Connect
MJA
MJA

Physical comorbidities of post-traumatic stress disorder in Australian Vietnam War veterans

Sarah C McLeay, Wendy M Harvey, Madeline NM Romaniuk, Darrell HG Crawford, David M Colquhoun, Ross McD Young, Miriam Dwyer, John M Gibson, Robyn A O'Sullivan, Graham Cooksley, Christopher R Strakosch, Rachel M Thomson, Joanne Voisey and Bruce R Lawford
Med J Aust 2017; 206 (6): 251-257. || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00935
Published online: 3 April 2017

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the prevalence of physical comorbidities in Australian Vietnam War veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is higher than in trauma-exposed veterans without PTSD.

Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional analysis of the health status (based on self-reported and objective clinical assessments) of 298 Australian Vietnam War veterans enrolled by the Gallipoli Medical Research Institute (Brisbane) during February 2014 – July 2015, of whom 108 were confirmed as having had PTSD and 106 served as trauma-exposed control participants.

Main outcomes and measures: Diagnostic psychiatric interview and psychological assessments determined PTSD status, trauma exposure, and comorbid psychological symptoms. Demographic data, and medical and sleep history were collected; comprehensive clinical examination, electrocardiography, spirometry, liver transient elastography, and selected pathology assessments and diagnostic imaging were performed. Outcomes associated with PTSD were identified; regression analysis excluded the effects of potentially confounding demographic and risk factors and comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Results: The mean total number of comorbidities was higher among those with PTSD (17.7; SD, 6.1) than in trauma-exposed controls (14.1; SD, 5.2; P < 0.001). For 24 of 171 assessed clinical outcomes, morbidity was greater in the PTSD group, including for conditions of the gastrointestinal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, sleep disorders, and laboratory pathology measures. In regression analyses including demographic factors, PTSD remained positively associated with 17 adverse outcomes; after adjusting for the severity of depressive symptoms, it remained significantly associated with ten.

Conclusion: PTSD in Australian Vietnam veterans is associated with comorbidities in several organ systems, independent of trauma exposure. A comprehensive approach to the health care of veterans with PTSD is needed.

 

The known Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with poor physical health, but few analyses of the relationship have been controlled for trauma exposure. 

The new This is the first study to find that several comorbidities are associated with PTSD in older veterans by comparing the veterans with a trauma-exposed control group. These associations remained after adjusting for potential confounding factors. 

The implications PTSD should be viewed as a systemic disorder rather than a purely psychological disorder. Integrated health care strategies for improving psychological and physical health, as well as controlling risk factors, could improve the quality of life and survival of patients. 

 

 

 

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a disabling mental health condition that can develop following exposure to a traumatic event. People with PTSD experience a range of psychological symptoms, including intrusive memories, significant changes in cognition, mood, arousal and reactivity, as well as persistent avoidance of reminders of the traumatic event. The disorder can compromise personal behaviour, including the ability to maintain employment, relationships, and general self-care.

PTSD is common among combat veterans. Investigation of Australian veterans of the Vietnam War has found a lifetime prevalence of 20.9%,1 similar to the estimated prevalence of war-zone PTSD among United States Vietnam War veterans of 17.0%.2 The prevalence of PTSD among Australians who served in Iraq or Afghanistan is 16.5%,3 and the 12-month prevalence among veterans of Australian peacekeeping missions is as high as 16.8%.4

In addition to significant psychological effects, PTSD is associated with considerable physical comorbidity.5-7 Veterans with PTSD are more likely to suffer from physical illness and chronic disease than the general population or veterans without PTSD.5,7 Specifically, PTSD has been associated with gastrointestinal disease,7 respiratory disease,8 musculoskeletal, renal and autoimmune diseases,9 and with cardiovascular disease (CVD); veterans with PTSD have a higher prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) and increased CVD mortality.10 PTSD is also associated with sleep disturbances, with nightmares and insomnia being common. More recently, an increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) was also reported.11 Responses to chronic stress in PTSD, such as increased substance misuse, poor diet and inactivity, have the potential to further harm health.12

Many studies investigating the impact of PTSD on health have examined the prevalence of certain disorders in people with PTSD. However, most have relied on self-reported data, and have not applied a clear definition of trauma exposure in their control groups, making it unclear whether the measured health effects were associated with PTSD or with trauma. We therefore compared self-reported and objective clinical health data for a group of Australian Vietnam War veterans with PTSD and a control group of veterans exposed to trauma but not suffering PTSD.

