To the editor: Ioannidis and Boyack discussed misuse of and gaming mechanisms for citation metrics in the publication records of scientists.1 Studies have suggested some other limitations regarding citation‐based bibliometric indices in the evaluation of articles2 or journals.3 A recent study showed the confounding effect of highly cited items on impact factor calculation.3 Previously, we measured a considerable effect for a series of highly cited articles affiliated with the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluations (IHME; University of Washington, Seattle) on the impact factor of The Lancet.4 Here, we evaluate the impact of these articles on the researchers’ quantitative bibliometric indices.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Ioannidis JPA, Boyack KW. Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 247–249. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/6/citation-metrics-appraising-scientists-misuse-gaming-and-proper-use
- 2. Aroeira RI, M ARBC. Can citation metrics predict the true impact of scientific papers? FEBS J 2020; 287: 2440–2448.
- 3. Lei L, Sun Y. Should highly cited items be excluded in impact factor calculation? The effect of review articles on journal impact factor. Scientometrics 2020; 122: 1697–1706.
- 4. Rezaee‐Zavareh MS, Karimi‐Sari H. Effect of published papers by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation on the impact factor of The Lancet journal. J Investig Med 2020; 68: 1203–1204
Hamidreza Karimi‐Sari has participated in IHME‐affiliated articles as a collaborator.