Treating acute headache begins at home and continues, if necessary, in the emergency department (ED). Drug treatment is heterogenous,1 and understanding the determinants of prescribing could help appropriate medication choices. We therefore assessed the predictors of prescribing in Australian and New Zealand EDs for people with primary headache.
We undertook a secondary analysis of Australian and New Zealand data from the multinational HEAD study ().2 The major outcome was drug administration to people presenting to EDs with primary headache. We assessed the use of paracetamol, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, anti‐dopaminergic agents (prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, droperidol), ondansetron, chlorpromazine (intravenous infusion), and triptans. We included headache characteristics and pre‐hospital medications as fixed effect predictors in a multilevel binary logistic regression model; hospital group was included as a random effect to account for clustering of patients within groups. The analysis was conducted in Stata 16.1. The Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee approved the HEAD study (HREC/43148/MH‐2018), which was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000094178).
A total of 1521 people with primary headache attended the 44 participating EDs (median age, 41 years [interquartile range, 29–55 years]; 1102 women [72%]; 382 transported by ambulance [25%]) (Supporting Information, table 1). Prior to arrival, 600 had self‐medicated with non‐opioid analgesics (39%) and 177 with opioids (codeine, oxycodone, tramadol) (12%). Ambulance staff had provided non‐opioid analgesics to 94 of 382 patients (25%), opioids to 96 (25%; most frequently fentanyl [60, 16%] or morphine [31, 8%]), and anti‐emetics to 139 (36%) (Supporting Information, table 2).
In the EDs, non‐opioid analgesics were administered to 1036 people (68%), opioids to 495 (33%; most frequently oxycodone [224, 15%] or codeine [214, 14%]), anti‐dopaminergic agents to 478 (31%), ondansetron to 321 (21%), chlorpromazine (infused) to 281 (18%), and triptans to 46 patients (3%) (Supporting Information, table 3). Eight treatments accounted for 51% of the 88 drug combinations used in the ED (no drug, 17%; paracetamol alone, 8%; paracetamol/NSAID, 6%; paracetamol/NSAID/anti‐dopaminergic, 5%; paracetamol/NSAID/opioid, paracetamol/opioid, or opioid only, each 4%; paracetamol/anti‐dopaminergic, 3%).
Opioids were more frequently provided in the ED to people with moderate or severe rather than mild headache, those with prolonged headache (duration longer than three days), and people who used an opioid before arriving at the ED (Box). Other drugs were used in combination with an opioid in 464 of 495 cases (94%), but not a guideline‐recommended anti‐migraine medication (anti‐dopaminergic, chlorpromazine, triptan) in 240 of 495 cases (48%). Ondansetron, without proven anti‐migraine effects, was given more frequently than an anti‐dopaminergic to relieve nausea or vomiting (Box).
Chlorpromazine was more frequently provided in the ED to people with severe headache than other drugs (Box); it was administered as a second drug rather than as the initial drug in 160 of 281 cases (57%; , table 3), as part of a stepped care approach. Stratified care, in which initial treatment is based on headache severity and disability, may provide greater headache relief,4 but this has not been confirmed in ED care.
