Connect
MJA
MJA

In reply: Boundaries of medicine

Martin B Van Der Weyden
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (4)
Published online: 17 February 2003

In reply: Russell implies that my recent column on the boundaries of medicine1 conveys the premise that medicine is a defined and discrete discipline underpinned by biomedical science. So it did, but the contention is not mine, it is that of Seldin.2

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.




Correspondence: 

  • 1. Van Der Weyden MB. The boundaries of medicine [From the editor's desk]. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 465.<eMJA full text>
  • 2. Seldin DW. Presidential address. Trans Assoc Am Phys 1981; 94: lxxv-lxxxvi.
  • 3. Peabody FW. The care of the patient. JAMA 1927; 88: 877-882.
  • 4. Fitzpatrick M. The tyranny of health. London: Routledge, 2001.
  • 5. Smith R. In search of "non-disease". BMJ 2002; 324: 883-885.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.