Many questions need to be discussed before 3D‐mammography is adopted for standard screening
In this issue of the MJA, Houssami and colleagues report the first prospective trial of breast tomosynthesis screening in the Australian BreastScreen program. They found that tomosynthesis has a higher cancer detection rate (CDR) than standard mammography; the trade‐offs were a higher recall rate, higher radiation dose, and longer reading time.1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
No relevant disclosures.