Methods

Participants

Male veterans who had served in the Australian or New Zealand armed services in Vietnam during the Vietnam War were recruited between February 2014 and July 2015 by a specialised veteran mental health unit at Greenslopes Private Hospital in Brisbane through the Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation and Returned and Services League of Australia (RSL) websites, through RSL publications and newspaper and television advertisements, and by word of mouth. Written informed consent was obtained from participants in advance. Enrolment was stratified by likely PTSD diagnosis. The study was conducted at the Gallipoli Medical Research Institute.

Data collection, management and quality assurance

Participants were assessed by a psychiatrist experienced in diagnosing and treating veterans with PTSD; they were classified as ever having had PTSD (currently or in the past) or not. Participants also underwent assessment by a psychologist using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A structured comprehensive medical history was obtained and a clinical examination conducted by a medical officer. Sleep information was obtained with structured questionnaires, the Berlin Questionnaire for assessing risk of OSA, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). A brief description of all validated questionnaires is provided in the online Appendix 1, table 1.

Electrocardiography (ECG), respiratory function tests, liver transient elastography, fasting abdominal ultrasonography, and computed tomography for coronary artery calcium (CAC) were conducted, and fasting blood pathology assessed.

All data were entered and stored in a Microsoft Excel database. Data quality was ensured by routine database checks and a random chart audit.

Statistical analysis

Outcomes statistically associated with PTSD status were identified, followed by regression analysis of outcomes associated with PTSD to exclude the effects of confounding variables and to evaluate the association of depression or anxiety symptoms with outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary data outcomes, and continuous data were compared in unpaired Student’s t tests. For variables directly related to medication use (blood pressure, serum lipid levels, glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], serum glucose and testosterone levels; online Appendix 1, table 2), the statistical significance of a PTSD diagnosis as a predictor independent of medication was assessed by multiple linear regression, with relevant drug use as a fixed binary predictor (yes v no). Categorical data (CAC score strata) were compared in a Fisher exact test. Medical conditions that were not presented by any participants were excluded from analysis. All tests were two-tailed; to correct for multiple testing at this top-level comparison, statistical significance levels were adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.13

Two regression models were then developed. Model 1 used forward/backward stepwise regression, with seven potential confounders (age, body mass index [BMI], smoking pack-year history, AUDIT score, marital status, employment status, highest education level) and PTSD diagnosis offered into the model in an additive manner to test whether these factors accounted for the association between the PTSD diagnosis and individual comorbidities. Model 2 included the same set of confounders and the PTSD diagnosis, as well as DASS-21 depression and anxiety scores, to test whether symptoms of depression or anxiety accounted for the association between the PTSD diagnosis and individual comorbidities.

All analyses were performed in R 3.1.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the Greenslopes Research and Ethics Committee (reference, 13/53), the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (reference, 014/002), the University of Queensland (reference, 2014000174), and the Queensland University of Technology (reference, 9339361).

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 311 participants were enrolled, of whom 298 underwent all assessments (Box 1). Of these, 108 were confirmed by both psychiatric interview and CAPS-5 evaluation as having or having had PTSD, while 106 trauma-exposed controls had not, according to both measures. Participants who did not meet DSM-5 criteria for trauma exposure were excluded, as were those for whom the psychiatrist and CAPS-5 diagnoses were discordant.

