‐do‐no‐harm‐201510138421 (viewed Aug 2023).
  • 70. Lee LM. A bridge back to the future: public health ethics, bioethics, and environmental ethics. Am J Bioeth 2017; 17: 5‐12.
  • 71. Sherman JD, Ryan S. Ecological responsibility in anesthesia practice. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 48: 139‐151.
  • 72. Stanford V, Barna S, Gupta D, Mortimer F. Teaching skills for sustainable health care. Lancet Planet Health 2023; 7: e64‐67.
  • 73. Borges de Oliveira K, de Oliveira OJ. Making hospitals sustainable: towards greener, fairer and more prosperous services. Sustainability 2022; 14: 9730.
  • 74. Li Y, Pan X, Han Y, Taylor JE. Sustainable healthcare facilities: a scoping review. J Constr Eng Manag 202; 147: 03121007.
  • 75. Buffoli M, Capolongo S, Bottero M, et al. Sustainable healthcare: how to assess and improve healthcare structures’ sustainability. Ann Ig 2013; 25: 411‐418.
  • 76. Buffoli M, Gola M, Rostagno M, et al. Making hospitals healthier: how to improve sustainability in healthcare facilities. Ann Ig 2014; 26: 418‐425.
  • 77. Gosselin RA, Gyamfi YA, Contini S. Challenges of meeting surgical needs in the developing world. World J Surg 2011; 35: 258‐261.
  • 78. Elliott IS, Sonshine DB, Akhavan S, et al. What factors influence the production of orthopaedic research in East Africa? A qualitative analysis of interviews. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 2120‐2130.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Priorities for planetary health equity in Australia

Sharon Friel, Katherine Trebeck, Nicholas Frank, Sandro Demaio, Megan Arthur, Chelsea Hunnisett and Francis Nona
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52397
Published online: 19 August 2024

Much evidence exists showing the very real threats to human survival, premature deaths and poor health outcomes from the nexus between the impacts of climate change and economic and social inequities.1,2 Given this crisis of planetary health equity — defined here as the equitable enjoyment of good health in a stable Earth system — preventive action is needed to address the common underlying drivers of climate change and health inequities. These drivers are located within the consumptogenic system, which is the web of institutions, actors, policies, commercial activities and norms that encourages and rewards the exploitation of natural resources, production of fossil fuels, and hyperconsumerism of fossil fuel‐reliant goods and services, which results in environmental degradation, climate change, and social and health inequities.2 In this perspective article, we relay the urgency — identified by researchers, senior bureaucrats, politicians, former business leaders and civil society groups in a Planetary Health Equity Hothouse Policy Symposium3 — for transforming the consumptogenic system, with a focus on economic models, policy coherence, and advocacy. We highlight the opportunities for the health sector to provide leadership in these issues.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Planetary Health Equity Hothouse, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT
  • 2 Edinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • 3 Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Climate and Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC
  • 6 Carumba Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD


Correspondence: sharon.friel@anu.edu.au


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by Australian National University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Australian National University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Acknowledgements: 

Sharon Friel receives funding through an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Overcoming disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes in First Nations Australians: a strategic plan for action

Jessica Howell, Troy Combo, Paula Binks, Kylie Bragg, Sarah Bukulatjpi, Kirsty Campbell, Paul J Clark, Melissa Carroll, Jane Davies, Teresa de Santis, Kate R Muller, Bella Nguyen, John K Olynyk, Nicholas Shackel, Patricia C Valery, Alan J Wigg, Jacob George and Stuart K Roberts
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52395
Published online: 12 August 2024

Every year, about 1800 Australians die of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer.1

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT
  • 6 Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA
  • 7 Miwatj Health Aboriginal Corporation, Nhulunbuy, NT
  • 8 Royal Darwin and Palmerston Hospitals, Darwin, NT
  • 9 University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
  • 10 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
  • 11 John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
  • 12 Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
  • 13 Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospital Group, Perth, WA
  • 14 Curtin University, Perth, WA
  • 15 Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA
  • 16 Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS
  • 17 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
  • 18 Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Millenium Institute, Sydney, NSW
  • 19 Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 20 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 21 Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: jess.howell@monash.edu



Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Acknowledgements: 

Jessica Howell's salary is supported by an NHMRC Investigator Fellowship, NHMRC Program grant, Burnet Institute Program grant and University of Melbourne strategic grant. We gratefully acknowledge First Nations Australians as the original custodians of this land, who have generously shared their wisdom and stories that led to and informed this work.

Competing interests:

Jessica Howell has received speaker fees and participated in advisory boards for Eisai, Astra Zeneca, Roche and Gilead; and received competitive grant funds from Gilead Sciences and Eisai. Troy Combo has participated in an advisory board for Astra‐Zeneca. Paula Binks has participated in advisory boards for Eisai and Astra‐Zeneca. Kylie Bragg has participated in an advisory board for Astra‐Zeneca. Kate Muller has participated in an advisory board for Astra‐Zeneca. Alan Wigg has participated in advisory boards for Eisai. Jacob George has participated in advisory boards and received honoraria for talks from Novo Nordisk, Astra‐Zeneca, Roche, BMS, Pfizer, Cincera, Pharmaxis, Boehringer Mannheim. Stuart Roberts has participated in advisory boards for Eisai, Astra‐Zeneca and Roche.

