Connect
MJA
MJA

Appropriateness of care: why so much variation

Richard C Madden, Andrew Wilson and Philip Hoyle
Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.01041
Published online: 21 November 2016

Broad descriptions of variation are a useful way of finding disparities, but to generate change they need to be carefully analysed and applied

The Supplement accompanying this issue of the MJA addresses variation in health care delivery as an important theme in ensuring appropriate care across the health system. While all would agree that health care should be provided as and where needed, and that only appropriate care should be delivered, difficulties arise when seeking consensus on what variation is “appropriate” and what should be done about it.


  • 1 National Centre for Classification in Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW



Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework 2014 report: detailed analyses (AIHW Cat. No. IHW 167). Canberra: AIHW, 2015.
  • 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics (AIHW Cat. No. HSE 172). Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
  • 3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Atlas of health care variation. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2015. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/atlas (accessed Oct 2016).
  • 4. Buchan HA, Duggan A, Hargreaves J, et al. Health care variation: time to act. Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S30-S33.
  • 5. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Exploring healthcare variation in Australia: analyses resulting from an OECD study. Sydney: ACSQHC 2014.
  • 6. Da Silva P, Gray JAM. English lessons: can publishing an atlas of variation stimulate the discussion on appropriateness of care? Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S5-S7.
  • 7. Ketelaar N, Faber M, Flottorp S, et al. Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11): CD004538.
  • 8. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (4): CD005470.
  • 9. Atkinson J, Patel C, Wilson A. Drivers of large-scale change in complex health systems: an Evidence Check rapid review brokered by the Sax Institute for the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. Sydney: Sax Institute, 2013.
  • 10. Duckett S, Griffiths K. Perils of place: identifying hotspots of health inequalities. Melbourne: Grattan Institute, 2016.
  • 11. Hall JP, van Gool KC. Paying hospitals for quality: can we buy better care? Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S27-S29.
  • 12. Chew DP, Herkes R, Page MA. Clinical care standards: appropriate care everywhere — acute coronary syndromes as an example. Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S8-S11.
  • 13. Caplan GA, Kurrle SE, Cumming A. Appropriate care for older people with cognitive impairment in hospital. Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S12-S15.
  • 14. Turnidge JD, Thursky K, Chen CS. Antimicrobial use in Australian hospitals: how much and how appropriate? Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S16-S20.
  • 15. Wilcox N, McNeil JJ. Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care. Med J Aust 2016; 205 (10 Suppl): S21-S26.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.