Scientific evidence and the relationship between the medical profession, politics and the public are dynamic and inter-related
In 1848, Rudolf Virchow asserted that “medicine is a social science, and politics nothing but medicine on a grand scale”.1 Regarded by many to be the father of modern pathology, Virchow saw clear responsibilities for doctors to engage with the broader social concerns that cause illness and harm.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
Much of the work on which this article is based was undertaken while I was a 2002–2003 Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy at Harvard School of Public Health, sponsored by the Commonwealth Fund, and a Fellow in Medical Ethics at Harvard Medical School in Boston. I thank Dr John Furler of the University of Melbourne for his comments on an earlier draft.