Rapid access cardiology services may safely divert people with non‐cardiac chest pain from being admitted to hospital
Chest pain is an exceedingly common cause of presentations to emergency departments, and a large and increasing number of people with suspected cardiac chest pain are being admitted to Australian hospitals (Box). Between 1993–94 and 2007–08, the age‐standardised rate of hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction increased by 80% and that of unstable angina by 33%, but hospitalisations for chest pain increased by more than 200%.1 Only about one in ten people who present to Australian hospitals with suspected cardiac chest pain receive a final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, and no more than 2% of patients with low to intermediate risk of cardiovascular disease are diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome.2 This raises the question of whether such patients need to be admitted to hospital at all.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Monitoring acute coronary syndrome using national hospital data: an information paper on trends and issues (Cat No CVD 57). Canberra: AIHW, 2011.
- 2. Cullen L, Greenslade J, Merollini K, et al. Cost and outcomes of assessing patients with chest pain in an Australian emergency department. Med J Aust 2015; 202: 427–432. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2015/202/8/cost-and-outcomes-assessing-patients-chest-pain-australian-emergency-department
- 3. Department of Health and Social Care (UK). The national service framework for coronary heart disease. Mar 2000. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/198931/National_Service_Framework_for_Coronary_Heart_Disease.pdf (viewed Mar 2019).
- 4. Klimis H, Thiagalingam A, Altman M, et al. Rapid‐access cardiology services: can these reduce the burden of acute chest pain on Australian and New Zealand health services? Intern Med J 2016; 47: 986–991.
- 5. Lee AJ, Michail M, Quaderi SA, et al. Implementation of NICE Clinical Guideline 95 for assessment of stable chest pain in a rapid access chest pain clinic reduces the mean number of investigations and cost per patient. Open Heart 2015; 2: e000151.
- 6. Rajpura A, Sethi S, Taylor M. An evaluation of two Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics in central Lancashire, UK. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13: 326–336.
- 7. Aroney CN, Dunlevie HL, Bett JH. Use of an accelerated chest pain assessment protocol in patients at intermediate risk of adverse cardiac events. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 370–374. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2003/178/8/use-accelerated-chest-pain-assessment-protocol-patients-intermediate-risk
- 8. Sekhri N, Feder GS, Junghans C, et al. How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non‐cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients. Heart 2007; 93: 458–463.
- 9. Yu C, Sheriff J, Ng A, et al. A rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC): initial Australian experience. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 1376–1380.
- 10. Klimis H, Khan ME, Thiagalingam A, et al. Rapid access cardiology (RAC) services within a large tertiary referral centre: first year in review. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 1381–1387.
- 11. Black JA, Cheng K, Flood JA, et al. Evaluating the benefits of a rapid access chest pain clinic in Australia. Med J Aust 2019; 210: 321–325.
No relevant disclosures.