For many clinicians, statistics is the equivalent of a foreign language: they may know a few words here and there from their travels, but they have never had the time to learn the language properly. As health care providers, we are increasingly being asked to engage in critical appraisal and sort through the large volume of research to help guide decision making. For many, this means reading mainly the abstract and the discussion, and glossing over the jargon in the methods and results. This is unfortunate, as the methods can obviously make or break the validity of the results and determine whether we decide that a study is valid and practice changing, or fatally flawed and pointless.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.
- 2. Canadian Medical Association Journal [website]. Basic statistics for clinicians. Ottawa: CMAJ; 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/eppp-archive/100/201/300/cdn_medical_association/cmaj/series/stats.htm (accessed Sept 2016).
- 3. The BMJ [website]. Statistics notes. London: BMJ; 2016. http://www.bmj.com/specialties/statistics-notes (accessed Sept 2016).
No relevant disclosures.