To the Editor: Dendle and colleagues1 challenge the well established and empirically based practice of the “idle IV” — an unused peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted in the emergency department (ED) in case it is needed subsequently, but which frequently remains unused. However, the risks associated with unused PIVCs are not the whole story.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Dendle C, Stuart RL, Egerton-Warburton D. Think before you insert an intravenous catheter. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 655. <MJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
No relevant disclosures.