The participants ranged in age from 60 to 88 years, with no significant difference between the two groups. Nor was there a significant difference in their mean weight, but mean BMI was significantly higher in the PTSD group, although the difference was small (control group, 29.0 kg/m2; PTSD group, 30.3 kg/m2; P = 0.037). More participants with PTSD had smoked recently and the group had a higher mean pack-year history. Fewer in this group currently consumed alcohol; total AUDIT scores were not significantly different, but more participants with PTSD were categorised as drinking at a risky or hazardous level or higher, indicating possible alcohol dependence. Fewer participants with PTSD were still in full-time work or had completed a university degree (Box 2).

Clinical outcomes

Direct comparison

The prevalence rates of 16 of 88 adverse outcomes were significantly higher among participants with PTSD, while the prevalence of one (history of squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma) was lower. There were no significant differences in the reported histories of disorders affecting the endocrine or immune systems, the kidneys, or the eyes (Box 3, A; online Appendix 2, A). Participants with PTSD had a significantly higher mean number of comorbidities than those without (17.7 [SD, 6.1] v 14.1 [SD, 5.2]; P < 0.001). No participants from either group had mesothelioma, lung cancer, liver cancer, fibrosis, or cirrhosis, parathyroid problems, pituitary gland tumours, adrenal insufficiency or adrenal hormone excess, Addison disease, Conn or Cushing syndromes, phaeochromocytoma, or Parkinson disease.

The group mean values for nine of 66 clinical variables also differed significantly between the two groups; the differences were adverse for the PTSD participants, with the exception of basophil numbers. There were no significant differences in CAC scores (Box 3, B; online Appendix 2, B). No participants from either group were hepatitis B- or C- positive or had anti-mitochondrial antibodies.

After adjusting for multiple testing, five of the 24 adverse outcomes were significant predictors of PTSD after applying a 10% false discovery rate (FDR): a self-reported history of gastroesophageal reflux or peptic ulcers, and three sleep-related disorders (history of diagnosed OSA; high risk category for OSA on the Berlin Questionnaire; restless legs syndrome) (Box 3, A).

Regression analyses

After direct comparison of groups, regression models were developed for 23 of the 24 nominally significant adverse outcomes (unadjusted P < 0.05). History of seizures or epilepsy was excluded from the analysis, as no control participants reported this outcome.

Box 4 shows the ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between PTSD and each outcome, adjusted for significant confounding demographic and risk factors (Model 1). PTSD remained significantly associated with 17 outcomes: history of MI, wheeze, gastrointestinal problems (reflux, peptic ulcers, irritable bowel syndrome [IBS], constipation), abnormal liver texture, sleep disorders (diagnosed OSA, high risk of OSA on Berlin Questionnaire, restless legs syndrome, ESS), headaches, hearing loss, forced expiratory volume ratio [FEV1%] predicted), anion gap, α1-antitrypsin levels, and caeruloplasmin levels. Seven outcomes were accounted for by the demographic and risk factors of age, BMI, smoking, and alcohol use: shortness of breath on exertion, history of fatty liver, urticaria, reduced forced vital capacity ratio (FVC%) predicted, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), triglyceride levels, and high density lipoprotein levels.

After also exploring depression and anxiety symptoms in addition to demographic confounders (Model 2), seven associations with PTSD identified in Model 1 were accounted for by symptoms of depression (history of MI, wheeze, reflux, OSA and high risk of OSA, restless legs, and ESS), and four by anxiety symptoms (abnormal liver texture, headaches, α1-antitrypsin levels, caeruloplasmin levels). Peptic ulcers, IBS, constipation, hearing loss, FEV1% predicted, and anion gap were significantly and positively associated with a PTSD diagnosis, independently of symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Discussion

We found a greater prevalence of comorbidities in Australian Vietnam War veterans with PTSD than among trauma-exposed control persons without PTSD. In particular, veterans with PTSD had higher rates of comorbidities of the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, as well as a higher prevalence of sleep disorders. The proportions of participants with PTSD with risk factors for physical disease (higher BMI, smoking, and alcohol dependence) were greater. This is consistent with reports of associations between PTSD and obesity, lack of exercise,14 and health risk behaviours, such as smoking and alcohol dependence.12 These factors accounted for several differences between the groups, including shortness of breath on exertion, fatty liver, urticaria, eGFR, and triglyceride levels, highlighting the importance of treating these health risk behaviours as part of PTSD therapy.

