Connect
MJA
MJA

Sampling: how you choose people is as important as how you analyse their data

Michael P Jones and John R Attia
Med J Aust 2017; 206 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00521
Published online: 6 February 2017

Much attention is paid in research publications to the methods of statistical analysis. Research design, in contrast, receives less consideration, despite the fact that it is critical; if the research design is poor, no amount of complex statistical analysis can extract useful information from the data collected. In this article, we focus on the selection of subjects for medical research studies, and outline several sampling strategies and their implications for statistical analysis. As a high level overview of sampling in medical research, we do not go into deep technical detail. Further, we discuss how to obtain a sample, but not how large the sample should be; we refer readers to Lachin1 for an introduction to the important topic of sample size and statistical power calculations.


  • 1 Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 3 John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW


Correspondence: mike.jones@mq.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Lachin JM. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1981; 2: 93-113.
  • 2. Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.
  • 3. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of health surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
  • 4. Kish L, Frankel MR. Inference from complex samples. J R Stat Soc Series B 1974; 36: 1-37.
  • 5. Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Chinn S. Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 876-883.
  • 6. Osborne JW. Best practices in using large, complex samples: the importance of using appropriate weights and design effect compensation. Prac Assess Res Eval 2011; 16: 1-7.
  • 7. Hedt BL, Pagano M. Health indicators: eliminating bias from convenience sampling estimators. Stat Med 2011; 30: 560-568.
  • 8. Ranmuthugala G, Karr M, Mira M, et al. Opportunistic sampling from early childhood centres: a substitute for random sampling to determine lead and iron status of pre-school children? Aust N Z J Public Health 1998; 22: 512-514.
  • 9. Whittemore AS, Halpern J. Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology. Stat Med 1997; 16: 153-167.
  • 10. Hu W, Cai J, Zeng D. Sample size/power calculation for stratified case-cohort design. Stat Med 2014; 33: 3973-3985.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.