New health information technologies have the potential to transform the delivery of mental health care
The World Economic Forum has highlighted the capacity for health information technologies to transform health care.1 Four key care themes emerge: smart care (emphasising precision medicine); care anywhere (promoting access closer to home); empowered care (engaging people in their own care); and intelligent health enterprises (using data to drive new solutions).1 More recently, the World Economic Forum has focused on the digital transformation of mental health care,2 highlighting the need to address ethical issues such as privacy, trust and clinical governance.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. World Economic Forum. Empowering 8 billion minds: enabling better mental health for all via the ethical adoption of technologies. Geneva: WEF, 2019. https://apo.org.au/node/245566?utm_source=APO-feed&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=rss-all (viewed Aug 2019).
- 2. World Economic Forum. Digital transformation of industries: in collaboration with Accenture. Geneva: WEF, 2016. http://reports.weforum.org/digital-transformation/wp-content/blogs.dir/94/mp/files/pages/files/digital-enterprise-narrative-final-january-2016.pdf (viewed Aug 2019).
- 3. Hayat Z. Why is there no Uber for health care? Huffington Post 2016; 27 Sep. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/zeeshan-hayat/health-care-uber_b_12200712.html (viewed Aug 2019).
- 4. Bush J, Fox J. Bringing the power of platforms to healthcare. Harvard Bus Rev 2016; 10 Nov. https://hbr.org/2016/11/bringing-the-power-of-platforms-to-health-care (viewed Aug 2019).
- 5. D'Urbino L. Surgical intervention: Apple and Amazon's moves in health signal a coming transformation. The Economist 2018; 3 Feb. https://www.economist.com/business/2018/02/03/apple-and-amazons-moves-in-health-signal-a-coming-transformation (viewed Aug 2019).
- 6. World Health Organization. Investing in mental health: evidence for action. Geneva: WHO, 2013. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/87232/9789241564618_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (viewed Aug 2019).
- 7. World Health Organization. Mental health action plan 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO, 2013. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/89966/9789241506021_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (viewed Aug 2019).
- 8. Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Whiteford H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet 2007; 370: 878–889.
- 9. Torous J, Roberts L. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74: 437–438.
- 10. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Araya R, et al. Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low‐income and middle‐income countries: a narrative review of the literature. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4: 486–500.
- 11. Hirshon JM, Risko N, Calvello EJB, et al. Health systems and services: the role of acute care. Bull World Health Organ 2013; 91: 386–388.
- 12. Iorfino F, Cross SP, Davenport T, et al. A digital platform designed for youth mental health services to deliver personalized and measurement‐based care. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 595.
- 13. Orlinsky DE, Rønnestad MH, Willutzki U. Fifty years of psychotherapy process‐outcome research: continuity and change. In: Lambert MJ, editor. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 2004: pp. 307–390.
- 14. Germain V, Marchand A, Bouchard S, et al. Assessment of the therapeutic alliance in face‐to‐face or videoconference treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010; 13: 29–35.
- 15. Sucala M, Schnur JB, Constantino JM, et al. The therapeutic relationship in e‐therapy for mental health: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e110.
- 16. Wrzesien M, Bretón‐López J, Botella C, et al. How technology influences the therapeutic process: evaluation of the patient‐therapist relationship in augmented reality exposure therapy and in vivo exposure therapy. Behav Cogn Psychother 2013; 41: 505–509.
- 17. Torous J, Larsen ME, Depp C, et al. Smartphones, sensors, and machine learning to advance real‐time prediction and interventions for suicide prevention: a review of current progress and next steps. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2018; 20: 51.
- 18. Australian Digital Health Agency. Safe, seamless and secure: evolving health and care to meet the needs of modern Australia: Australia's National Digital Health Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government, 2017. https://conversation.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/adha-strategy-doc-2ndaug_0_1.pdf (viewed Aug 2019).
- 19. Hickie IB, Davenport TA, Burns J. Project Synergy: co‐designing technology‐enabled solutions for Australian mental health services reform. Med J Aust 2019; 211(7 Suppl): S1–S39.
- 20. Davenport TA, LaMonica HM, Whittle L, et al. Validation of the InnoWell Platform: protocol for a clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8: e13955.
- 21. LaMonica HM, Davenport TA, Braunstein K, et al. An implementation science framework for technology‐enabled person‐centred mental health services reform. JMIR Ment Health 2019; https://doi.org/10.2196/14719.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
Project Synergy is an Australian Government Department of Health‐funded initiative that is administered by InnoWell Pty Ltd (a joint venture between the University of Sydney and PwC [Australia]).
Professor Ian Hickie is the Scientific Advisor to, and an equity shareholder in, InnoWell Pty Ltd. InnoWell has been formed by the University of Sydney and PwC [Australia] to deliver the $30 million Australian Government‐funded Project Synergy. Project Synergy is a 3‐year program for the transformation of Australian mental health services through the use of new and innovative technologies.