The association between peptic ulcers and IBS with depression and anxiety, as well as with PTSD, was first proposed in the early 1990s.15 Case–control studies that examined the prevalence of anxiety and depression in people with functional gastrointestinal disorders have confirmed an association,16 and treating depression has been shown to improve IBS symptoms.17 The results of case–control studies investigating links between IBS and PTSD or trauma have been less clear;18-20 they have not confirmed an association between IBS and PTSD independent of trauma exposure. We found that PTSD was significantly associated with a previous diagnosis of IBS or peptic ulcer, and with a history of constipation, and that these associations were independent of depression or anxiety.

These findings highlight a major strength of our study: the rigorous diagnosis of PTSD with multiple measures for assessing trauma history, allowing us to delineate a trauma-exposed control group. Use of questionnaires with checklists for self-reported data, standardised tools, and objective clinical measures administered by clinicians helped overcome problems of recall bias, including the possibility that people with PTSD may over-report symptoms.21

The relationship between PTSD and CVD is well documented, and recent studies have found this association remains after adjusting for comorbid depression.6,10,22 We found an increased risk of MI in those with PTSD, an association explained by symptoms of depression. This is consistent with a large study22 that found the 8-year cumulative incidence of MI in people with PTSD to be 8.0%, compared with 5.9% for those who did not have PTSD; this result was also accounted for by depression.22 In contrast to other studies,23 we found no significant difference in CAC scores, suggesting that the higher prevalence of MI among PTSD patients is not explained by increased atherosclerotic plaque burden, but rather by increased susceptibility to plaque rupture and subsequent intraluminal thrombus formation, two processes associated with systemic inflammation,24 also more common in people with PTSD.

The lower predicted FEV1% in our participants with PTSD is consistent with the findings of a German report,8 but we are the first to report this finding for a veteran population in a study with a trauma-exposed control group. As in the German report, we did not observe a consistent pattern across all respiratory measures; however, chronic airway inflammation causing airflow obstruction would explain our findings.

Comorbid depression is very common in PTSD (with a prevalence as high as 50%25). We found that 22% of our participants with PTSD had depressive symptoms of moderate or greater degree according to the DASS-21. These symptoms increase the complexity and difficulty of treating PTSD, augmenting the risk that PTSD will be persistent and chronic. We also explored whether anxiety symptoms accounted for the association of PTSD with comorbid physical illness, but such symptoms should not be conceptualised as confounders, but rather as components of the symptomatology of PTSD. Symptoms shared by PTSD and anxiety disorders are treated in the same manner, including with psychological and pharmacological therapies.

Limitations to our study include its cross-sectional design, which prohibited assessing the temporal relationship between PTSD, confounders, and comorbidities. It also did not allow consideration of the time course or chronicity of PTSD symptoms. Further, the number of participants was relatively small; a larger number may have afforded the power to detect additional significant associations. Finally, it has been shown that PTSD is a risk factor for all-cause mortality among veterans of the Vietnam and other wars, independent of conventional physical comorbidities.6,23 As we studied our participants four decades after the war, they probably constituted a healthier survivor cohort than would have been observed closer to the conflict. Further, veterans needed to be well enough to participate, so that those with very severe, acute PTSD were not recruited for the study. The lack of comorbidity data from these more seriously affected veterans may have led to underestimating the extent of associations, or indeed to missing associations that contribute to early mortality in this group.

Nevertheless, our study adds further evidence about the association between PTSD and general disease. The significant contribution to physical pathology by conditions associated with PTSD (depression, obesity, alcohol and nicotine use) should alert the clinician to the importance of treating these conditions in combat veterans. Additionally, effective treatment of anxiety may significantly reduce the risk of increased physical morbidity in combat veterans. Large scale, long term prospective studies of young veterans could help elucidate the time course of disease development.

