Do-it-yourself mail-order tests — how should a doctor deal with them?
Health-related direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing enables consumers to test for changes in their genome that may assist with diagnosis or screening for particular disorders or traits, and may help predict future disease or response to treatments. DTC testing allows this to be under the consumer’s control and, at least initially, does not involve a medical practitioner in ordering or interpreting the test. However, this control is traded off against uncertainty about how clinically relevant the tests or their results are for consumers and their families. There are important ethical and legal considerations, particularly if these tests are ordered from overseas laboratories. Consequently, for medical practitioners, DTC testing poses the problem of how it can be assimilated into practice.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Australian Law Reform Commission and Australian Health Ethics Committee. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia. ALRC 96. Canberra: Australian Government, 2003. http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-96 (accessed Sep 2012).
- 2. Dvoskin R, Kaufman D. Tables of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies and conditions tested — August 2011. Washington: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2011. http://www.dnapolicy.org/pub.reports.php?action=detail&report_id=28 (accessed Apr 2013).
- 3. 23and Me. Health reports: complete list. https://www.23andme.com/health/all/ (accessed Sep 2012).
- 4. easyDNA. Genetic predisposition report. http://www.easydna.com.au/pdfs/health-DNA-genetic-test.pdf accessed Apr 2013).
- 5. Ng PC, Murray SS, Levy S, Venter JC. An agenda for personalized medicine. Nature 2009; 461: 724-726.
- 6. Royal College of Pathologists of Australia. RCPA catalogue of genetic tests and laboratories. http://genetictesting.rcpa.edu.au/ (accessed Sep 2012).
- 7. Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 524-534.
- 8. Brett GR, Metcalfe SA, Amor DJ, Halliday JL. An exploration of genetic health professionals’ experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 825-830.
- 9. United States Government Accountability Office. Nutrigenetic testing: tests purchased from four web sites mislead consumers. www.gao.gov/new.items/d06977t.pdf (accessed Sep 2012).
- 10. United States Government Accountability Office. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: misleading test results are further complicated by deceptive marketing and other questionable practices www.gao.gov/new.items/d10847t.pdf (accessed Sep 2012).
- 11. New guidelines for genetic tests are welcome but insufficient. Lancet 2010; 376: 488.
I am director of a genetic testing service in a New South Wales public hospital.