In our editorial we cited a paper as evidence of clinicians misinterpreting guidelines that asymptomatic women should not have gonorrhoea testing.1 The authors of that paper have brought to our attention that their report used an older guideline published in 2008 by the Sexual Health Society of Victoria which does, in fact, recommend both chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing of young asymptomatic women.2 The guidelines referred to in our editorial and the linked article were published in 2012 by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and recommend that gonorrhoea screening be limited only to those at highest risk for gonorrhoea.3 We apologise for implying that Hoad et al misinterpreted guidelines when their paper was in fact in accordance with the older guidelines. The fact that those guidelines appear to have not been updated and are likely to be still in widespread use today may itself be a reason for why low-risk young Australian women continue to be screened for gonorrhoea.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Hoad, V. and A. Thambiran, Evaluating the chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening program in the Humanitarian Entrant Health Service, Western Australia. MJA, 2012. 197: 47-49.
- 2. Sexual Health Society of Victoria. National Management Guidelines for Sexually Transmissible Infections. 2008. https://www.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=588CCF7A-07BF-0153-DB433D495BD214EE
- 3. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 8th ed. 2012 [cited 2015; http://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Guidelines/Redbook8/redbook8.pdf].
No relevant disclosures.