The COVID‐19 pandemic has necessitated rapid uptake and use of telehealth, unmasking a number of concerns potentially not previously contemplated by clinicians, patients and legislators
In the physical distancing climate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), the ubiquity of virtual communications in medical practice generates a number of challenges. Consultation via telehealth allows for creation of audiovisual documentation of the clinical interaction as well as observation by unseen parties from each participant’s perspective, either in real time or subsequently via review of any recordings. It is necessary for clinicians to i) obtain informed consent for clinician‐led recordings, ii) be aware of potential patient‐generated recordings (both declared and undeclared), and iii) meet legal, privacy and storage requirements pertaining to health information arising from a virtual consultation.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Neil J. Domestic violence and COVID‐19: Our hidden epidemic. Aust J Gen Pract 2020; https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-COVID-25 [Epub ahead of print].
- 2. Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 133.
- 3. Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (VIC).
- 4. Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (QLD).
- 5. Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NT).
- 6. Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (VIC), s 11(2)(c).
- 7. Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), s 6FA.
- 8. Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
- 9. Mahar PD, Foley PA, Sheed‐Finck A, Baker CS. Legal considerations of consent and privacy in the context of clinical photography in Australian medical practice. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 48–49. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/1/legal-considerations-consent-and-privacy-context-clinical-photography-australian
No relevant disclosures.