To the Editor: Hickie and Blashki are to be commended for their view that clinical practice guidelines in mental health should be relevant to a primary care setting.1 Unfortunately, such guidelines have little effect on clinical outcomes, as most general practitioners have not been taught how to use them to their best advantage.2 There is also little known about the best way to implement guidelines in mental health, let alone in primary care mental health settings.3 As a result, more guidelines, even those more attuned to the primary care environment, will be of little benefit to our community.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Quality Improvement Committee, Melbourne, VIC.
- 1. Hickie IB, Blashki GA. Evidence into practice: the mental health hurdle is high. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 542-543. <eMJA full text> <MJA full text>
- 2. Woolf S. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 946-952.
- 3. Rush J. Clinical practice guidelines: good news, bad news, or no news? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 483-490.
- 4. Barton D, Codyre D, Lovelock H, et al. Implementation of the RANZCP Clinical Practice Guidelines. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: A123-A124.
- 5. Australian Research Council. Priority areas for ARC funding. http://www.arc.gov.au/grant_programs/priority_areas.htm (accessed Aug 2006).