  • 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Liver cancer statistics. 2018. https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer‐types/liver‐cancer/statistics (viewed Mar 2024).
  • 2. Wigg AJ, Narayana SK, Hartel G, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 36: 100919.
  • 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Determinants of health for Indigenous Australians. Jul 2022. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias‐health/social‐determinants‐and‐indigenous‐health (viewed Mar 2024).
  • 4. Lubel JS, Roberts SK, Strasser SI, et al. Australian recommendations for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a consensus statement. Med J Aust 2020; 214: 475‐483. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/10/australian‐recommendations‐management‐hepatocellular‐carcinoma‐consensus
  • 5. Howell J, Ward JS, Davies J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in Indigenous Australians: a call to action. Med J Aust 2021; 214: 201‐202. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/5/hepatocellular‐carcinoma‐indigenous‐australians‐call‐action
  • 6. Howell J, Pedrana A, Cowie BC, et al. Aiming for the elimination of viral hepatitis in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Islands and Territories: where are we now and barriers to meeting World Health Organization targets by 2030. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34: 40‐48.
  • 7. Hong TP, Gow P, Fink M, et al. Novel population‐based study finding higher than reported hepatocellular carcinoma incidence suggests an updated approach is needed. Hepatology 2016; 63: 1205‐1212.
  • 8. Flores JE, Hong T, Thompson AJ, et al. Metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease and alcohol‐related liver disease are leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma: interim analysis of the HOMER‐2 study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37: 56.
  • 9. Littlejohn M, Davies J, Yuen L, et al. Molecular virology of hepatitis B virus, sub‐genotype C4 in northern Australian Indigenous populations. J Med Virol 2014; 86: 695‐706.
  • 10. Davies J, Li SQ, Tong SY, et al. Establishing contemporary trends in hepatitis B sero‐epidemiology in an Indigenous population. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0184082.
  • 11. Davies J, Bukulatjpi S, Sharma S, et al. Development of a culturally appropriate bilingual electronic app about hepatitis B for Indigenous Australians: towards shared understandings. JMIR Res Protoc 2015; 4: e70.
  • 12. Hosking K, De Santis T, Vintour‐Cesar E, et al. “The most culturally safe training I've ever had”: the co‐design of a culturally safe Managing hepatitis B training course with and for the Aboriginal health workforce of the Northern Territory of Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23: 935.
  • 13. Clark PJ, Stuart KA, Leggett BA, et al. Remoteness, race and social disadvantage: disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and survival in Queensland, Australia. Liver Int. 2015; 35: 2584‐2594.
  • 14. Australian Government. National agreement on closing the gap. Closing the gap in partnership, July 2020. https://www.closingthegap.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/national‐agreement‐ctg.pdf (viewed July 2024).
  • 15. National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 3rd ed. East Melbourne: RACGP, 2018.
  • 16. Hla TK, Bukulatjpi SM, Binks P, et al. A “one stop liver shop” approach improves the cascade‐of‐care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians living with chronic hepatitis B in the Northern Territory of Australia: results of a novel care delivery model. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19: 64.
  • 17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health survey. Dec 2019. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/aboriginal‐and‐torres‐strait‐islander‐peoples/national‐aboriginal‐and‐torres‐strait‐islander‐health‐survey/latest‐release (viewed Mar 2024).
  • 18. Howell J, Pedrana A, Schroeder SE, et al. A global investment framework for the elimination of hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2021; 74: 535‐549.
  • 19. Lubel JS, Strasser SI, Thompson AJ, et al. Australian consensus recommendations for the management of hepatitis B. Med J Aust 2022; 216: 478‐486. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2022/216/9/australian‐consensus‐recommendations‐management‐hepatitis‐b
  • 20. Pedrana A, Howell J, Scott N, et al. Global hepatitis C elimination: an investment framework. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 927‐939.
  • 21. Cooke GS, Andrieux‐Meyer I, Applegate TL, et al. Accelerating the elimination of viral hepatitis: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4: 135‐184.
  • 22. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on non‐invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis ‐ 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021; 75: 659‐689.
  • 23. Parikh ND, Singal AG, Hutton DW, Tapper EB. Cost‐effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: an assessment of benefits and harms. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1642‐1649.
  • 24. Cancer Council Australia. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance for people at high risk in Australia. 2023 [website]. https://www.cancer.org.au/clinical‐guidelines/liver‐cancer/hepatocellular‐carcinoma (viewed Mar 2024).
  • 25. Best J, Bechmann LP, Sowa JP, et al. GALAD score detects early hepatocellular carcinoma in an international cohort of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 728‐735.
  • 26. Bernardes CM, Martin J, Cole P, et al. Lessons learned from a pilot study of an Indigenous patient navigator intervention in Queensland, Australia. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12714.
  • 27. Australia and New Zealand liver and intestinal transplant registry. 34th Annual report ANZLITR, report on liver and intestinal transplantation activity to 31/12/2022. https://www.anzlitr.org/wp‐content/uploads/2024/04/ANZLITR_34th_Annual.pdf (viewed July 2024).
  • 28. Sabesan S, Poxton M. Health equity in clinical trials for regional, rural and First nations communities: need for networked clinical trial system, through a values and purpose‐aligned system culture. Aust J Rural Health 2024; 32: 588‐591.
  • 29. Panozzo S, Bryan T, Mason T, et al. Bridging cultures in palliative care: a qualitative study of the care of Indigenous Australians with advanced illness. Palliat Med 2023; 37: 498‐507.
  • 30. Morris BA, Anderson K, Cunningham J, Garvey G. Identifying research priorities to improve cancer control for Indigenous Australians. Public Health Res Pract 2017; 27: 2741735.
  • 31. D'Aprano A, Lloyd‐Johnson C, Cameron D, et al. Trusting relationships and learning together: a rapid review of Indigenous reference groups in Australian Indigenous health research. Aust N Z J Public Health 2023; 47: 100051.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Notification rates for syphilis in women of reproductive age and congenital syphilis in Australia, 2011–2021: a retrospective cohort analysis of national notifications data

