Sex differences in the characteristics of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have been described. Women present more frequently than men with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI),1 have atypical symptoms,2 more frequently have non‐obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD),2,3,4 and less frequently receive evidence‐based therapies.1,2
In this study, we assessed differences in the evidence‐based treatment received by men and women with non‐ST‐elevation ACS (NSTEACS) and in their outcomes (in‐hospital and at 6‐month follow‐up). We also separately assessed these differences in patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD).
We analysed Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE)5 registry data for patients diagnosed with NSTEACS (NSTEMI or unstable angina) in 43 Australian hospitals during 23 February 2009 – 16 October 2018. Patients with type 2 myocardial infarction were excluded. The clinical outcomes assessed were receipt of guideline‐based medications and invasive therapies, including cardiac catheterisation and revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]). In‐hospital outcomes were all‐cause deaths and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke), adjusted for age group and comorbid conditions. Procedures and outcomes at the 6‐month follow‐up were assessed by telephone interview. Our study was approved by the Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (CH62/6/2008‐141).
A total of 7783 patients were eligible for our analysis, including 2422 women (31%). Mean age was higher for women than men (67.9 years; standard deviation [SD], 14 years v 65.3 years; SD, 13 years), as was the median GRACE risk score (105.6; interquartile range [IQR], 82–129 v 100.8; IQR, 81–123). The proportion of women who underwent cardiac catheterisation was smaller (1710, 71% v 4134, 77%), and the median time to catheterisation was longer (53 h; IQR, 28–91 h v 47 h; IQR, 25–77 h); NOCAD was detected in a larger proportion of women than men during catheterisation (602, 35% v 566, 14%). At discharge, fewer women were prescribed aspirin (85% v 91%), a second antiplatelet medication (59% v 68%), β‐blockers (71% v 75%), or statins (86% v 92%), or referred to cardiac rehabilitation (54% v 63%) (Box).
A total of 4676 patients had documented CAD, including 1108 women (24%). Smaller proportions of women with CAD than of men underwent CABG (110, 10% v 563, 16%) or were prescribed statins at discharge (94% v 96%) (Supporting Information, table 1). Fewer women than men were referred to cardiac rehabilitation (750, 69% v 2652, 75%), including among those who had been revascularised (CABG: 97, 77% v 509, 83%; PCI: 480, 76% v 1623, 81%).
In multivariable analyses adjusted for hospital clustering and differences in baseline characteristics, adjusted mortality rates in hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–1.46) and at six months (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.60–1.21) were similar for men and women, as were MACE rates in hospital (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78–1.20) and at six months (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75–1.14) (Supporting Information, tables 2–6).
The women with NSTEACS in our study received less evidence‐based treatment, consistent with previous reports.1,3 The larger proportion of women with NOCAD may partly explain the difference. However, NOCAD is not a benign condition, and patients can benefit from secondary prevention therapies.6 In Australia, adherence to guideline‐based therapy for people with NSTEACS could be improved, especially for women in hospital and for both sexes at discharge.
Box – Baseline characteristics and management of 7783 patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes, Australia, 2009–2018, by sex
Variable |
All patients |
Women |
Men |
Difference (percentage points*) (95% CI) |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of patients |
7783 |
2422 [31%] |
5361 [69%] |
|
|||||||||||
Baseline characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Age (years), mean (SD) |
66.1 (13) |
67.9 (14) |
65.3 (13) |
2.7 (2.0–3.3) years |
|||||||||||
GRACE risk score (Fox), median (IQR) |
102.3 (81–125) |
105.6 (82–129) |
100.8 (81–123) |
4.8 (2.9–6.6) points |
|||||||||||
Prior myocardial infarction |
2793 (36%) |
738 (30%) |
2055 (38%) |
–7.9 (–10.1 to –5.6) |
|||||||||||
Prior heart failure |
752 (10%) |
225 (9%) |
527 (10%) |
–0.5 (–1.9 to 0.9) |
|||||||||||
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention |
1957 (25%) |
490 (20%) |
1467 (27%) |
–7.1 (–9.1 to –5.1) |
|||||||||||
Prior coronary artery bypass graft |
1156 (15%) |
239 (10%) |
917 (17%) |
–7.2 (–8.8 to –5.7) |
|||||||||||
Prior atrial fibrillation |
959 (12%) |
331 (14%) |
628 (12%) |
2.0 (0.3 to 3.6) |
|||||||||||
Chronic renal failure |
817 (10%) |
262 (11%) |
555 (10%) |
0.5 (–1 to 2) |
|||||||||||
Prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack |
658 (8%) |
202 (8%) |
456 (9%) |
–0.2 (–1.5 to 1.2) |
|||||||||||
Diabetes |
2438 (31%) |
796 (33%) |
1642 (31%) |
2.2 (0 to 4.5) |
|||||||||||
Hypertension |
5242 (67%) |
1688 (70%) |
3554 (66%) |
3.4 (1.2 to 5.6) |
|||||||||||
Dyslipidaemia |
4783 (62%) |
1430 (59%) |
3353 (63%) |
–3.5 (–5.9 to –1.2) |
|||||||||||
