A certification process by an independent agency would help tackle the threat of predatory journals
The past two decades have seen many changes in scholarly publishing — something that has largely been the result of the advent of the internet and its growing influence on our lives. In an effort to adapt to this new age of technology, many journals have developed online editions and some journals have even switched over entirely to online editions. A step beyond this has been the implementation of open access journal publication, which continues to become more commonplace within current publishing practices.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Haug C. The downside of open-access publishing. N Engl J Med 2013; 368; 791-793.
- 2. Butler D. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature 2013; 495: 433-435.
- 3. Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med 2017; 15: 28.
- 4. Bowman JD. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Am J Pharm Educ 2014; 78; 176.
- 5. Shen C, Björk BC. “Predatory” open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 2015; 13: 230.
- 6. Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ 2015; 350: h210.
- 7. Manca A, Cugusi L, Dvir Z, Deriu F. PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion. Lancet 2017; 390: 734-735.
- 8. Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, et al. The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology. Neuroscience 2017; 353: 166-173.
- 9. Beall, J. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98: 77-79.
- 10. Anderson R. Cabell’s new predatory journal blacklist: a review. The Scholarly Kitchen 2017; 25 July. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/07/25/cabells-new-predatory-journal-blacklist-review (viewed Aug 2017).
- 11. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 2013; 342: 60-65.
No relevant disclosures.