To the Editor: The donation after cardiac death (DCD) procedure used by Coulson and colleagues1 is ethically problematic and is not, as claimed, re-implementation of the practice followed before brain-death organ donation protocols were introduced. First reported in 1992, the more precise term is controlled donation after cardiac death or controlled non-heart-beating organ donation.2 What is controlled is the timing, mode and criteria of death, and its location (operating theatres). The threshold medical decision is to remove life-support and allow the patient to die. The aim of the procedure is to seize the opportunity to procure a particular kind of death within a particular time frame for organ transplant purposes. The procedure fails if the patient survives past the point for organ viability (usually 60 minutes).
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Coulson TG, Pilcher DV, Graham SM, et al. Single-centre experience of donation after cardiac death. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 166-169. <MJA full text>
- 2. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM. Ethical, psychosocial and public policy implications of procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors. JAMA 1993; 269: 2769-2774.
- 3. Potts M. Truthfulness in transplantation: non-heart-beating organ donation. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2007; 2: 17. http://www.peh-med.com/content/2/1/17 (accessed Jan 2013).
No relevant disclosures.