Tiered universal screening systems that save lives are cost‐effective
About 15–20% of colorectal cancers exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI) caused by deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR).1 Most of these cancers (80%) are sporadic, associated with hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene promoter. Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations affecting one of the MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2), and accounts for 15–20% of MMR‐deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers, or 2–5% of all colorectal cancers, making it the most common hereditary colorectal cancer predisposition syndrome.2 People with Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of several cancer types, especially colorectal cancer: the risk by age 70 years is 10–82%, depending on the mutant gene, considerably higher than that of the general population (4.5%).3
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 5248–5257.
- 2. Lynch HT, Snyder CL, Shaw TG, et al. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer 2015; 15: 181–194.
- 3. Møller P, Seppälä T, Bernstein I, et al. Cancer incidence and survival in Lynch syndrome patients receiving colonoscopic and gynaecological surveillance: first report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut 2017; 66: 464–472.
- 4. Hampel H, Frankel WL, Martin E, et al. Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1851–1860.
- 5. Hampel H, Frankel W, Panescu J, et al. Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7810–7817.
- 6. Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Genet Med 2009; 11: 35–41.
- 7. Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, et al; US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi‐Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 502–526.
- 8. Stoffel EM, Mangu PB, Gruber SB, et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology; European Society of Clinical Oncology. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement of the familial risk‐colorectal cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 209–217.
- 9. Gallego CJ, Shirts BH, Bennette CS, et al. Next‐generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 2084–2091.
- 10. Kang YJ, Killen J, Caruana M, et al. The predicted impact and cost‐effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 72–81.
- 11. Ladabaum U, Wang G, Terdiman J, et al. Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 69–79.
- 12. Webber EM, Kauffman TL, O'Connor E, Goddard KA. Systematic review of the predictive effect of MSI status in colorectal cancer patients undergoing 5FU‐based chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 156.
- 13. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD‐1 blockade in tumors with mismatch‐repair deficiency. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2509–2520.
No relevant disclosures.