In reply: We thank Chung and Haran for their interest in our article. We acknowledge some of the limitations they present and, in fact, did mention them in our publication.1 These include limitations inherent to registry‐based studies such as the lack of access to the precise reasons for decision making and the unmeasured confounders including psychological issues, frailty and complications among others. We believe that concerns in regards to housing and home hazards, which may be present at discharge and lead to an inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) admission, should not affect longer term outcomes at 12 months.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Kimmel LA, Simpson PM, Holland AE, et al. Discharge destination and patient‐reported outcomes after inpatient treatment for isolated lower limb fractures. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 263–270. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/6/discharge-destination-and-patient-reported-outcomes-after-inpatient-treatment
- 2. Kasza J, Wolfe R, Schuster T. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 1303–1311.
The Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) is funded by the Transport Accident Commission. Authors of this letter respond on behalf of all co‐authors of the original publication.
No relevant disclosures.