Connect
MJA
MJA

Respecting the role of general practitioners

Aajuli Shukla
Med J Aust 2024; 220 (9): 442-442. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52296
Published online: 20 May 2024

Recently, my partner and I have been trying to relate some of the disciplining that we do as a family with our almost 3‐year‐old child back to respect: for boundaries, for feelings and for our elders. The two of us have also been reflecting on what respect means to us currently within our profession between various specialties.

In this issue of the MJA focusing on general practice, Suetani and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52281) make a compelling case for a drastic change in the way mental health care is organised in Australia which requires a respectful collaboration between specialties. They write that increased funding will not necessarily improve mental health care provision, nor will it be particularly efficient without a greater inclusion of the biopsychosocial model in the way mental health is managed. Most general practitioners are currently shouldering the cost of complex mental health care, especially in socially and economically disadvantaged groups without adequate support or funding. Care is often fragmented and lacks a more holistic approach. They argue that a comprehensive approach with adequate inclusion of non‐mental health care workers to help manage some of the socio‐economic inequities that underscore mental health conditions and improve cohesion between the providers of mental health care is likely to yield better value.

Primary care is an integral part of health care provision in Australia. Despite recent fragmentation of care with an increasing scope for pharmacists to prescribe antibiotics for urinary tract infections and the advent of urgent care centres, GPs continue to be important in the diagnosis and management of acute conditions in undifferentiated patients as well as screening for and managing a comprehensive list of chronic conditions.

In their perspective article, Venning and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52287) acknowledge the difficult work that GPs do in trying to diagnose cancer in an undifferentiated patient. In highlighting the Australian Cancer Plan, unveiled in November 2023, which emphasised a strategic commitment to “maximising cancer prevention and early detection,” they acknowledge that currently “no cancer risk assessment tools are in mainstream use in Australian general practice”. They discuss various prediction tools in use and being trialled in Australia as an exciting addition to assist GPs in their day‐to‐day workflow.

In a research article, Cameron and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52288) examine dysmenorrhea in adolescents, an oft encountered issue in primary care. Using data collected from 1600 adolescents in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), they have shown an incredibly high prevalence of dysmenorrhea in young Australian adolescents that directly correlates to missed days of school and sports or extracurricular activities. An accompanying editorial by Grover and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52290) highlights the need for primary care physicians to recognise and ask about pelvic pain in young female adolescents while also discussing some management strategies. The most important take‐home message seems to be that too many health professionals normalise dysmenorrhea without considering its impact on daily activities.

It has become rare as an editor of the MJA who also works as a GP to see research that focuses on the good that GPs do. Most research manuscripts conclude that primary care physicians need better training in or need better funding to perform an intervention. In this issue, a research letter by Albarqouni and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52285) illustrates the positive effect of GP intervention. They examined data collected by the 2020–21 National Health Survey and specifically looked at questions around consumption of alcohol, smoking and dietary habits. The team found that although a small proportion of respondents received advice regarding unhealthy levels of drinking alcohol, smoking and poor intake of fruits and vegetables, the proportion who changed their behaviours over time were more likely to have received advice from a GP regarding their habits compared with those who did not. It was heartening to see the power that general practice potentially has in changing behaviours that have a direct impact on the development of chronic disease.

As a GP, respect that GPs get from the government feels lacking. The waning respect and renumeration across the profession are reflected in a significant decrease in training numbers of medical graduates choosing primary care as a career.

In their research article, Sturman and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52291) perform a qualitative analysis with various stakeholders at different levels of general practice training to provide insight into this complex problem. They provide four recommendations: increasing medical student and junior doctor placements in general practice, increasing exposure to inspiring GP clinicians and educators, improving trainee pay and entitlements, and improving integration care and interprofessional relationships between hospitals and general practice clinics. Although intuitively these suggestions should go far to address the burnout and exhaustion evident in the primary care workforce, it feels like none of this would work unless primary care in Australia receives the respect it deserves from governing bodies. The participants in this study, most of them GPs, express their ongoing passion for the profession despite the challenges involved. One quote that was particularly poignant was of a participant talking about “saving the profession we love”.

Current workforce projections already talk about a shortfall of GPs with regards to our rapidly ageing population. The problem is that without adequate funding, that comes from respecting the role GPs play in managing chronic disease, most of the solutions for primary care provision seem to focus on fragmenting care to other professionals rather than the resource we have at hand: a group of dedicated, incredibly well educated, and professional doctors that see anyone and everyone walking through their clinic doors.

 

  • Aajuli Shukla1

  • Deputy Medical Editor, Medical Journal of Australia, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: mja@mja.com.au

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.