To the Editor: The reduction in anatomy teaching by whole-body dissection in medical education is a critical matter that has received substantial attention in the medical education literature.1,2 Where anatomy teaching by whole-body dissection has remained, there has been a marked move away from the tradition of such courses being taught by surgeons. A recent review of anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand showed that teaching of gross anatomy is now predominantly undertaken by non-clinical staff, including medical students, science graduates, physiotherapists and technical staff.2 Speculation has arisen that the teaching of anatomy by non-clinical staff may lead to a lack of depth in understanding of topographical clinical anatomy among medical graduates.2
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Fahrer M. Art macabre: is anatomy necessary [editorial]? ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 333-334.
- 2. Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 212-216.
- 3. Ellis H. The surgeon as a teacher of anatomy. Aust N Z J Surg 1993; 63: 513-514.
- 4. Ramsey-Stewart G, Burgess AW, Hill DA. Back to the future: teaching anatomy by whole-body dissection. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 668-671. <MJA full text>
- 5. Peck D, Skandalakis JE. The anatomy of teaching and the teaching of anatomy. Am Surg 2004; 70: 366-368.
No relevant disclosures.