A well designed National Integrated Health Services Information Analysis Asset will improve services and policy
New Zealand continues to set best practice standards internationally for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction and management. A 2018 study, using data from the PREDICT general practice cohort linked with demographic, prior medical history and drug‐dispensing data highlighted that the risk of CVD is best estimated from longitudinal follow‐up of a contemporary nationally representative cohort initially free of disease.1 PREDICT is a risk tool that incorporates new predictors of socio‐economic deprivation and ethnicity and better reflects the population whose risk is being assessed. In comparison, the application of earlier international risk equations to Australasian populations, such as the Pooled Cohort Risk Equations (PCEs)2 in the United States and QRISK in the United Kingdom,3 are likely to substantially underestimate or overestimate risk, leading to either undertreatment or overtreatment. Where underestimates of risk occur, the individual is falsely reassured and no indication to commence preventive treatment is apparent. The reverse is true for overestimates of risk, where an indication to start preventive treatment is unnecessary. This is particularly true among socially disadvantaged and ethnically diverse populations, where both PCEs and QRISK underperform. New Zealand's ability to integrate its administrative health datasets with other data sources — in this case, primary care — has enabled the conduct of this policy changing research. The New Zealand's Ministry of Health has adopted and supported the roll‐out of the updated CVD risk management guidelines recommending that general practitioners use the new PREDICT‐derived CVD risk equation. It is thus important that Australia has a national repository that enables the combination of routine health datasets with other data sources, existing and emerging, to permit evaluation of health care and inform policy decisions.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Pylypchuk R, Wells S, Kerr A, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction equations in 400 000 primary care patients in New Zealand: a derivation and validation study. Lancet 2018; 391: 1897–1907.
- 2. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, et al. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations. JAMA 2014; 311: 1406–1415.
- 3. Hippisley‐Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2017; 357: j2099.
- 4. Hargreaves J. Hospitals, Resourcing and Classifications Group; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia and New Zealand School of Government, 2018. https://www.anzsog.edu.au/preview-documents/publications-and-brochures/5246-btds-stream-session-1-2/file (viewed Nov 2018).
- 5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Approved AIHW linkage projects. Projects approved by the Ethics Committee [website]. AIHW, 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/our-services/data-linkage/approved-aihw-linkage-projects (viewed July 2019).
- 6. Office for National Statistics. The “five safes” — data privacy at ONS [website]. UK: ONS, 2017. https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2017/01/27/the-five-safes-data-privacy-at-ons (viewed Nov 2018).
No relevant disclosures.