Connect
MJA
MJA

Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in Australia: current and future perspectives

Naomi CA Whyler, Sushena Krishnaswamy and Michelle L Giles
Med J Aust 2024; 221 (7): 396-396. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52440
Published online: 7 October 2024

To the Editor: We read with interest the excellent review by Hui and colleagues1 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in Australia. HCC is increasing in incidence in Australia, and is often diagnosed late, when curative options are limited and mortality rates are high.1 Surveillance is recommended in high risk individuals but uptake is suboptimal; a centralised surveillance program may provide an improved model of care delivery.1 However, screening programs may only be successful in those with a diagnosis of a condition that increases their risk of HCC.

Improved case‐finding strategies are recommended;1 however, an important group not discussed in this article is pregnant people. This is a unique population who is universally tested for hepatitis B in Australia,2 and who is often interacting with the health care system for the first time at a young age, without other comorbid conditions. In those at high risk of progression to HCC, such as women from sub‐Saharan Africa aged over 20 years, antenatal diagnosis provides an opportunity for education. Linkage to specialist care during pregnancy also enables the development of an HCC surveillance plan to maximise the opportunities for early diagnosis of complications.

There is evidence to suggest that, in Australia, people who are diagnosed during pregnancy with a medical condition that is associated with long term complications, such as gestational diabetes3 and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy,4 often do not engage in recommended follow‐up care in the postpartum period. Postpartum retention in care in those with hepatitis B in Australia is poorly documented, but appears similar to other antenatally diagnosed conditions, with existing data estimating that less than half engage with hepatitis B care during the first year postpartum.5 In addition to the barriers to accessing surveillance outlined by Hui and colleagues,1 engagement in care during the postpartum period may be hampered by the need to juggle family and child care responsibilities, return to the workforce, and access to child care to allow attendance at appointments.

We recommend integrating existing antenatal screening and diagnosis into strategies to identify those at high risk who may benefit from HCC surveillance, and optimising postpartum pathways of care to support these individuals.


  • Naomi CA Whyler1,2
  • Sushena Krishnaswamy1,3
  • Michelle L Giles1,3

  • 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: naomi.whyler@monash.edu

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.