Differences between general practice and hospital settings have ethical and legal implications for teachers and learners
The general practice setting provides a learning environment that creates a unique ethical and legal milieu for the general practitioner, the patient and the student. It is a less formal, more intimate and less anonymous setting than the hospital environment, and GPs often have long‐established relationships with patients and detailed knowledge of their circumstances. As a community‐centred enterprise, social connections between patients, their families, practice staff and the GP, and sometimes also students, may foster unintended breaches of confidentiality and a vulnerability to boundary crossings.1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Sturman N. Teaching medical students: ethical challenges. Aust Fam Physician 2011; 40: 992–995.
- 2. Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME guide No. 32. Med Teach 2015; 37: 611–630.
- 3. Freund T, Lekutat J, Schwantes U, Lekutat C. Z Allg Med 2008; 84: 109–115.
- 4. Park SE, Allfrey C, Jones MM, et al. Patient participation in general practice based undergraduate teaching: a focus group study of patient perspectives. Br J Gen Pract 2017; 67: e260–e266.
- 5. Breen KJ, McCordner SM, Thomson CJH. Good medical practice: professionalism, ethics and law; 4th ed. Canberra: Australian Medical Council, 2016.
- 6. Tran PD, Laurence JM, Weston KM, McLennan PL. The effect of parallel consulting on the quality of consultations in regional general practice. Educ Prim Care 2012; 23: 153–157.
- 7. McLean M. Muslim women and medical students in the clinical encounter. Med Educ 2010; 44: 306–315.
- 8. O'Flynn N, Rymer J. Women's attitudes to the sex of medical students in a gynaecology clinic: cross‐sectional survey. Br Med J 2002; 325: 683–684.
- 9. Monnickendam SM, VInker S, Zalewski S, et al. Patients’ attitudes towards the presence of medical students in family practice consultations. Isr Med Assoc J 2001; 3: 903–906.
- 10. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for the supervision of medical students in general practice. Melbourne: RACGP, 2007. https://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Educators/RACGP-Guidelines-for-the-Supervision-of-Medical-Students-in-General-Practice.pdf (viewed Feb 2020).
- 11. Kerridge I, Lowe M, Stewart C. The student in the health‐care environment. In: Kerridge I, Lowe M, Stewart C editors. Ethics and law for the health professions; 4th ed. Sydney: Federation Press, 2013: 236–250.
- 12. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Medical student involvement in patient care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2001. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/medical-student-involvement-patient-care-report-council-ethical-and-judicial-affairs/2001-03 (viewed Feb 2020).
- 13. Satterwhite R, Satterwhite W, Enarson C. An ethical paradox: the effect of unethical conduct on medical students’ values. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 462–465.
- 14. Chipp E, Stoneley S, Cooper K. Clinical placements for medical students: factors affecting patients’ involvement in medical education. Med Teach 2004; 26: 114–119.
- 15. Sturman N, Farley R, Jennings W. Exploring medical student experiences of ethical issues and professionalism in Australian general practice. PBLH 2014; 2: 88–95.
- 16. Waldman RA, Waldman SD, Carter B. When I say … moral distress as a teaching point. Med Educ 2019; 53: 430–431.
We thank Georgie Haysom (Head of Advocacy, Avant Mutual) and Catherine Hughes (Communications Manager, Advocacy Avant Mutual) for their review of the manuscript and their revision suggestions.
No relevant disclosures.