Do we equip junior specialists with the skills to conduct research throughout their careers?
The application of an evidence-based approach to patient care underpins modern clinical practice for all medical disciplines. In many specialty training programs, there has been emphasis in recent years on ensuring that trainees develop the skills needed to interpret medical literature and conduct research, as a part of overall training. In turn, it is hoped that these abilities will instil in trainees the capacity and enthusiasm to continue taking an active part in clinical research over their careers. In addition, specialist doctors are ideally placed to direct efforts towards medical education research and research on translation of evidence to practice. In this article, we focus on the need to assist trainees in attaining foundation skills required for participation in research activities, ideally as a stepping stone to leadership in research. This is distinct from looking at tools and strategies (such as journal clubs and critically appraised topic instruments) used to teach critical appraisal of published evidence, although all these concepts are closely linked.1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, et al. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11): CD001270.
- 2. Windish DM, Huot SJ, Green ML. Medicine residents’ understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. JAMA 2007; 298: 1010-1022.
- 3. Freeman J, Collier S, Staniforth D, Smith K. Innovations in curriculum design: a multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 28.
- 4. Ioannidis J, Greenland S, Hlatky M, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383: 166-175.
- 5. Franks J. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007; 29: 642-647.
- 6. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. RANZCR Radiation Oncology Training Program Curriculum. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/radiation-oncology/training-in-radiation-oncology (accessed Nov 2015).
- 7. Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Medical oncology advanced training curriculum — adult medicine division. 2013. https://members.racp.edu.au/page/advanced-curricula (accessed Nov 2015).
- 8. Ologunde R, Di Salvo I, Khajuria A. The CanMEDS scholar: the neglected competency in tomorrow’s doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014; 5: 383-384.
- 9. Australia and Asia Pacific Clinical Oncology Research Development Initiative. ACORD 2016 Workshop. http://acord.org.au/index.asp (accessed Nov 2015).
- 10. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Critical Literature Evaluation and Research (CLEAR). http://www.surgeons.org/for-health-professionals/register-courses-events/skills-training-courses/clear (accessed Nov 2015).
- 11. Thiruthaneeswaran N, Turner S, Milross C, Gogna K. Promoting a research culture among junior radiation oncologists: outcomes from the introduction of the Australian and New Zealand research requirement in training. Clin Oncol 2014; 26: 162-173.
No relevant disclosures.