Pathways and a culture that view blood as disposable must yield to approaches that value patients’ own blood
The often predictable haemostatic challenge of surgery includes the possibility of anaemia increasing procedure‐induced stress and consequently the burden on the patient during the operation and their recuperation. Peri‐operative anaemia has often been managed by transfusion. Blood was regarded as disposable, and the ready supply of donor blood has enabled higher risk invasive procedures in the knowledge that blood can be replaced even in the event of excessive loss. Despite considerable advances in the safety of transfusion, blood remains a biological product with residual risks, including infection and immunological effects. Further, each unnecessarily transfused unit of blood increases the burden on donations.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
I have received funding for my institution from the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Healthcare for the National Patient Blood Management Collaborative.