Connect
MJA
MJA

Caveat emptor: the corruption of open access scientific publishing

Lileane Liang Xu and Anthony Minh Tien Chau
Med J Aust 2014; 200 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.00082
Published online: 21 April 2014

To the Editor: Since our publication in the Journal,1 it would seem that a simple case report lead-authored by an intern has rendered him a virtual expert in the fields of infectious diseases, cell biology and cardiology, just to name a few. Or at least, one could be led to believe so with the sheer number of enticing invitations received in our corresponding author's inbox (about five per week), inviting his “eminent self” to write journal articles, sit on editorial boards, and speak at international cardiology conferences in far-reaching and exotic locations such as Guangzhou and Dubai.2


  • 1 Orthopaedics, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 Neurosurgery, Macquarie Neurosurgery, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: amtchau@gmail.com

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Chau AM, Xu LL, Fairhall JM, et al. Brain abscess due to Propionibacterium propionicum in Eisenmenger syndrome. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 525-526. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Gransalke K. Fake conferences. Lab Times 2009; (6): 6-7.
  • 3. Butler D. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature 2013; 495: 433-435.
  • 4. Bohannon J. Who's afraid of peer review? Science 2013; 342: 60-65.
  • 5. Schekman R. How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. The Guardian 2013; 10 Dec. (accessed Feb 2014).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.