Conclusion

The higher frequency of comorbid physical conditions suggests that PTSD be conceptualised not as a purely mental disorder, but rather as a systemic disorder. Integrated health care strategies directed at the psychological and physical health of patients with PTSD, as well as rigorous control of risk factors, are likely to improve their quality of life and their survival.

Box 1 – Study design of the Gallipoli Medical Research Institute Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Study

Box 2 – Characteristics of the Gallipoli Medical Research Institute Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Study participants, by PTSD diagnosis*

Characteristic

No PTSD

PTSD

P


Number of participants

106

108

 

Age (years), mean (SD); range

69.2 (4.2); 63–86

68.5 (4.1); 60–88

0.19

Weight (kg), mean (SD); range

90.6 (14.1); 62–126

93.7 (16.2); 63–146

0.16

Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD); range

29.0 (4.3); 20.6–43.0

30.3 (4.9); 21.2–45.8

0.037

Body mass index category

 

 

0.22

< 25 kg/m2

17 (16%)

12 (11%)

 

25–30 kg/m2

50 (47%)

44 (41%)

 

> 30 kg/m2

39 (37%)

52 (48%)

 

Smoking status

 

 

Current smoker

7 (7%)

14 (13%)

0.17

Recent smoker (within 12 months)

8 (8%)

21 (19%)

0.016

Past smoker (> 12 months ago)

80 (76%)

89 (82%)

0.24

Smoking pack-year history, mean (SD); range

18.7 (22.5); 0–105

26.2 (29.2); 0–150

0.041

Currently consumes alcohol

102 (96%)

92 (85%)

0.008

AUDIT score, mean (SD); range

6.2 (4.3); 0–23

8.5 (6.8); 0–30

0.14

AUDIT score category

 

 

0.010

Low risk (0–7)

74 (70%)

55 (51%)

 

Risky or hazardous level (8–15)

28 (26%)

38 (35%)

 

High risk or harmful level (16–19)

3 (3%)

8 (7%)

 

High risk; probably dependent (≥ 20)

1 (1%)

7 (6%)

 

Ethnic background

 

1.0

European

103 (97%)

102 (94%)

 

Indigenous Australian

0

1 (1%)

 

Other

0

1 (1%)

 

Not reported

3 (3%)

4 (4%)

 

Marital status

 

0.99

Single

1 (1%)

1 (1%)

 

Married

93 (88%)

95 (88%)

 

Divorced

9 (8%)

9 (8%)

 

Widowed

2 (2%)

1 (1%)

 

Other

1 (1%)

2 (2%)

 

Employment status

 

< 0.001

Full-time

16 (15%)

2 (2%)

 

Part-time

10 (9%)

7 (6%)

 

Retired

75 (71%)

76 (70%)

 

Not working

4 (4%)

22 (20%)

 

Other

1 (1%)

1 (1%)

 

Highest education level

 

0.006

University

44 (42%)

23 (21%)

 

Year 11 or 12

26 (24%)

24 (22%)

 

Year 10

14 (13%)

21 (20%)

 

Less than year 10

6 (6%)

16 (15%)

 

Vocational

16 (15%)

24 (22%)

 


AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. * Expressed as number of participants (percentage of group) unless otherwise stated. † Comparison of log-transformed distributions.

Box 3 – Clinical measures for participants for which a statistically significant difference between the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and control groups was detected*

A. Binary variables: expressed as number of participants (percentage of group)

Outcome

No PTSD

PTSD

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P

False discovery rate


Number of participants

106

108

 

 

 

Self-reported history

 

 

 

 

 

Cardiovascular

 

 

 

 

 

Myocardial infarction

4 (4%)

16 (15%)

4.43 (1.43–13.7)

0.006

0.12

Cardiorespiratory

 

 

 

 

 

Symptomatic wheeze

15 (14%)

27 (25%)

2.02 (1.01–4.07)

0.046

0.28

Shortness of breath when exercising

18 (17%)

34 (32%)

2.25 (1.17–4.30)

0.014

0.17

Cancer

 

 

 

 

 

Basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma

59 (56%)

45 (42%)

0.57 (0.33–0.98)