Belinda Hengel, Hamish McManus, Robert Monaghan, Donna B Mak, Amy Bright, Ximena Tolosa, Kellie Mitchell, Lorraine Anderson, Jackie R Thomas, Nathan Ryder, Louise Causer, Rebecca J Guy and Skye McGregor
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52388
Published online: 29 July 2024

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate notification rates for infectious syphilis in women of reproductive age and congenital syphilis in Australia.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of national infectious syphilis and enhanced congenital syphilis surveillance data.

Setting, participants: Women aged 15–44 years diagnosed with infectious syphilis, and babies with congenital syphilis, Australia, 2011–2021.

Main outcome measures: Numbers and rates of infectious syphilis notifications, by Indigenous status and age group; numbers and rates of congenital syphilis, by Indigenous status of the infant; antenatal care history for mothers of infants born with congenital syphilis.

Results: During 2011–2021, 5011 cases of infectious syphilis in women aged 15–44 years were notified. The notification rate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women rose from 56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 45–65) cases per 100 000 in 2011 to 227 (95% CI, 206–248) cases per 100 000 population in 2021; for non‐Indigenous women, it rose from 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8–1.4) to 9.2 (95% CI, 8.4–10.1) cases per 100 000 population. The notification rate was higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women than for non‐Indigenous women (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 23.1; 95% CI, 19.7–27.1), lower for 15–24‐ (IRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6–0.9) and 35–44‐year‐old women (IRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5–0.7) than for 25–34‐year‐old women, and higher in remote regions than in major cities (IRR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.2–3.8). During 2011–2021, 74 cases of congenital syphilis were notified, the annual number increasing from six in 2011 to a peak of 17 in 2020; the rate was consistently higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants than among non‐Indigenous infants (2021: 38.3 v 2.1 per 100 000 live births). The mothers of 32 infants with congenital syphilis (43%) had not received antenatal care.

Conclusions: The number of infectious syphilis notifications for women of reproductive age increased in Australia during 2011–2021, as did the number of cases of congenital syphilis. To avert congenital syphilis, antenatal screening of pregnant women, followed by prompt treatment for infectious syphilis when diagnosed, needs to be improved.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 The Kirby Institute, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA
  • 3 Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, WA
  • 4 Office of Health Protection, Australian Department of Health, Canberra, ACT
  • 5 Public Health Intelligence Branch, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, QLD
  • 6 Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services Council Inc, Broome, WA
  • 7 Sexual Health Pacific Clinic, Hunter New England, Newcastle, NSW


Correspondence: bhengel@kirby.unsw.edu.au


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by University of New South Wales, as part of the Wiley – University of New South Wales agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Data sharing:

Applications for access to the data we analysed for this study should be directed to the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care.


Acknowledgements: 

We acknowledge the contribution and valuable insights of the Kirby Institute Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Reference Group, and State and Territory Health Department surveillance officers.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Group A streptococcal colitis: an under‐recognised entity?

Samuel W L‐W Baumgart, Suzanne English, Tony Sebastian, Sarika Suresh and Timothy J Gray
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52382
Published online: 29 July 2024

In August 2023, an otherwise healthy 54‐year‐old woman presented to hospital with acute onset fevers and sweats, followed by four days of nausea, vomiting, generalised severe abdominal pain and diarrhoea. The diarrhoea was non‐bloody, with more than ten bowel motions per day. The patient worked as a support worker for older people, and denied previous diarrhoeal illness, sick contacts, consumption of undercooked food, and recent travel.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW



Patient consent:

The patient provided written consent for publication.


