NO: Ethicist Julian Savulescu believes patient safety lies in objective moral standards
CConscientious objection by doctors, as is commonly practised, is discriminatory medicine. Only a fully justified and publicly accepted set of objective values results in ethical medicine as a proper public service with agreed and justified moral and legal standards to which doctors should be held.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Strickland SL. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. J Med Ethics 2011; Jul 18. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1136/jme.2011.042770.
- 2. Hope T, Savulescu J, Hendrick J. Medical ethics and law: the core curriculum. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
- 3. Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. J Med Ethics 1995; 21: 327-331.
- 4. Savulescu J. Liberal rationalism and medical decision-making. Bioethics 1997; 11: 115-129.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
I receive financial support from the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education; Wellcome Trust Grant no: 086041/Z/08/Z ; and the Oxford Martin School.
No relevant disclosures.