Connect
MJA
MJA

Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course

Martin B Van Der Weyden
Med J Aust 2004; 181 (8): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06387.x
Published online: 18 October 2004

Martin B Van Der Weyden


  • The Medical Journal of Australia, Locked Bag 3030, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012. medjaustATampco.com.au


Correspondence: medjaust@ampco.com.au

  • 1. Jamrozik K. Ethics committees: is the tail wagging the dog? Med J Aust 1992; 157: 636-637.
  • 2. Lowenthal RM. Outdated ethical review system impedes important research [letter]. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 51.
  • 3. Roberts LM, Bowyer L, Homer CS, Brown MA. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course [letter]. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 139.
  • 4. National Health and Medical Research Council. When does quality assurance in healthcare require independent ethical review? Canberra: NHMRC, 2003. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/pdf/e46.pdf (accessed Sep 2004).
  • 5. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. 1999. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/pdf/e35.pdf (accessed Aug 2004).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.