Acknowledgements: 

We thank the Microbial Genomics Laboratory, NSW Health Pathology – Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, for genomic analysis of the isolate.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Breiman RF, Davis JP, Facklam RR, et al. Defining the group a streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, rationale and consensus definition. JAMA 1993; 269: 390‐391.
  • 2. Brouwer S, Rivera‐Hernandez T, Curren BF, et al. Pathogenesis, epidemiology and control of group A Streptococcus infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 2023; 21: 431‐447.
  • 3. Birrel JM, Boyd R, Currie BJ, et al. Socio‐environmental and clinical features of invasive group A streptococcal disease in the Northern Territory of Australia. Commun Dis Intell (2018) 2023; 47; https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2023.47.39.
  • 4. Department of Health and Aged Care. Group A streptococcal disease – invasive (iGAS). https://www.health.gov.au/diseases/group‐a‐streptococcal‐disease‐invasive‐igas (viewed Aug 2023).
  • 5. Maraj B, Huang A, Patel S. Acute colitis in a patient with Streptococcus pyogenes bacteraemia. Am J Med 2018; 131: e13‐e14.
  • 6. Isozaki A, Matsubara K, Yui T, et al. Group A B‐haemolytic streptococcal hemorrhagic colitis complicated with pharyngitis and impetigo. J Infect Chemother 2007; 13: 411‐413.
  • 7. Arthur C, Linam LE, Linam WM. Group A beta‐haemolytic streptococcal colitis with secondary bacteraemia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31: 1093‐1095.
  • 8. Ronnachit A, Ellenberger KA, Gray TJ, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae causing intra‐abdominal and pelvic infection: a case series. Cureus 2017; 9: e1967.
  • 9. Davis MR, Keller N, Brouwer S, et al. Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes M1UK in Australia and characterization of the mutation driving enhanced expression of superantigen SpeA. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 1051.
  • 10. Tewodros W & Kronvall G. M Protein gene (emm type) analysis of group A beta‐hemolytic streptococci from Ethiopia reveals unique patterns. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 4369‐4376.
  • 11. Sakota V, Fry A, Lietman T, et al. Genetically diverse group A streptococci from children in far‐western Nepal share high genetic relatedness with isolates from other countries. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 2160‐2166.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

National pharmacovigilance of seasonal influenza vaccines in Australia

Megan O'Moore, Belinda Jones, Megan Hickie, Catherine Glover, Lucy Deng, Yuanfei Huang, Michael Dymock, Evelyn Tay, Julie A Marsh and Nicholas Wood
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52381
Published online: 29 July 2024

The early detection of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is essential to protect public health and to maintain confidence in vaccination. Vaccine pharmacovigilance — the monitoring, detection, investigation and actioning of vaccine safety signals — occurs across a collaborative landscape that includes the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the nationally funded surveillance initiative AusVaxSafety, and state and territory health departments.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Therapeutic Goods Administration, Canberra, ACT
  • 2 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA
  • 4 Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccine and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA
  • 5 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 6 Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: megan.omoore@health.gov.au

Acknowledgements: 

AusVaxSafety surveillance is funded under a contract with the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care. The authors acknowledge the participants and staff at the surveillance sites, state and territory health departments, and Telethon Kids Institute, and the contribution of the surveillance tools SmartVax, Vaxtracker, and Microsoft COVID Vaccine Management System. The authors also wish to thank the Therapeutic Goods Administration staff of the Vaccines Surveillance Section, Adverse Event and Medicine Defects Section, and Technical and Safety Improvement Section, who support the safety surveillance of influenza vaccines.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Mimics of inflammatory bowel disease: commonly encountered differentials of an uncommon condition

Kathryn Demase and Mark G Ward
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52372
Published online: 22 July 2024

Australia has one of the highest rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the world; its prevalence has increased significantly over the past 20 years and is projected to increase by > 250% from 2010 to 2030, to then affect 1% of the population.1 Although advances in clinical practice have led to increased identification, this increase is thought to be due to urbanisation of communities, with changes in sanitation and dietary practices. Such changes seen in Asia over the past 20 years have mirrored the rapidly increasing rates of IBD in the Western society, lending support to the “hygiene hypothesis”, and explaining, in part, the increasing burden of IBD on Australian health care due to our high rates of immigration.1,2

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: mark.ward@monash.edu


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Competing interests:

Mark Ward has received educational grants and speaker fees from AbbVie, Takeda and Ferring; travel grants from Pfizer; and has served on advisory boards for AbbVie.

