Personal contact is crucial for encouraging patients to participate
Starting recruitment is an important milestone in the life cycle of a randomised clinical trial. It often marks the end of months or even years of planning, and is an exciting time for the investigators. However, despite the best planning, recruitment for clinical trials is never easy, and can be difficult for a multitude of reasons. Some relate to the trial itself; the inclusion and exclusion criteria, although intellectually robust, may prevent any patients from ever being eligible. Recruitment may be difficult because of trouble accessing the required types of patients; if the trial is inadequately funded, investigators may be unwilling to recruit participants, or they may be inexperienced regarding the intervention or the population being investigated. Patient‐related factors also determine participation rates: do the patients understand the research question and protocol, is it onerous for them, what are the perceived risks? All of these factors work in a complex interplay to determine the success of trial recruitment strategies.1,2,3
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Watson JM, Torgerson DJ. Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 19; 6: 34.
- 2. Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, et al. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000496.
- 3. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, et al. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 1143–1156.
- 4. Peel R, Ren S, Hure A, et al. Evaluating recruitment strategies for AUSPICE, a large Australian community‐based randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2019; 210: 409–415.
- 5. Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med 2016 Aug 4; 375: 454–463.
- 6. Denhoff ER, Milliren CE, de Ferranti SD, et al. Factors associated with clinical research recruitment in a pediatric academic medical center; a web‐based survey. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0140768.
- 7. Kost RG, Lee LM, Yessis J, et al. Assessing participant‐centered outcomes to improve clinical research. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2179–2181.
- 8. Felsen CB, Shaw EK, Ferrante JM, et al. Strategies for in‐person recruitment: lessons learned from a New Jersey primary care research network (NJPCRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 523–333.
- 9. Saldaña SN, Hooper DK, Froehlich TE, et al. Characteristics of successful recruitment in prospective pediatric pharmacogenetic studies. Clin Ther 2011; 33: 2072–2081.
No relevant disclosures.