Demographics and performance of candidates in the examinations of the Australian Medical Council, 1978–2019

Yeomans, Neville D; Sewell, Jillian R; Pigou, Philip; Macintyre, Stuart

doi:10.5694/mja2.50800

Topics

Australia has relied, for most of its history, on international medical graduates (IMGs) to supplement its workforce. Since 1978, IMGs applying for general registration to practise in Australia have usually needed to pass the examinations of the Australian Medical Examining Council, or since 1986, its successor, the Australian Medical Council (AMC). The AMC provides several pathways to registration by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). The route now termed “the standard pathway” consists of a two‐part assessment including a multiple choice question (MCQ) examination followed by a clinical examination. While most IMGs are required to pass both examinations, since 2007, IMGs who qualified in the so‐called competent authority countries (the United Kingdom, Ireland, the United States and Canada) have usually not been required to sit these examinations.1

1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
2 Centre for Community Child Health, Melbourne, VIC
3 Australian Medical Council, Canberra, ACT

Correspondence: nyeomans@unimelb.edu.au

Acknowledgements:

We acknowledge the assistance of Kevin Ng and Prathyusha Sama, Senior Computer Programmer and Software Developer at the AMC, for programming to extract the de‐identified data analysed in this article.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

1. Medical Board of Australia. Competent authority pathway [website]. AHPRA, 2019. https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Registration/International-Medical-Graduates/Competent-Authority-Pathway.aspx (viewed July 2020).
2. Australian Government Publishing Service. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission — annual report 1990–91. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1991. https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/Annual_Report_90-91.pdf (viewed July 2020).
3. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and Australian Health Workforce Officials’ Committee. Review of Australian specialist medical colleges: report to Australian Health Ministers. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2005.
4. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing. Lost in the labyrinth: report on the inquiry into registration processes and support for overseas trained doctors. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=haa/overseasdoctors/report.htm (viewed July 2020).
5. Geffen L. Assuring medical standards: the Australian Medical Council 1985–2010. Canberra, ACT: Australian Medical Council, 2010.
6. Australian Medical Council Limited. IMG guides. https://www.amc.org.au/publications/img-guides/ (viewed July 2020).
7. United Nations Statistics Division. Geographical regions 1999. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49 (viewed July 2020).
8. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Migration, Australia, 1993–2018 [Cat. No. 3412.0]. Canberra, ACT: ABS, 2018. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3412.02017-18?OpenDocument (viewed July 2020).
9. Breen K, Frank I, Walters T. Australian Medical Council: a view from the inside. Intern Med J 2001; 31: 243–248.
10. McCoubrie P. Improving the fairness of multiple‐choice questions: a literature review. Med Teach 2004; 26: 709–712.
11. Yeomans ND. They came to heal: Australia's medical immigrants, 1960 to the present [dissertation]. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2018: 120.
12. Dewhurst NG, McManus C, Mollon J, et al. Performance in the MRCP (UK) examination 2003–4: analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self‐declared ethnicity and gender. BMC Med 2007; 5: 8.
13. Shellito JL, Osland JS, Helmer SD, Chang FC. American Board of Surgery examinations: can we identify surgery residency applicants and residents who will pass the examinations on the first attempt? Am J Surg 2010; 199: 216–222.
14. Rubright JD, Jodoin M, Barone MA. Examining demographics, prior academic performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination scores. Acad Med 2019; 94: 364–370.
15. Unwin E, Potts HWW, Dacre J, et al. Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross‐sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18: 1–9.
16. Sandhu H, Adams A, Singleton L, et al. The impact of gender dyads on doctor–patient communication: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 76: 348–355.
17. Menzies L, Minson S, Brightwell A, et al. An evaluation of demographic factors affecting performance in a paediatric membership multiple‐choice examination. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91: 72–76.
18. Lipner R, Song H, Biester T, et al. Factors that influence general internists’ and surgeons’ performance on maintenance of certification exams. Acad Med 2011; 86: 53–58.
19. McGrail MR, Russell DJ. Australia's rural medical workforce: supply from its medical schools against career stage, gender and rural‐origin. Aust J Rural Health 2016; 25: 298–305.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.