Triptans were given infrequently in the ED, usually to people with a history of migraine (Box), possibly because triptans are regarded as effective only when taken early in headache onset. Subcutaneous sumatriptan, however, is recommended by Australian guidelines for intractable migraine (longer than 72 hours)3 and by the American Headache Society for eligible migraineurs seeking help in the ED.5
Our findings suggest that evidence‐base recommendations are not always followed in the ED, but do not provide information about the most effective treatment options. ED practice changes to better reflect guideline recommendations could include using parenteral prochlorperazine or metoclopramide rather than ondansetron in people with primary headache pain and vomiting,5 improving hospital opioid stewardship to avoid overuse of opioids,6,7 providing subcutaneous triptans to eligible migraineurs,3,5 and considering subcutaneous triptans or intravenous chlorpromazine as initial treatment options for moderate to severe migraine in a stratified care approach.4
Box – Drugs given to people presenting with primary headache to 44 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand: multilevel binary logistic regression analysis (odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals)
Fixed effect predictors |
Paracetamol |
NSAIDs |
Opioids |
Anti‐dopaminergics* |
Chlorpromazine† |
Ondansetron |
Triptans |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Age, per 10 years |
0.98 |
0.79 |
1.00 |
0.88 |
0.94 |
0.90 |
0.93 |
||||||||
Sex (men) |
0.88 |
1.05 |
1.09 |
0.72 |
0.78 |
0.84 |
1.01 |
||||||||
History of migraine |
0.96 |
1.44 |
1.05 |
1.90 |
2.80 |
1.48 |
2.33 |
||||||||
Headache severity, (v mild) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Moderate |
1.95 (1.34–2.82) |
2.32 |
2.09 |
1.34 |
3.59 |
1.28 |
1.57 |
||||||||
Severe |
2.20 |
2.62 |
3.13 |
2.02 |
4.30 |
2.76 |
1.85 |
||||||||
Unknown |
1.29 |
1.73 |
1.66 |
1.73 |
2.30 |
1.58 |
0.89 |
||||||||
Headache duration (v < 1 day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
1–3 days |
1.29 |
1.44 |
1.05 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
1.07 |
1.05 |
||||||||
> 3 days |
1.12 |
0.98 |
1.37 |
1.16 |
1.72 |
0.65 |
1.01 |
||||||||
Unknown |
0.70 |
0.64 |
0.72 |
0.64 |
1.43 |
0.51 |
1.43 |
||||||||
Nausea/vomiting |
1.32 |
1.22 |
1.28 |
2.15 |
2.02 |
4.11 |
1.22 |
||||||||
Pre‐hospital drugs taken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Paracetamol |
0.55 |
1.0 |
1.20 |
0.99 |
1.01 |
0.99 |
0.69 |
||||||||
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug |
0.89 |
0.80 |
1.06 |
1.03 |
1.32 |
0.97 |
1.52 |
||||||||
Opioid |
0.95 |
1.06 |
1.46 |
1.32 |
1.78 |
1.02 |
1.29 |
||||||||
Anti‐emetic |
0.71 |
0.56 |
0.82 |
0.98 |
0.91 |
0.72 |
0.95 |
||||||||
Triptan |
1.20 |
0.94 |
0.76 |
0.98 |
1.74 |
0.88 |
1.16 |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
* Prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, droperidol. † Unlike other anti‐dopaminergic agents, chlorpromazine is not typically used as an anti‐emetic, but given as an intravenous infusion for treating intractable migraine.3 Bold: confidence interval does not include 1.0. |
Received 6 February 2022, accepted 29 June 2022
- 1. Pellatt RAF, Kamona S, Chu K, et al. The Headache in Emergency Departments study: opioid prescribing in patients presenting with headache. A multicenter, cross‐sectional, observational study. Headache 2021; 61: 1387‐1402.
- 2. Kelly AM, Kuan WS, Chu KH, et al; HEAD Study Group. Epidemiology, investigation, management, and outcome of headache in emergency departments (HEAD study): a multinational observational study. Headache 2021; 61: 1539‐1552.
- 3. Therapeutic Guidelines. Headache and facial pain. In: Neurology [published Mar 2021]. https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au/guideLine?guidelinePage=Neurology&frompage=etgcomplete (viewed June 2022).
- 4. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Stone AM, et al; Disability in Strategies of Care Study group. Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study: a randomized trial. JAMA 2000; 284: 2599‐2605.
- 5. Orr SL, Friedman BW, Christie S, et al. Management of adults with acute migraine in the emergency department: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies. Headache 2016; 56: 911‐940.
- 6. Pattullo C, Suckling B, Donovan P, Hall L. Developing a framework for implementing opioid stewardship programs in Australian hospital settings. Intern Med J 2022; 52: 530‐541.
- 7. Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists. Don’t use opioids for the treatment of migraine, except in rare circumstances. Choosing Wisely Australia, 5 Oct 2016. https://www.choosingwisely.org.au/recommendations/anzan4 (viewed June 2022).
Open access
Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley – The University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
We acknowledge the contributions of all members of the HEAD Study Group (Supporting Information).
No relevant disclosures.