To the Editor: Teede's inspirational, forward‐looking review1 should also prompt scrutiny of the philosophical constructs underpinning gender equity.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Teede HJ. Advancing women in medical leadership. Med J Aust 2019; 211: 392–394. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2019/211/9/advancing-women-medical-leadership
- 2. MacDonald H. Are we all unconscious racists? City Journal 2017; Autumn. https://www.city-journal.org/html/are-we-all-unconscious-racists-15487.html (viewed Sept 2019).
- 3. Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, et al. Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. J Pers Soc Psychol 2015; 108: 562–571.
- 4. Mitchell G, Tetlock PE. Popularity as a poor proxy for utility: the case of implicit prejudice. In: Lilienfeld SO, Waldman ID, editors. Psychological science under scrutiny: recent challenges and proposed solutions. Washington: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2017.
- 5. Australian Human Rights Commission. Guidelines: Special measures under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth). Sydney: AHRC, 2018 https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/AHRC_SDA_Special_Measures_Guidelines%202018.pdf (viewed Sept 2019).
- 6. Supreme Court of the United States. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs et al v Inclusive Communities Project. No. 13–1371. 25 June 2015. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1371_8m58.pdf (viewed Sept 2019).
- 7. Keane M. You can't beat gender bias with gender bias. MJA Insight 2017; 25 Sept. https://insightplus.mja.com.au/2017/37/you-cant-beat-gender-bias-with-gender-bias/ (viewed Sept 2019).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
No relevant disclosures.