Smoking history (never smoked) |
2931 (38%) |
1264 (52%) |
1667 (31%) |
21.2 (18.9 to 23.5) |
|||||||||||
Peripheral arterial disease |
549 (7%) |
150 (6%) |
399 (7%) |
–1.3 (–2.4 to –0.1) |
|||||||||||
Lung disease |
1048 (13%) |
376 (16%) |
672 (13%) |
3 (1.3 to 4.7) |
|||||||||||
Killip class |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
1 |
6836 (88%) |
2098 (87%) |
4738 (88%) |
–1.8 (–3.4 to –0.1) |
|||||||||||
2 |
759 (10%) |
251 (10%) |
508 (9%) |
0.9 (–0.6 to 2.4) |
|||||||||||
3 |
159 (2%) |
65 (3%) |
94 (2%) |
0.9 (0.2 to 1.7) |
|||||||||||
4 |
29 (< 1%) |
8 (< 1%) |
21 (< 1%) |
–0.1 (–0.4 to 0.3) |
|||||||||||
Cardiac arrest on admission |
127 (2%) |
26 (1%) |
101 (2%) |
–0.8 (–1.4 to –0.3) |
|||||||||||
Diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NSTEMI |
5641 (72%) |
1751 (72%) |
3890 (73%) |
–0.3 (–2.4 to 1.9) |
|||||||||||
Unstable angina |
2142 (28%) |
671 (28%) |
1471 (27%) |
0.3 (–1.9 to 2.4) |
|||||||||||
In‐hospital management |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Aspirin |
7373 (95%) |
2275 (94%) |
5098 (95%) |
–1.2 (–2.3 to –0.1) |
|||||||||||
Second antiplatelet† † |
6650 (85%) |
2027 (84%) |
4623 (86%) |
–2.5 (–4.3 to –0.8) |
|||||||||||
Heparin/low molecular weight heparin |
6550 (84%) |
2009 (83%) |
4541 (85%) |
–1.8 (–3.5 to 0.0) |
|||||||||||
Cardiac catheterisation |
5844 (75%) |
1710 (71%) |
4134 (77%) |
–6.5 (–8.6 to –4.4) |
|||||||||||
Admission to catheterisation time (h), median (IQR) |
48.8 (26–82) |
53.0 (28–91) |
47.2 (25–77) |
5.8 (2.3–9.2) hours |
|||||||||||
Vessels with ≥ 50% stenosis (catheterisation) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
None |
1168 (20%) |
602 (35%) |
566 (14%) |
21.5 (19 to 24) |
|||||||||||
One |
1960 (34%) |
564 (33%) |
1396 (34%) |
–0.8 (–3.5 to 1.9) |
|||||||||||
Two |
1348 (23%) |
293 (17%) |
1055 (26%) |
–8.4 (–10.7 to –6.1) |
|||||||||||
More than two |
1368 (23%) |
251 (15%) |
1117 (27%) |
–12.3 (–14.5 to –10.1) |
|||||||||||
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) |
2653 (34%) |
637 (26%) |
2016 (38%) |
–11.3 (–13.5 to –9.1) |
|||||||||||
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) |
758 (10%) |
133 (5%) |
625 (12%) |
–6.2 (–7.4 to –4.9) |
|||||||||||
Discharge medications and rehabilitation ‡ |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Aspirin |
6748/7580 (89%) |
2007/2355 (85%) |
4741/5225 (91%) |
–5.5 (–7.2 to –3.9) |
|||||||||||
Second antiplatelet† † |
4955/7580 (65%) |
1399/2355 (59%) |
3556/5225 (68%) |
–8.7 (–11.0 to –6.3) |
|||||||||||
β‐Blocker |
5597/7580 (74%) |
1664/2355 (71%) |
3933/5225 (75%) |
–4.6 (–6.8 to –2.4) |
|||||||||||
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker |
5256/7580 (69%) |
1600/2355 (68%) |
3656/5225 (70%) |
–2.0 (–4.3 to –0.2) |
|||||||||||
Statin/lipid‐lowering therapy |
6849/7580 (90%) |
2024/2355 (86%) |
4825/5225 (92%) |
–6.4 (–8.0 to –4.8) |
|||||||||||
Referral to cardiac rehabilitation |
4564/7580 (60%) |
1263/2355 (54%) |
3301/5225 (63%) |
–9.6 (–12.0 to –7.2) |
|||||||||||
Patients who underwent PCI |
2103/2638 (80%) |
480/631 (76%) |
1623/2007 (81%) |
–4.8 (–8.5 to –1.1) |
|||||||||||
Patients who underwent CABG |
606/739 (82%) |
97/126 (77%) |
509/613 (83%) |
–6.1 (–14.0 to 1.9) |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
CI = confidence interval; GRACE = Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; IQR = interquartile range; NSTEMI = non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction; SD, standard deviation. * Unless otherwise indicated. † Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel. ‡ The denominators are the numbers of patients discharged from hospital alive. |
Received 14 October 2020, accepted 6 May 2021
- 1. Alabas OA, Gale CP, Hall M, et al. Sex differences in treatments, relative survival, and excess mortality following acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the SWEDEHEART registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e007123.
- 2. Dey S, Flather MD, Devlin G, et al; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events investigators. Sex‐related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart 2009; 95: 20–26.
- 3. Alfredsson J, Lindbäck J, Wallentin L, Swahn E. Similar outcome with an invasive strategy in men and women with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes: from the Swedish Web‐System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence‐Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 3128–3136.
- 4. Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2009; 302: 874–882.
- 5. Aliprandi‐Costa B, Ranasinghe I, Turnbull F, et al. The design and rationale of the Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE). Heart Lung Circ 2013; 22: 533–541.
- 6. Lindahl B, Baron T, Erlinge D, et al. Medical therapy for secondary prevention and long‐term outcome in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 2017; 135: 1481–1489.
Karice Hyun is supported by a National Heart Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (102138). The CONCORDANCE registry has been funded by grants to the Sydney Local Health District from Sanofi Aventis, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Merck Sharp and Dohme/Schering‐Plough joint venture, and the National Heart Foundation of Australia.
No relevant disclosures.