Urologist and AMA Victoria past president Douglas Travis believes fee-for-service encourages productivity and transparency
From the perspective of doctors, patients and funders, fee-for-service is the best method of remuneration because it provides the best transparency, accountability and incentive for everyone. As a patient, you pay for what you get, and, as a doctor, you get paid for what you do. There are a number of claims for and against the fee-for-service model. I am focusing here on the specific issue of the best method of remuneration for a doctor’s efforts, and do not intend to address the separate issues of public versus private medicine, or free services versus out-of-pocket services.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Emanuel EJ, Fuchs VR. The perfect storm of overutilization. JAMA 2008; 299: 2789–2791.
- 2. Runciman WB. Is money spent on quality improvement better spent on clinical care? — No. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 641. <MJA full text>
- 3. Kohler A. New agreement a healthy way to run the system. The Drum 2011; 15 Feb. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-02-14/new-agreement-a-healthy-way-to-run-the-system/1941482 (accessed Jul 2011).
I work in the private system on a fee-for-service basis and the public system for an hourly rate of pay.