0.041

0.27

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

Fatty liver

4 (4%)

15 (14%)

4.11 (1.32–12.8)

0.01

0.16

Gastrointestinal

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnosed gastroesophageal reflux

49 (46%)

74 (68%)

2.53 (1.45–4.42)

0.001

0.048

History of peptic ulcers

12 (11%)

31 (29%)

3.15 (1.52–6.55)

0.002

0.048

Irritable bowel syndrome

12 (11%)

26 (24%)

2.48 (1.18–5.23)

0.015

0.17

Constipation

1 (1%)

8 (7%)

8.40 (1.03–68.4)

0.019

0.17

Neurological

 

 

 

 

 

History of any seizures (including epilepsy)

0

4 (4 %)

NA

0.046

0.28

Headaches (any type)

21 (20%)

35 (32%)

1.94 (1.04–3.63)

0.037

0.27

Sleep

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea

22 (21%)

46 (43%)

2.83 (1.55–5.19)

< 0.001

0.048

Obstructive sleep apnoea, high risk Berlin category

44 (42%)

72 (67%)

2.82 (1.62–4.91)

< 0.001

0.035

Restless legs

27 (26%)

50 (46%)

2.52 (1.42–4.50)

0.002

0.048

Skin

 

 

 

 

 

Urticaria

10 (9%)

21 (19%)

2.32 (1.03–5.19)

0.038

0.27

Ears/hearing

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing loss

64 (60%)

82 (76%)

2.07 (1.15–3.73)

0.015

0.17

Measured parameters

 

 

 

 

 

Abdominal ultrasound

 

 

 

 

 

Abnormal liver texture

17 (16%)

34 (32%)

2.38 (1.23–4.60)

0.009

0.16


 

B. Continuous variables: expressed as mean (SD)

Outcome

No PTSD

PTSD

Difference of means (95% CI)

P

False discovery rate


Number of participants

106

108

 

 

 

Respiratory system

 

 

 

 

 

FEV1% predicted

87.1% (16.8)

81.8% (16.8)

–5.35 (–9.89 to –0.80)

0.021

0.18

FVC% predicted

94.5% (14.3)

89.6% (15.8)

–4.93 (–8.99 to –0.87)

0.018

0.17

Pathology

 

 

 

 

 

Anion gap (mmol/L)

7.96 (1.78)

8.64 (2.33)

0.68 (0.118–1.24)

0.018

0.17

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2)

78.3 (13.7)

75 (14.5)

–3.27 (–7.08 to 0.533)

0.027§

0.21

Triglycerides (mmol/L)

1.38 (0.575)

1.66 (1.16)

0.281 (0.035–0.528)

0.026

0.21

Basophils (106/L)

39.7 (25.2)

33.5 (19.8)

–6.09 (0.99–1.00)

0.047

0.28

α1-Antitrypsin (g/L)

1.24 (0.20)

1.31 (0.22)

0.07 (0.01–0.13)

0.016

0.17

Caeruloplasmin (g/L)

0.233 (0.032)

0.248 (0.041)

0.015 (0.005–0.025)

0.003

0.072

Sleep

 

 

 

 

 

Epworth sleepiness score

7.6 (4.0)

9.2 (5.7)

1.6 (0.3–2.9)

0.018

0.17


FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC = forced vital capacity; NA = not applicable. * The complete data for all clinical measures are included in online Appendix 2. † Accounts for confounding medications (see online Appendix 1, table 2). ‡ Comparison of log-transformed distributions, with 95% CI = ratio of log-transformed means. § Non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney). False discovery rate was calculated with consideration of all tests performed.

