Emanuel1 enjoins readers to focus on the data concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and to aim at improving the care of dying patients, but advances straw arguments on the basis of three claims in the end-of-life debates that are disputed by neither advocates nor opponents of assisted dying.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Emanuel E. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: focus on the data. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 339-340. <MJA full text>
- 2. Cartwright C. FactCheck Q&A: do 80% of Australians and up to 70% of Catholics and Anglicans support euthanasia laws? The Conversation 2017; 1 May. https://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-do-80-of-australians-and-up-to-70-of-catholics-and-anglicans-support-euthanasia-laws-76079 (accessed Sept 2017).
- 3. Rich B. Pathologizing suffering and the pursuit of a peaceful death. Camb Q Health Ethics 2014; 23: 403-416.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
No relevant disclosures.