To the Editor: The article by Senanayake and Ferson1 on detention for tuberculosis included two case histories. In the case of “Patient 2”, we believe the details published were misleading and unnecessarily disclosed potentially identifying information. This case was presented in sufficient detail to allow identification of “Patient 2” by including date of admission, personal details, city of admission and details regarding his past history of alcohol addiction and attempts to self-discharge. All this information was not necessary and did not take into account all the relevant medical complicating factors.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Senanayake SN, Ferson MJ. Detention for tuberculosis: public health and the law. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 573-576. <MJA full text>
- 2. Locking up TB cases defended. The Sydney Morning Herald 2004; 7 Jun: 5.
- 3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines approved under Section 95A of the Privacy Act 1988. Canberra: NHMRC, 2001: 35-46. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/pdf/e43.pdf (accessed Oct 2004).
- 4. Wilkins D, Woolcock AJ, Cossart YE. Tuberculosis: medical students at risk. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 395-397.
Names withheld to protect patient privacy