Cardiology networks can encourage appropriate transfer to tertiary care and improve outcomes for acute coronary syndromes
Not only is there a troubling disparity in cardiac health between urban and rural communities,1 there is now considerable evidence that patients who suffer a suspected heart attack (acute coronary syndrome [ACS]) in smaller hospitals in rural areas may not receive state-of-the-art coronary reperfusion treatment2 or optimal care in the medical management of their ACS.3 There is overwhelming evidence that the best treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is coronary reperfusion as soon as possible4 and that the outcome for non-STEMI is better if coronary angiography is performed during the initial hospital admission.5 Unfortunately, timely cardiac catheterisation in a centre capable of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an ideal not always available. Long distances from rural centres to advanced cardiac care facilities is an Australian reality, and it is unrealistic to hope for sophisticated cardiac facilities in every country town, although there has been successful establishment of regional cardiac facilities in some states. Certain major rural hubs, such as Wagga Wagga, have had cardiac catheterisation facilities since 1997, and many of these centres have been PCI capable for some time.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Sexton PT, Sexton TLH. Excess coronary mortality among Australian men and women living outside the capital city statistical divisions. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 370-374. <MJA full text>
- 2. Chew DP, Amerena JV, Coverdale SG, et al; ACACIA investigators. Invasive management and late clinical outcomes in contemporary Australian management of acute coronary syndromes: observations from the ACACIA registry. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 691-697. <MJA full text>
- 3. Chew DP, French J, Briffa TG, et al. Acute coronary syndrome care across Australia and New Zealand: the SNAPSHOT ACS study. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 185-191. <MJA full text>
- 4. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: e78-e140.
- 5. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2013; 127: e663-e828.
- 6. Tideman PA, Tirimacco R, Senior DP, et al. Impact of a regionalised clinical cardiac support network on mortality among rural patients with myocardial infarction. Med J Aust 2014; 200: 157-160.
- 7. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. DANAMI-2 Investigators. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733-742.
- 8. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13-20.
- 9. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, et al; STREAM Investigative Team. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1379-1387.
No relevant disclosures.