  • 1. Kaplan GG, Windsor JW. The four epidemiological stages in the global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 18: 56‐66.
  • 2. Mak W, Zhao M, Ng S, Burisch J. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: east meets west. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35: 380‐389.
  • 3. Phavichitr N, Cameron D, Catto‐Smith A. Increasing incidence of Crohn's disease in Victorian children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18: 329‐332.
  • 4. Schildkraut V, Alex G, Cameron D, et al. Sixty‐year study of incidence of childhood ulcerative colitis finds eleven‐fold increase beginning in 1990s. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1‐6.
  • 5. Grover Z. Predicting and preventing complications in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Transl Pediatr 2019; 8: 70‐76.
  • 6. Perler BK, Ungaro R, Baird G, et al. Presenting symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease: descriptive analysis of a community‐based inception cohort. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19: 1‐8.
  • 7. Ozer M, Bengi G, Colak R, et al. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome‐like symptoms using Rome IV criteria in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease and relation with quality of life. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e20067.
  • 8. Menees S, Powell C, Kurlander J, et al. A meta‐analysis of the utility of C‐reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin to exclude inflammatory bowel disease in adults with IBS. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 444‐454.
  • 9. Item 66522. Medicare Benefits Schedule 2023 [website]. https://www9.health.gov.au/mbs/fullDisplay.cfm?type=item&q=66522&qt=ItemID (viewed June 2024).
  • 10. Maaser C, Sturm A, Vavricka SR, et al. ECCO‐ESGAR guideline for diagnostic assessment in IBD part 1: initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13: 144‐164.
  • 11. Ward M, Kariyawasam V, Mogan S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for functional vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 2839‐2847.
  • 12. Akbulut S. An assessment of serum vitamin B12 and folate in patients with Crohn's disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101: e31892.
  • 13. Caviezel D, Maissen S, Niess J, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Intest Dis 2018; 2: 200‐210.
  • 14. Alper A, Zhang L, Pashankar D. Correlation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive protein with pediatric inflammatory bowel disease activity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017; 65: e25‐27.
  • 15. Srinivasan A, Cruz PD. Review article: a practical approach to the clinical management of NSAID enteropathy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52: 941‐947.
  • 16. Surawicz C. What's the best way to differentiate infectious colitis (acute self‐limited colitis) from IBD? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14 Suppl 2: S157‐158.
  • 17. Gazelakis K, Chu I, Martin C, et al. P320 thrombocytosis in acute inflammatory bowel disease: a useful biomarker? J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14 Suppl 1: S313‐314.
  • 18. Fernandes S, Vasconcelos‐Castro S, Teixeira C, Soares‐Oliveira M. Yersinia enterocolitis may mimic appendicitis: 12 years of experience in a single tertiary center. GE Port J Gastroenterol 2020; 28: 26‐31.
  • 19. Mellander MR, Ekbom A, Hultcrantz R, et al. Microscopic colitis: a descriptive clinical cohort study of 795 patients with collagenous and lymphocytic colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 556‐562.
  • 20. Hung A, Calderbank T, Samaan M, et al. Ischaemic colitis: practical challenges and evidence‐based recommendations for management. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 12: 44‐52.
  • 21. Cassieri C, Brandimarte G, Elisei W, et al. How to differentiate segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50 Suppl 1: S36‐38.
  • 22. Hatemi I, Hatemi G, Çelik A. Systemic vasculitis and the gut. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2017; 29: 33‐38.
  • 23. Skef W, Hamilton M, Arayssi T. Gastrointestinal Behçet's disease: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 3802‐3812.
  • 24. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Permanent migrants in Australia. Mar 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people‐and‐communities/permanent‐migrants‐australia/latest‐release (viewed July 2023).
  • 25. Choudhury A, Dhillon J, Sekar A, et al. Differentiating gastrointestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease – a comprehensive review. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23: 246.
  • 26. King J, McManus H, Kwon J, et al. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual surveillance report 2022. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, UNSW, 2022. Chrome‐extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://www.kirby.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/Annual‐Surveillance‐Report‐2022_HIV.pdf (viewed July 2023).
  • 27. Di Altobrando A, Tartari F, Filippini A, et al. Lymphogranuloma venereum proctitis mimicking inflammatory bowel diseases in 11 patients: a 4‐year single‐center experience. Crohns Colitis 360 2019; 1:otz004.
  • 28. Sheibani S, Gerson L. Chemical colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 115‐121.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

National Hypertension Taskforce of Australia: a roadmap to achieve 70% blood pressure control in Australia by 2030

Aletta E Schutte, Belinda Bennett, Clara K Chow, Geoffrey C Cloud, Kerry Doyle, Zoe Girdis, Jonathan Golledge, Andrew Goodman, Charlotte M Hespe, Meng P Hsu, Sharon James, Garry Jennings, Taskeen Khan, Audrey Lee, Lisa Murphy, Mark R Nelson, Stephen J Nicholls, Natalie Raffoul, Breonny Robson, Anthony Rodgers, Andrea Sanders, Catherine Shang, James E Sharman, Nigel P Stocks, Tim Usherwood, Ruth Webster, Jun Yang and Markus Schlaich
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52373
Published online: 12 July 2024

Raised blood pressure or hypertension is by far the leading risk factor for preventable deaths in Australia, contributing to over 25 000 deaths annually (Supporting Information, figure 1 and figure 2),1,2,3 mainly due to stroke, heart disease, kidney disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and dementia.3,4

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 4 Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Australian Cardiovascular Alliance, Sydney, NSW
  • 6 Pharmacy Guild of Australia, Canberra, ACT
  • 7 Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD
  • 8 Australian e‐Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD
  • 9 University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW
  • 10 Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care Centre of Research Excellence, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 11 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 12 Geneva, Switzerland
  • 13 Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, VIC
  • 14 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS
  • 15 Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 16 National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC
  • 17 Kidney Health Australia, Adelaide, SA
  • 18 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA
  • 19 Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC
  • 20 Dobney Hypertension Centre, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
  • 21 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA


Correspondence: a.schutte@unsw.edu.au


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by University of New South Wales, as part of the Wiley ‐ University of New South Wales agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Acknowledgements: 

Aletta Schutte is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) investigator grant (APP2017504). Jun Yang is supported by an NHMRC investigator grant (APP1994576). Clara Chow is supported by an NHMRC investigator grant (APP1195326). The National Hypertension Taskforce would like to thank all members of the International Advisory Panel (Sheldon Tobe, Norm Campbell, Mike Rakotz, Janet Wright, Paul Muntner, Andrew Moran and Pedro Ordunez) for their time and helpful guidance. We acknowledge the input and collaboration of many Australians volunteering to join working groups, workshops and other meetings to inform our decisions. We express sincere gratitude towards the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance for excellent and continued strategic and administrative support.