Box 4 – Evaluation of a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis as a risk factor for adverse outcomes. Model 1: includes significant confounding demographic factors. Model 2: evaluation of symptoms of depression and anxiety as explanatory risk factors for association of PTSD with outcomes, including significant confounding demographic factors*

A. Logistic model

Outcome

Model 1


Model 2


PTSD and demographic factors

PTSD odds ratio (95% CI)

Psychological and demographic factors

PTSD odds ratio (95% CI)


Heart attack/myocardial infarction

PTSD + smoking

3.74 (1.18–11.9)

Depression + smoking

Shortness of breath when exercising

Age + BMI + alcohol

Anxiety + age + BMI + alcohol

Wheeze

PTSD

2.02 (1.01–4.07)

Depression

Fatty liver

BMI + alcohol

BMI + alcohol

Reflux

PTSD + alcohol

2.25 (1.28–3.98)

Depression + alcohol

Peptic ulcers

PTSD

3.15 (1.52–6.55)

PTSD

3.15 (1.52–6.55)

Irritable bowel syndrome

PTSD

2.48 (1.18–5.23)

PTSD

2.48 (1.18–5.23)

Constipation

PTSD

8.4 (1.03–68.4)

PTSD

8.4 (1.03–68.4)

Abnormal liver texture

PTSD + BMI

2.09 (1.06–4.15)

Anxiety + BMI

Diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea

PTSD + age + BMI

2.84 (1.47–5.48)

Depression + age + BMI

Obstructive sleep apnoea, high risk Berlin category

PTSD + BMI + alcohol

2.25 (1.22–4.16)

Depression + BMI + alcohol

Restless legs

PTSD

2.52 (1.42–4.50)

Depression

Headaches

PTSD

1.94 (1.04–3.63)

Anxiety

Urticaria

Alcohol

Alcohol

Hearing loss

PTSD

2.07 (1.15–3.73)

PTSD

2.07 (1.15–3.73)


 

B. Linear model

Outcome

Model 1


Model 2


PTSD and demographics model

PTSD coefficient (95% CI)

PTSD and demographics model

PTSD coefficient (95% CI)


FEV1% predicted

PTSD + age + smoking

–4.51 (–8.81 to –0.22)

PTSD + age + smoking

–4.51 (–8.81 to –0.22)

FVC% predicted

BMI + smoking

BMI + smoking

Anion gap (mmol/L)

PTSD + BMI

0.593 (0.034–1.15)

PTSD + BMI

0.593 (0.034–1.15)

eGFR

Age + BMI

Depression + age + BMI

Triglycerides (mmol/L)

BMI + smoking + alcohol

BMI + smoking + alcohol

α1-Antitrypsin (g/L)

PTSD

0.071 (0.014–0.128)

Anxiety

Caeruloplasmin (g/L)

PTSD

0.015 (0.005–0.025)

Anxiety

Epworth sleepiness score

PTSD + BMI + smoking

1.62 (0.30–2.94)

Depression


BMI = body mass index; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC = forced vital capacity. ∗ See online Appendix 1, tables 3 and 4, for complete record of analyses. † Model accounts for lipid-lowering agents as well as other confounders.

Received 3 August 2016, accepted 22 November 2016

  • Sarah C McLeay1,2
  • Wendy M Harvey1
  • Madeline NM Romaniuk1,3
  • Darrell HG Crawford1,2
  • David M Colquhoun1,2
  • Ross McD Young1,3
  • Miriam Dwyer1
  • John M Gibson1,4
  • Robyn A O'Sullivan1,4
  • Graham Cooksley1,2
  • Christopher R Strakosch1,2
  • Rachel M Thomson1,2
  • Joanne Voisey1,3
  • Bruce R Lawford1,3

  • 1 Gallipoli Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
  • 2 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
  • 3 Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD
  • 4 Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD


Correspondence: mcleays@ramsayhealth.com.au

Acknowledgements: 

