MJA
MJA

Trends in methamphetamine residues in wastewater in metropolitan and regional cities in south-east Queensland, 2009–2015

Foon Yin Lai, Jake O'Brien, Phong K Thai, Wayne D Hall and Jochen Mueller
Med J Aust 2016; 204 (4): 151-152. || doi: 10.5694/mja15.01054
Published online: 7 March 2016

Over the past several years, the Australian media have reported increased use and harm arising from the use of crystal methamphetamine (“ice”),1,2 a highly pure form of the drug that can be smoked or injected.2 We used wastewater analysis to examine trends in methamphetamine residues in wastewater samples from the inlets of two treatment plants in south-east Queensland. One plant served a coastal metropolitan city that included entertainment precincts and the other a major inland regional city.

Wastewater analysis is an approach to monitoring illicit drug use in the population,3 in which liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry are used to measure the concentrations of illicit drug residues in wastewater. We used drug-specific excretion factors and the de jure population from the Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011 census data for these catchments to estimate the amount of methamphetamine consumed by people who contributed to the wastewater samples.

We collected a total of 498 samples in the metropolitan city (2009–2015) and 712 samples in the regional city (2010–2015). Details of the sampling, analytical and back-calculation methods are described in the Appendix.

Methamphetamine consumption (measured in milligrams per day per 1000 inhabitants) was higher in the metropolitan city than in the regional city, and levels in both locations increased significantly between 2009–2010 and 2015 (P < 0.001) (Box 1). Consumption increased 4.8 times in the metropolitan area between 2009 and 2015, and 3.4 times in the regional city between 2010 and 2015 (Box 2).

Our results are similar to trends found in methamphetamine in wastewater in South Australia between 2010 and 2013.4 They are also consistent with increases in the purity of methamphetamine seized by police, arrests for methamphetamine use and supply, and the number of people seeking treatment for methamphetamine-related problems.3,5

Some caveats apply to our findings. First, the populations contributing to the samples in each area could not be determined exactly. Second, our data do not allow us to decide whether methamphetamine consumption has increased because there are more new users, because current users are consuming higher doses of a purer drug, or as a result of a combination of these possibilities.

We detected an almost fivefold increase in methamphetamine residues in wastewater in an urban city and a more than threefold increase in a regional city in south-east Queensland. These results demonstrate the potential value of wastewater analysis in providing timely data on trends in illicit drug consumption in the population of urban and regional cities.

Box 1 – Estimated methamphetamine consumption (mg/day/1000 people) detected in wastewater in coastal urban and inland regional cities in south-east Queensland

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015


Urban city

Range

173–353

246–526

142–978

254–1279

330–1511

566–1416

952–1401

Median

222

343

452

514

615

825

1062

Mean

234

363

467

553

599

839

1126

Coefficient of variation

23%

22%

31%

32%

31%

21%

14%

Regional city*

Range

73–188

69–229

64–448

61–492

188–485

318–518

Median

112

126

150

210

315

381

Mean

115

127

158

228

323

398

Coefficient of variation

20%

24%

33%

41%

23%

14%


* No samples taken in 2009.

Box 2 – Estimated methamphetamine consumption (mg/day/1000 people) detected in wastewater in coastal urban and inland regional cities in south-east Queensland, plotted in box-and-whisker and fitted trend with 95% confidence intervals

Received 17 September 2015, accepted 13 January 2016

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.