Competing interests:

Aletta Schutte is past president of the International Society of Hypertension, secretary of the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance, board member of Hypertension Australia. Garry Jennings is the chief medical advisor of the Heart Foundation of Australia and board member of Hypertension Australia. Markus Schlaich is the chair of Hypertension Australia, and treasurer of the World Hypertension League. Sharon James is a board director of the Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association. Mark Nelson is deputy‐chair of the Research Advisory Committee, Stroke Foundation, co‐chair of the Expert Advisory Committee CVD Guidelines, member of the Board of Hypertension Australia. Lisa Murphy is chief executive officer of the Stroke Foundation, member of the Advisory Group for the CVD Risk Guidelines. James Sharman is a board member of Hypertension Australia. Taskeen Khan works at the World Health Organization, but the views do not represent the views of the organisation. Jun Yang is a member of the Endocrine Society Primary Aldosteronism Guideline Development Panel and lead of the Primary Aldosteronism Foundation Patient Engagement Committee. Breonny Robson is general manager, Clinical & Research at Kidney Health Australia, and member of the Advisory Group for the CVD Risk Guidelines. Aletta Schutte, Markus Schlaich, James Sharman, Garry Jennings, Mark Nelson, Lisa Murphy, Andrew Goodman are members of the National Hypertension Taskforce Steering Committee. Aletta Schutte has received speaker fees from Omron, Medtronic, Aktiia, Servier, Sanofi, Novartis and is advisory board member for Skylabs and Abbott. Mark Nelson has received speaker fees from Medtronic. Stephen Nicholls has received research support from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Anthera, CSL Behring, Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Resverlogix, New Amsterdam Pharma, Novartis, InfraReDx and Sanofi‐Regeneron and is a consultant for Amgen, Akcea, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Kowa, Merck, Takeda, Pfizer, Sanofi‐Regeneron, Vaxxinity, CSL Sequiris and Novo Nordisk. Geoffrey Cloud received speaker fees from Astra Zeneca and serves on their Advisory Board. Markus Schlaich has received research support from Medtronic, ReCor (Otsuka), Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Abbott, Idorsia, Janssen, and serves on scientific advisory boards for Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis and Astra Zeneca.

