Telehealth can be used to deliver clinical trials, improve access to novel therapies and develop clinical networks
Australia is a vast country. Nearly 32% of Australians reside outside the major capital cities, while 95% of medical specialists practise in cities.1 People living in rural and regional areas consistently experience poorer health outcomes.2
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4102.0 ‐ Australian Social Trends, April 2013. The ‘average’ Australian. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features30April+2013 (viewed July 2020).
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2018 (Australia's Health Series No. 16; Cat No. AUS 221). Canberra: AIHW, 2018. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7c42913d-295f-4bc9-9c24-4e44eff4a04a/aihw-aus-221.pdf.aspx?inline=true (viewed July 2020).
- 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2019 (Cancer Series No. 119). Canberra: AIHW; 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/8c9fcf52-0055-41a0-96d9-f81b0feb98cf/aihw-can-123.pdf.aspx?inline=true (viewed July 2020).
- 4. Fox P, Boyce A. Cancer health inequality persists in regional and remote Australia. Med J Aust 2014; 201: 445–446. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2014/201/8/cancer-health-inequality-persists-regional-and-remote-australia
- 5. Coory MD, Ho T, Jordan SJ. Australia is continuing to make progress against cancer, but the regional and remote disadvantage remains. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 605–608. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/199/9/australia-continuing-make-progress-against-cancer-regional-and-remote
- 6. Grimison P, Phillips F, Butow P, et al. Are visiting oncologists enough? A qualitative study of the needs of Australian rural and regional cancer patients, carers and health professionals. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2013; 9: 226–238.
- 7. Francis HM, Clarke KA, Steer CB, et al. Attitudes of advanced Australian medical oncology trainees to rural practice. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2008; 4: 34–41.
- 8. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population‐based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 730–756.
- 9. Murphy C, Sabesan S, Steer C, et al. Oncology service initiatives and research in regional Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2015; 23: 40–48.
- 10. Sabesan S, Zalcberg J. Telehealth models could be extended to conducting clinical trials—a teletrial approach. Eur J Cancer Care 2018; 27: e12587.
- 11. Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, et al. The role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35: 185–198.
- 12. Sabesan S, Zalcberg J. Telehealth. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 402.
- 13. Sabesan S, Zalcberg J, Underhill C, et al. Implementation of the Australasian Teletrial Model: lessons from practice. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2019; 15 (Suppl 8): 3–14.
- 14. Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Decentralized clinical trials. https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/projects/decentralized-clinical-trials (viewed July 2020).
- 15. Unger JM, Vaidya R, Hershman DL, et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the magnitude of structural, clinical, and physician and patient barriers to cancer clinical trial participation. J Nat Cancer Inst 2019; 111: 245–255.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
We acknowledge the input of Hannah Cross, Alana Donaldson, Dish Herath, Kathleen Wilkins, Paul Baden and Sabe Sabesan in the development and implementation of the teletrials framework.
No relevant disclosures.