The Queensland Branch of the Returned and Services League of Australia (RSL) funded the PTSD Initiative at the Gallipoli Medical Research Institute. Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology and Queensland X-Ray provided in-kind support, and the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs provided transport for eligible participants. We thank Emile Touma and Vikram Goel for performing psychiatric assessments, and Terence Harvey for developing the study database. We also gratefully acknowledge the dedicated efforts of the participants and their families, and the clinical and support staff involved in data collection.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. O’Toole BI, Marshall RP, Grayson DA, et al. The Australian Vietnam Veterans Health Study: III. Psychological health of Australian Vietnam veterans and its relationship to combat. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25: 331-340.
  • 2. Marmar CR, Schlenger W, Henn-Haase C, et al. Course of posttraumatic stress disorder 40 years after the Vietnam War: findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72: 875-881.
  • 3. Dobson AT, Zheng W, Anderson R, et al. The Middle East Area of Operations (MEAO) Health Study: census study summary report. Dec 2012. Brisbane: University of Queensland, Centre for Military and Veteran Health, 2012. http://www.defence.gov.au/Health/Home/Docs/MEAOCensusStudyReportVolI.pdf (accessed Nov 2016).
  • 4. Forbes D, O’Donnell M, Brand RM, et al. The long-term mental health impact of peacekeeping: prevalence and predictors of psychiatric disorder. B J Psych Open 2016; 2: 32-37.
  • 5. Boscarino JA. Diseases among men 20 years after exposure to severe stress: implications for clinical research and medical care. Psychosom Med 1997; 59: 605-614.
  • 6. Boscarino JA. A prospective study of PTSD and early-age heart disease mortality among Vietnam veterans: implications for surveillance and prevention. Psychosom Med 2008; 70: 668-676.
  • 7. O’Toole BI, Catts SV. Trauma, PTSD, and physical health: an epidemiological study of Australian Vietnam veterans. J Psychosom Res 2008; 64: 33-40.
  • 8. Spitzer C, Koch B, Grabe HJ, et al. Association of airflow limitation with trauma exposure and post-traumatic stress disorder. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1068-1075.
  • 9. Boscarino JA. Posttraumatic stress disorder and physical illness: results from clinical and epidemiologic studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1032: 141-153.
  • 10. Edmondson D, Kronish IM, Shaffer JA, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk for coronary heart disease: a meta-analytic review. Am Heart J 2013; 166: 806-814.
  • 11. Jaoude P, Vermont LN, Porhomayon J, El-Solh AA. Sleep-disordered breathing in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 259-268.
  • 12. Zen AL, Whooley MA, Zhao S, Cohen BE. Post-traumatic stress disorder is associated with poor health behaviors: findings from the heart and soul study. Health Psychol 2012; 31: 194-201.
  • 13. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 1995; 57: 289-300.
  • 14. Bartoli F, Crocamo C, Alamia A, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk of obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: e1253-e1261.
  • 15. Irwin C, Falsetti SA, Lydiard RB, et al. Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder and irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; 57: 576-578.
  • 16. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Ford AC, Avila CA, et al. Anxiety and depression increase in a stepwise manner in parallel with multiple FGIDs and symptom severity and frequency. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1038-1048.
  • 17. Ford AC, Quigley EMM, Lacy BE, et al. Effect of antidepressants and psychological therapies, including hypnotherapy, in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1350-1365.
  • 18. Iorio N, Makipour K, Palit A, Friedenberg FK. Post-traumatic stress disorder is associated with irritable bowel syndrome in African Americans. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 20: 523-530.
  • 19. White DL, Savas LS, Daci K, et al. Trauma history and risk of the irritable bowel syndrome in women veterans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 551-561.
  • 20. Cohen H, Jotkowitz A, Buskila D, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and other co-morbidities in a sample population of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Eur J Intern Med 2006; 17: 567-571.
  • 21. Frueh BC, Hamner MB, Cahill SP, et al. Apparent symptom overreporting in combat veterans evaluated for PTSD. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20: 853-885.
  • 22. Beristianos MH, Yaffe K, Cohen B, Byers AL. PTSD and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in aging veterans. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2016; 24: 192-200.
  • 23. Ahmadi N, Hajsadeghi F, Mirshkarlo HB, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder, coronary atherosclerosis, and mortality. Am J Cardiol 2011; 108: 29-33.
  • 24. Sager HB, Nahrendorf M. Inflammation: a trigger for acute coronary syndrome. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 60: 185-193.
  • 25. Flory J, Yehuda R. Comorbidity between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder: alternative explanations and treatment considerations. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2015; 17: 141-150.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.