Connect
MJA
MJA

Global health training and postgraduate medical education in Australia: the case for greater integration

Kieran Walsh
Med J Aust 2013; 199 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10457
Published online: 22 July 2013

To the Editor: Mitchell and colleagues have done medical education a service by outlining all the potential benefits and harms associated with global health training.1 They are right to state that sustainability is key — however, all too often in the past, it has been sustainability that has been lacking. According to Yikona, writing in 2003: “Case by case analysis of medical schools in sub-Saharan Africa would show an excellent first 10 years followed by a general downward spiral”.2 How are we to stop global health training going into a similar downward spiral?


  • BMJ Learning, London, UK.


Correspondence: kmwalsh@bmjgroup.com

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Mitchell RD, Jamieson JC, Parker J, et al. Global health training and postgraduate medical education in Australia: the case for greater integration. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 316-319. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Yikona J. Sustaining medical education is difficult in poor countries [letter]. BMJ 2003; 326: 51.
  • 3. Harden RM. Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 798-802.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.