Could a technique using fetal DNA from the maternal circulation mean the end of invasive prenatal testing?
Since the first application of ultrasound to it 50 years ago, the “black box” that is the pregnant uterus has gradually yielded to efforts to gain increasingly precise information about the condition of the fetus. Technological advances in ultrasound and, more recently, magnetic resonance imaging have seen the production of high-resolution displays of fetal anatomy and physiology. Specific information about the fetal genome, however, has until now only been available through the application of invasive techniques. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling have been used to diagnose fetal aneuploidy (such as Down syndrome) and an ever-increasing range of genetic conditions. But these invasive procedures come at a cost — an associated 1% risk of pregnancy loss1 limits their application and causes significant stress for women thinking of undertaking such testing. Screening tests such as ultrasound and maternal serum screening to assess aneuploidy risk have been developed to allow more judicious application of invasive procedures, but of themselves cannot accurately diagnose the fetal condition, and false negatives and positives both occur.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
- 2 Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
- 1. Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 687-694.
- 2. Hyland CA, Gardener GJ, Davies H, et al. Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal RHD genotyping of the fetus. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 21-25. <MJA full text>
- 3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines on the prophylactic use of Rh D immunoglobulin (anti-D) in obstetrics. Canberra: NHMRC, 1999: 11-14.
- 4. Lo YM, Tein MS, Lau TK, et al. Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 768-775.
- 5. Lo YM, Hjelm NM, Fidler C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1734-1738.
- 6. Geifman-Holtzman O, Grotegut CA, Gaughan JP. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood — a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1163-1173.
- 7. Crowther CA, Middleton P. Anti-D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1997; (2): CD000021.
- 8. Chilcott J, Lloyd-Jones M, Wight J, et al. A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are Rhesus (RhD) negative. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2002.
- 9. Müller SP, Bartels I, Stein W, et al. The determination of fetal D status from maternal plasma for decision making on Rh prophylaxis is feasible. Transfusion 2008; 48: 2292-2301.
- 10. Bustamante-Aragones A, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Gallego-Merlo J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of Huntington disease in maternal plasma: direct and indirect study. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 1338-1344.
- 11. Bustamante-Aragones A, Gallego-Merlo J, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, et al. New strategy for the prenatal detection/exclusion of paternal cystic fibrosis mutations in maternal plasma. J Cyst Fibros 2008; 7: 505-510.
- 12. Costa JM, Benachi A, Gautier E. New strategy for prenatal diagnosis of X-linked disorders [letter]. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1502.
- 13. Lo YMD. Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma nucleic acid analysis: a review of the current state of the art. BJOG 2009; 116: 152-157.