Connect
MJA
MJA

Light-based epilation device-related injury to the cornea

Lawrence Oh and Stephanie Watson
Med J Aust 2017; 206 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00478
Published online: 6 March 2017

Clinical record


  • 1 Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Save Sight Institute, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: lawrence.oh90@gmail.com

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Thaysen-Petersen D, Bjerring P, Dierickx C, et al. A systematic review of light-based home-use devices for hair removal and considerations on human safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereal 2012; 26: 543-553.
  • 2. Raulin C, Greve B, Grema H. IPL technology: a review. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 32: 78-87.
  • 3. Hong S, Lee JR, Lim T. Pigment deposition of cosmetic contact lenses on the cornea after intense pulsed-light treatment. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010; 6: 367-370.
  • 4. Brilakis HS, Holland EJ. Diode-laser-induced cataract and iris atrophy as a complication of eyelid hair removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 137: 762-763.
  • 5. Craig JP, Chen Y, Turnbull PRK. Prospective trial of intense pulsed light for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 1965-1970.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.