Choosing the right statistical test or model can be baffling for researchers, and if it is not conducted correctly, the results from statistical analyses can be misleading. This article covers some common medical research designs, ranging from simple to more complicated, and provides an outline of which statistical test to apply in each instance. In these contexts, data are collected from a sample that is assumed to be representative of a wider population, and the conclusions drawn from the analyses apply to the wider population.1
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Jones MP, Attia JR. Sampling: how you choose people is as important as how you analyse their data. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 67-68. <MJA full text>
- 2. Lindsey JK, Lambert P. On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials. Stat Med 1998; 17: 447-469.
- 3. Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 467-474.
- 4. Cnaan A, Laird N, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med 1997; 16: 2349-2380.
- 5. Goldstein H. Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika 1986; 73: 43-56.
- 6. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size — or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4: 279-282.
- 7. Dobson AJ, Barnett A. An introduction to generalized linear models; 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008.
Series Editors
John R Attia
Michael P Jones
No relevant disclosures.