To the Editor: We now know the outcome of the parliamentary vote on mifepristone (RU-486), which restored responsibility for its use to the Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA). Politicians from both houses used their conscience votes to support the scientific scrutiny of medical abortion. van Gend will now be worried about Australian women “demanding” abortions.1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT.
Correspondence: suzanne.belton@cdu.edu.au
- 1. van Gend D. Mifepristone (RU-486) and limits to abortion [letter]. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 139. <MJA full text>
- 2. de Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Abortion: time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 201-203. <MJA full text>
- 3. Opposition questions church pregnancy counselling plan. ABC News Online 2006; 19 Feb. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200602/s1573345.htm (accessed Feb 2006).
- 4. Children by Choice Association. Australian abortion law and practice. Fact sheet. Available at: http://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/nwww/auslawprac.htm (accessed Feb 2006).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.