Upcoming large studies may shed light on why this technique was not rapidly widely adopted like certain other laparoscopically assisted procedures
Laparoscopic “keyhole” surgery has been the gold standard for gall bladder surgery for a few decades. It has also been widely used for appendicectomies, a multitude of gynaecological procedures and, to various extents, for other procedures such as hernia repair, splenectomy and nephrectomy. However, the uptake of laparoscopically assisted resection in elective surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) has been slow, both in Australia and overseas. This is the subject of the article by Thompson and colleagues in this issue of the Journal (→ National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 20002008).1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (Coffs Harbour Campus), Coffs Harbour, NSW.
- 1. Thompson BS, Coory MD, Lumley JW. National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000–2008. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 000-000. <MJA full text>
- 2. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 2008; 143: 832-839; discussion 839-840.
- 3. Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 583-591.
- 4. Kemp JA, Finlayson SR. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1181-1187.
- 5. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 819-824.
- 6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
- 7. Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 291-307.
- 8. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (3): CD003145.
- 9. Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 728-738.
- 10. Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, et al. Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study shows that elderly patients may benefit from lower postoperative complication rates following laparoscopic versus open resection. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 86-91.
- 11. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1111-1124.
- 12. Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 508-516.
- 13. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 480-486; discussion 486-487.
- 14. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 144-150.
- 15. Terblanche J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new milestone or a dangerous innovation? HPB Surgery 1991; 3: 177-180.
- 16. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the new “gold standard”? Arch Surg 1992; 127: 917-923.
- 17. Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 227-230.
- 18. Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 335-343.
- 19. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1119-1131.
- 20. Abraham N, Albayati S. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 3: 1-6.
- 21. World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal. Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). A La CaRT: Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial A phase III prospective randomised trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted resection versus open resection for rectal cancer. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.aspx?trialid=ACTRN12609000663257 (accessed Apr 2011).
- 22. Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B, et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 2006; 6: 16.