  • 1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990‐2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396: 1223‐1249.
  • 2. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global burden of disease. Deaths by risk factor in Australia. IHME, 2019. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number‐of‐deaths‐by‐risk‐factor?country=~AUS (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 3. Xu X, Islam SMS, Schlaich M, Jennings G, Schutte AE. The contribution of raised blood pressure to all‐cause and cardiovascular deaths and disability – adjusted life‐years (DALYs) in Australia: analysis of global burden of disease study from 1990 to 2019. PLoS One 2024; 19: e0297229.
  • 4. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Disability adjusted life years attributable to raised systolic blood pressure, Australia. 2019. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd‐results/ (viewed June 2024).
  • 5. Schutte AE, Webster R, Jennings G, Schlaich MP. Uncontrolled blood pressure in Australia: a call to action. Med J Aust 2022; 216: 61‐63. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2022/216/2/uncontrolled‐blood‐pressure‐australia‐call‐action
  • 6. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population‐representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021; 398: 957‐980.
  • 7. World Health Organization. Global report on hypertension: the race against a silent killer. 2023. ISBN 978‐92‐4‐008106‐2. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240081062 (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 8. Australian Cardiovascular Alliance. The National Hypertension Taskforce is launched by the Honourable Mark Butler MP, Minister for Health and Aged Care [media release]. 8 Dec 2023. ozheart.org/taskforce‐launched‐by‐minister/.
  • 9. National Hypertension Taskforce of Australia [website]. https://www.hypertensiontaskforce.au (viewed July 2024).
  • 10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. High blood pressure [website]. Canberra: AIHW, 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/risk‐factors/high‐blood‐pressure/contents/summary (viewed June 2024).
  • 11. Carnagarin R, Nolde JM, Yang J, et al. Stagnating rates of blood pressure control in Australia: insights from opportunistic screening of 10046 participants of the May Measurement Month campaigns. J Hypertens 2023; 41: 632‐637.
  • 12. Roseleur J, Gonzalez‐Chica DA, Bernardo CO, et al. Blood pressure control in Australian general practice: analysis using general practice records of 1.2 million patients from the MedicineInsight database. J Hypertens 2021; 39: 1134‐1142.
  • 13. Pickersgill SJ, Msemburi WT, Cobb L, et al. Modeling global 80‐80‐80 blood pressure targets and cardiovascular outcomes. Nat Med 2022; 28: 1693‐1699.
  • 14. Rodgers A, Ezzati M, Vander HS, et al. Distribution of major health risks: findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. PLoS Med 2004; 1: e27.
  • 15. Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet 2016; 388: 2665‐2712.
  • 16. Australian Government Department of Health. National preventive health strategy 2021–2030. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2021. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/12/national‐preventive‐health‐strategy‐2021‐2030_1.pdf (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 17. Charchar FJ, Prestes PR, Mills C, et al. Lifestyle management of hypertension: International Society of Hypertension position paper endorsed by the World Hypertension League and European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2024; 42: 23‐49.
  • 18. Stroke Foundation. Australia under pressure. Australia's biggest blood pressure check report. 2018. https://strokefoundation.org.au/media/cerfkt0t/abbpc2018_australia_under_pressure_report.pdf (viewed Oct 2023).
  • 19. Si S, Moss JR, Sullivan TR, et al. Effectiveness of general practice‐based health checks: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 64: e47‐53.
  • 20. Gordon J, Britt H, Miller GC, et al. General practice statistics in Australia: pushing a round peg into a square hole. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 1912.
  • 21. NPS MedicineWise. General practice insights report July 2018 ‐ June 2019. Sydney: NPS MedicineWise, 2020.
  • 22. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Australia's primary health care 10 year plan 2022–2032. 2022. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias‐primary‐health‐care‐10‐year‐plan‐2022‐2032 (viewed June 2024).
  • 23. Khanam MA, Kitsos A, Stankovich J, et al. Association of continuity of care with blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Aust J Gen Pract 2019; 48: 300‐306.
  • 24. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Strengthening Medicare Taskforce Report 2022 https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023‐02/strengthening‐medicare‐taskforce‐report_0.pdf (viewed June 2024).
  • 25. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2020; 75: 1334‐1357.
  • 26. Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, et al. 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J Hypertens 2023; 41: 1874‐2071.
  • 27. Schutte AE, Kollias A, Stergiou GS. Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques. Nat Rev Cardiol 2022; 19: 643‐654.
  • 28. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Australian Guideline for assessing and managing cardiovascular disease risk [website]. 2023. https://www.cvdcheck.org.au/overview (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 29. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood‐pressure control. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2103‐2116.
  • 30. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1887‐1898.
  • 31. Juraschek SP, Hu JR, Cluett JL, et al. Orthostatic hypotension, hypertension treatment, and cardiovascular disease: an individual participant meta‐analysis. JAMA 2023; 330: 1459‐1471.
  • 32. Moran AE, Gupta R, Global Hearts Initiative Collaborators. Implementation of Global Hearts Hypertension Control Programs in 32 low‐ and middle‐income countries: JACC International. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82: 1868‐1884.
  • 33. World Health Organization. HEARTS Technical Package (WHO Ref. No. WHO/NMH/NVI/19.8). 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO‐NMH‐NVI‐19‐8 (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 34. Jaffe MG, Lee GA, Young JD, et al. Improved blood pressure control associated with a large‐scale hypertension program. JAMA 2013; 310: 699‐705.
  • 35. Nguyen LH, Bruyn E, Webster R, et al. Are we there yet? Exploring the use of single‐pill combination therapy in the management of raised blood pressure in Australia. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31: 954‐963.
  • 36. Parati G, Kjeldsen S, Coca A, et al. Adherence to single‐pill versus free‐equivalent combination therapy in hypertension: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hypertension 2021; 77: 692‐705.
  • 37. Salam A, Kanukula R, Atkins E, et al. Efficacy and safety of dual combination therapy of blood pressure‐lowering drugs as initial treatment for hypertension: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens 2019; 37: 1768‐1774.
  • 38. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults. 2016. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia. https://www.heartfoundation.org.au/getmedia/c83511ab‐835a‐4fcf‐96f5‐88d770582ddc/PRO‐167_Hypertension‐guideline‐2016_WEB.pdf (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 39. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ 2003; 326: 1427.
  • 40. Atkins E, Nguyen LH, Chatterton ML, et al. The costs of treating hypertension in Australia. Med J Aust 2024; in press.
  • 41. Cheung AK, Whelton PK, Muntner P, et al. International consensus on standardized clinic blood pressure measurement ‐ a call to action. Am J Med 2023; 136: 438‐445.
  • 42. Picone DS, Chapman N, Schultz MG, et al. Availability, cost, and consumer ratings of popular nonvalidated vs validated blood pressure‐measuring devices sold online in 10 countries. JAMA 2023; 329: 1514‐1516.
  • 43. Stergiou GS, Mukkamala R, Avolio A, et al. Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices: review and statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability. J Hypertens 2022; 40: 1449‐1460.
  • 44. Carter BL, Bosworth HB, Green BB. The hypertension team: the role of the pharmacist, nurse, and teamwork in hypertension therapy. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012; 14: 51‐65.
  • 45. Stephen C, Halcomb E, Fernandez R, et al. Nurse‐led interventions to manage hypertension in general practice: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78: 1281‐1293.
  • 46. Carrington MJ, Jennings GL, Harris M, et al. Impact of nurse‐mediated management on achieving blood pressure goal levels in primary care: insights from the Valsartan Intensified Primary carE Reduction of Blood Pressure Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016; 15: 409‐416.
  • 47. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Unleashing the potential of our health workforce ‐ scope of practice review [website]. 2024. https://www.health.gov.au/our‐work/scope‐of‐practice‐review (viewed June 2024).
  • 48. Australian Primary Heatlh Care Nurses Association. Nurse skills, experience being wasted despite nursing shortage ‐ national survey [media release]. 13 June 2023. https://www.apna.asn.au/about/media/archive‐media‐releases/nurse‐skills‐‐experience‐being‐wasted‐despite‐nursing‐shortage‐‐‐national‐survey (viewed June 2024).
  • 49. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. National medicines policy 2022. 2nd edition. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022‐12/national‐medicines‐policy.pdf (viewed Apr 2024).
  • 50. Gertig D, Lee J. Supporting health care providers in cancer screening: the role of the National Cancer Screening Register. Med J Aust 2023; 219: 94‐98. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2023/219/3/supporting‐health‐care‐providers‐cancer‐screening‐role‐national‐cancer‐screening
  • 51. Farley TA, Dalal MA, Mostashari F, Frieden TR. Deaths preventable in the US by improvements in use of clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 600‐609.
  • 52. Hird TR, Zomer E, Owen AJ, et al. Productivity burden of hypertension in Australia. Hypertension 2019; 73: 777‐784.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Reduced numbers of elective joint replacement procedures in Australia during the COVID‐19 pandemic, 2020–2022: a registry data analysis study

