A challenging proposal draws on the lessons learnt from the CareTrack study to pave the way towards better health care
For decades, there have been concerns about the extent to which the health system provides the right care to those who need it in a cost-effective, timely manner. In Australia, there has been much discussion1 and marked improvements in some areas,2-4 but the provision of highly variable and often inappropriate care remains a nationwide problem.1,5-7
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Buchan H, Sewell JR, Sweet M. Translating evidence into practice. Med J Aust 2004; 180 (6 Suppl): S43. <MJA full text>
- 2. Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L, et al. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004; 180 (5 Suppl): S31-S34. [not online]
- 3. Kennedy PJ, Leathley CM, Hughes CF. Clinical practice variation. Med J Aust 2010; 193 (8 Suppl): S97-S99. <MJA full text>
- 4. Scott IA, Darwin IC, Harvey KH, et al. Multisite, quality-improvement collaboration to optimise cardiac care in Queensland public hospitals. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 392-397. <MJA full text>
- 5. Evans SM, Scott IA, Johnson NP, et al. Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 360-363. <MJA full text>
- 6. Scott I. What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care? Intern Med J 2009; 39: 389-400.
- 7. Kravitz RL. Doing things better vs doing better things. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 483-485.
- 8. Hunt TD, Ramanathan SA, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000665.
- 9. Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 100-105.
- 10. Lifescripts practice manual: supporting lifestyle risk factor management in general practice. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010.
- 11. National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guidelines portal [website]. http://www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au (accessed Mar 2012).
- 12. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. Clinical indicators. http://www.achs.org.au/ClinicalIndicators (accessed Mar 2012).
- 13. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 7th ed. Melbourne: RACGP, 2009.
- 14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (UK). Published clinical guidelines. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/Published (accessed Mar 2012).
- 15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). National Guideline Clearinghouse. Guidelines by topic. http://guideline.gov/browse/by-topic.aspx (accessed Mar 2012).
- 16. Antibiotic Expert Group. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic, version 13. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2006.
- 17. National Asthma Council Australia. Asthma management handbook 2006. Melbourne: National Asthma Council, 2006.
- 18. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for acute stroke management. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2007.
- 19. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. Using systematic reviews in clinical guideline development. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001: 400-409.
- 20. Cranney M, Warren E, Barton S, et al. Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? A descriptive study. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 359-363.
- 21. Runciman WB. Is money spent on quality improvement money better spent on clinical care? No. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 641. <MJA full text>
- 22. Grol R, Buchan H. Clinical guidelines: what can we do to increase their use [editorial]? Med J Aust 2006; 185: 301-302. <MJA full text>
- 23. Brand CA, Ibrahim JE, Cameron PA, Scott IA. Standards for health care: a necessary but unknown quantity. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 257-260. <MJA full text>
- 24. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–practice gaps report, volume 1. Melbourne: NICS, 2003.
- 25. Wikipedia. Wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki (accessed Mar 2012).
- 26. Cancer Council Australia. Cancer Council Australia Wiki platform for clinical practice guidelines. http://wiki.cancer.org.au (accessed Mar 2012).
- 27. Coiera E. Why system inertia makes health reform so difficult. BMJ 2011; 342: d3693.
- 28. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Towards national indicators of safety and quality in health care. Canberra: AIHW, 2009. (AIHW Cat. No. HSE 75.)
- 29. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2725-2732.
- 30. Sequist TD, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, et al. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 431-437.
- 31. Stein EG, Haramati LB, Chamarthy M, et al. Success of a safe and simple algorithm to reduce use of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 392-397.
- 32. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Emergency department stroke and transient ischaemic attack care bundle: information and implementation package. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2009.
- 33. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2008. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign104.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
- 34. Runciman WB, Lumby J. Regulating clinical practice. In: Healy J, Dugdale P, editors. Patient safety first: responsive regulation in health care. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2009: 192-220.
No relevant disclosures.