Christopher J Wall, Christopher J Vertullo, David RJ Gill, Richard S Page, Carl Holder and Paul N Smith
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52318
Published online: 10 June 2024

The osteoarthritis burden in Australia is growing,1 partly because of population growth, population ageing, and high rates of obesity and sports‐related knee injuries.2 Joint replacement is an effective treatment for people with advanced osteoarthritis; the number of procedures performed in Australia increased markedly during 2003–2019, and is projected to rise further.3

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full


Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.


  • 1 Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD
  • 2 Rural Clinical School, the University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD
  • 3 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, SA
  • 4 Knee Research Australia, Gold Coast, QLD
  • 5 Gold Coast Orthopaedic Research and Education Alliance, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD
  • 6 Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
  • 7 Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC
  • 8 South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA
  • 9 Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT


Correspondence: c.wall@uq.edu.au


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by the University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley – the University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Data sharing:

Patient‐level AOANJRR data are not publicly available for sharing.


Acknowledgements: 

Open access publishing facilitated by the University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley – the University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Competing interests:

Christopher Wall, Christopher Vertullo, David Gill, and Paul Smith are clinical directors of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Richard Page is a clinical advisor to the AOANJRR. Christopher Wall has received payments from Stryker for educational presentations. Christopher Vertullo is director of Knee Research Australia. Christopher Vertullo and David Gill are members of Prosthesis List Advisory Committee clinical advisory groups. Paul Smith is chair of the Canberra Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, and director of the Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit at the Australian National University. Richard Page and Paul Smith have received institutional support from various orthopaedic device companies.

  • 1. Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, Pratt C, et al. Counting the cost: the current and future burden of arthritis. Part 1: healthcare costs. Arthritis Australia, May 2016. https://arthritisaustralia.com.au/wordpress/wp‐content/uploads/2017/09/Final‐Counting‐the‐Costs_Part1_MAY2016.pdf (viewed July 2023).
  • 2. Hunter DJ, Bierma‐Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 2019; 393: 1745‐1759.
  • 3. Smith PN, Gill DR, McAuliffe MJ, et al. Hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2023 annual report. Data period 1 September 1999 – 31 December 2022. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/1579982/AOA_NJRR_AR23.pdf (viewed Dec 2023).
  • 4. Gill S, Graves S, Lorimer M, et al. COVID‐19 impact on joint replacement surgery in Australia in 2020: a nationwide perspective. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92: 10‐13.
  • 5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia's population to reach 30 million in 11 to 15 years. 22 Nov 2018. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/australias‐population‐reach‐30‐million‐11‐15‐years (viewed July 2023).
  • 6. Heckmann ND, Bouz GJ, Piple AS, et al. Elective inpatient total joint arthroplasty case volume in the United States in 2020: effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104: e56.
  • 7. Czubak‐Wrzosek M, Czubak J, Grzelecki D, Tyrakowski M. The effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on total hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in 2020 in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 8830.
  • 8. Barahona M, Martínez Á, Barahona M, et al. Impact of COVID‐19 outbreak in knee arthroplasty in Chile: a cross‐sectional, national registry‐based analysis. Medwave 2022; 22: e8731.
  • 9. Sayers A, Deere K, Lenguerrand E, et al. The COVID‐19 induced joint replacement deficit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. In: The National Joint Registry 18th annual report. Surgical data to 31 December 2020. 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576854 (viewed Dec 2023).
  • 10. Cobos R, Latorre A, Aizpuru F, et al. Variability of indication criteria in knee and hip replacement: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 249.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

Pagination

Subscribe to